Appendix E – Statement of Reasons - Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
(IMU)
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
(Also known as: IMU, Islamic
party of Turkestan, Islamic Movement of Turkestan)
The
following background information is based on publicly available details about
the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU). These details have been corroborated
by official reporting. ASIO assess the details set out below are accurate and
reliable.
The IMU
has been listed in the United Nations 1267 Committee’s consolidated list and as
a proscribed terrorist organisation by the governments of the UK, US, and
Canada.
Current
Status of the IMU
The
origins of the IMU date from the early 1990s, when Juma Namamgani, a former
Soviet soldier who fought in Afghanistan, and Tahir Yuldosh (variant of name,
spelled Yuldashev in most reporting), an unofficial mullah and head of the
Adolat (Justice) Party, joined forces to implement sharia law in the city of
Namangan in Uzbekistan’s part of the Ferghana Valley. Alarmed by Adolat’s demands
to transform Uzbekistan into an Islamic state, the government banned Adolat in
March 1992. A period of repression followed, forcing many Islamic militants to
flee the Ferghana Valley.
Namangani
fled to Tajikistan, where he participated in the Tajik Civil War and
established a base for his fighters in that country. Yuldashev escaped to
Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, where he established links to other
Islamic militants. He also made clandestine trips to Uzbekistan, maintaining
contact with his supporters and setting up underground cells. By the late
1990s, the IMU was officially formed. Its stated goal, as posted on the
internet in August 1999, was the “establishment of an Islamic state with the
application of the Shariah” in Uzbekistan.
The
IMU’s reach into Central Asia peaked from 1999 to 2001, when it conducted a
series of attacks in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and made incursions into
Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, from bases in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.
The
IMU’s goal of an Islamic state was expanded in 2001 to encompass an area
stretching from the Caucasus to China’s western province of Xinjiang, under the
new banners of the Islamic Party of Turkestan in April 2001 and the Islamic
Movement of Turkestan in May 2001. However, the group has always been and
continues to be known as the IMU, and that is the name under which it is listed
by the US Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism as a foreign terrorist
organisation.
By the
end of the 1990s, the IMU had relocated to Afghanistan, due to the lack of
support for the movement in Uzbekistan and the measures taken against it by the
government. The IMU suffered heavy losses in the fighting that followed the US
invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, including the death of Namangani.
The
remnants of the IMU fled to the tribal areas of neighbouring Pakistan, where
their behaviour in some areas brought them into conflict with the local
tribesmen and the Pakistani military. However, many IMU fighters have
successfully integrated into the local community, where they have enjoyed the
hospitality and sanctuary provided by the tribes.
The IMU
continues to recruit fighters, and IMU members fight alongside the Taliban and
al-Qa’ida against coalition and Pakistani forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The Ferghana Valley, where the Uzbek, Kyrgyz, and Tajik borders converge, is a
fertile recruiting ground for the IMU, which has successfully exploited the
widespread poverty in the region in its recruitment strategy.
IMU
members have received training in camps in Afghanistan, some controlled by
al-Qa’ida or the Taliban. The IMU also trains in camps in Pakistan and
maintains bases there. Typical IMU tactics have included hostage-taking, raids
on government security force outposts, and bombings.
The IMU
has close ties with al-Qa'ida and the Taliban. Senior IMU leaders have held
positions in the al-Qa’ida hierarchy. Sources of funding for the IMU have
included criminal activities such as drug trafficking, as well as donations
from sympathisers and al-Qa’ida.
On 11
September 2006, the IMU leadership renewed its commitment to attack the
governments of Central Asia and issued personal threats against the Uzbek,
Kyrgyz, and Tajik Presidents. This statement reinforced the IMU leadership’s
commitment to al-Qa’ida’s ideology of global jihad and continued anti-Western
and anti-Israeli rhetoric.
The
IMU’s losses in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as well as the defection of fighters
to a splinter group, the Islamic Jihad Union, have not diminished the group’s
capability and intent to conduct terrorist attacks.
Objectives
The
IMU’s initial objective was to overthrow the Uzbek regime and replace it with
an Islamic state. Uzbekistan is part of what its Russian conquerors called
Turkestan, a collective name for the old Central Asian feudal states. The IMU’s
stated goal now is to establish an Islamic caliphate in Turkestan, stretching
from the Caspian Sea to China’s Xinjiang Province and encompassing the current
Central Asian nations.
Leadership
and membership
Tahir
Yuldashev is the leader of the IMU. His co-founder, Juma Namamgani, was killed
in Afghanistan following the US invasion.
The IMU
has attracted support from a variety of ethnic backgrounds, principally Uzbeks,
Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Chechens, and Uighurs from western China. The strength of the
IMU is approximately 500, with members located in South Asia, Central Asia, and
Iran. Among the IMU’s supporters in the Middle East, Central Asia, and South
Asia are a large Uzbek diaspora and several Islamic extremist groups.
Terrorist
activities
Terrorist
attacks and activities inside Central Asia for which the IMU has claimed
responsibility or for which responsibility has been reliably attributed
include:
·
16 February
1999: five car bombings in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, that killed at least 16 people
and wounded over 130, in an apparent attempt to assassinate President Karimov
·
21 August
1999: taking hostage four Japanese geologists, their interpreter, and the head
of the Kyrgyz Ministry of Interior troops
·
12 August
2000: taking hostage four US mountain climbers
·
27 December
2002: a bombing in a market in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, that killed six people and
wounded 40
·
8 May 2003: a
bombing in a currency exchange office in Osh, Kyrgyzstan, that killed one
person
·
31January and
13 June 2005: bombings outside the Ministry of Emergency Situations in
Dushanbe, Tajikistan, that killed one person and wounded at least 12
·
25 January
2006: an armed attack on a pre-trial detention centre in Kairakum, Tajikistan,
that killed the centre’s chief
·
12 May 2006:
armed attacks on border and customs posts in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
The IMU is now fighting in
support of the Taliban and other Islamic groups against the Afghan government
and international military forces in Afghanistan.
·
In mid-2007,
seven heavily armed militants connected to the IMU were arrested while planting
a mine on a road used by International Security Assistance Forces (ISAF)
patrols in northern Afghanistan. The group admitted to carrying out rocket
attacks, suicide missions and recruitment activities.
·
In May 2008,
two IMU members in possession of explosives and hand grenades were arrested in
Afghanistan. The two admitted to planting mines on a road and providing a base
for militant activities.
IMU leader Tahir Yuldashev has
also stated his support for the Pakistani Taliban in its conflict with the
Pakistani security forces, and Pakistan claims to have killed at least 150
Uzbek militants in 2007.
Conclusion
The Criminal Code
provides that for an organisation to be listed as a terrorist organisation, the
Attorney-General must be satisfied that:
|
(a) |
the organisation is directly or indirectly engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occured or will occur); or |
|
(b) |
the organisation advocates the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occured or will occur). |
On the basis of the
above information, ASIO assesses that Ansar al-Islam is directly engaged in
preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of terrorist acts. It
is considered that the acts attributable to Ansar al-Islam are terrorist acts as
they:
|
(i) |
are done with the intention of advancing a political cause, namely, creating an Islamic caliphate in Iraq; |
|
(ii) |
are intended to coerce or influence by intimidation the governments of foreign countries, including Iraq and Coalition countries, and/or intimidate a sections of the public; and |
|
(iii) |
constitute acts which cause serious physical harm to persons, including death, as well as serious damage to property. |
This
assessment is corroborated by information provided by reliable and credible
intelligence sources.