Chapter 4 Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the
Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution
Damage
Introduction
4.1
The Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the
Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage
(the Protocol) establishes a Supplementary Fund to provide additional
compensation to victims of oil spills. At present, compensation is available to
victims of oil spills under a two-tier system of compensation. The Protocol would
provide an additional third tier of compensation in situations where the
maximum amount of compensation available under the previous two tiers proves
insufficient.[1]
Background
4.2
At present, compensation is available to victims of oil spills first under
the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage
(Civil Liability Convention) and second under the International Convention
on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil
Pollution Damage (Fund Convention).
4.3
Under the Civil Liability Convention, the tanker owner is strictly
liable for damage resulting from a spill of persistent oil. Owners are required
to maintain insurance to cover their liability under the Civil Liability
Convention if they are carrying more than 2,000 tons of persistent oil.[2]
Owners are able to limit their liability with the liability limit set in proportion
to the size of the tanker.
4.4
If the compensation limits of the Civil Liability Convention are
reached, the Fund Convention provides addition compensation for victims of oil
spills.[3] Under the Fund
Convention, compensation
… is financed by levies imposed on persons or entities who
receive by sea transport more than 150,000 tonnes of heavy oils in a calendar
year. The costs vary from year to year as they are dependent on the number and
severity of incidents that occur within states that are party to the fund
convention.[4]
4.5
The Committee was informed that currently the maximum liability limit or
compensation able to obtained in the first instance is approximately $175
million. Under the Fund Convention, the maximum compensation obtainable is
approximately $395 million.[5]
4.6
The two-tier compensation system proved insufficient to compensate
victims of oil spills in three recent high profile instances: the Nakhodka off the coast of Japan in 1996, the Erika off the coast of France in 1999 and the Prestige off
the coast of Spain in 2002.[6]
The Protocol
4.7
The Protocol established a Supplementary Fund which will provide
additional compensation for victims of oil spills up to 750 million Special Drawing
Rights (SDR), approximately $1.46 billion, per incident that affects
Contracting States.[7]
4.8
The Supplementary Fund will be financed through levies on public or
private entities in receipt of more than 150,000 tonnes of contributing oil per
year in Contracting States.[8] Thus, the Supplementary
Fund is
…financed in the same way as the [Fund Convention] is
financed—that is, by levies on persons or entities who receive more than
150,000 tonnes of heavy oils in a calendar year—though contributions from
member states will be calculated as if they had received a minimum of one
million tonnes of heavy oils in a calendar year.[9]
4.9
Contracting States are required to communicate to the Supplementary Fund
information of any person or public or private entity in that State who is
liable to contribute, in addition to the quantity of contributing oil received.[10]
4.10
In practice, levies for the Supplementary Fund would only be collected after
an oil spill occurred and after the first two tiers of compensation are
exhausted:
The fund would work out the number of claimants and the
likely amount of payment and a particular amount per tonne of imported oil
would be levied against each of the contributors. For a major incident, that
could be over three or maybe four years.[11]
4.11
It is likely that contributions to the Supplementary Fund would vary in
accordance with the changing levels of imported contributing oil in any given
year.[12] For instance, Australian
contributions to the Fund Convention have ranged from approximately A$2.44
million to A$5.77 million.[13]
4.12
Contracting States must receive a minimum of 1 million tonnes of
contributing oil.[14] Where a Contracting State does not receive the minimum amount of contributing oil, it can collect
the difference from oil importing entities in its State.[15]
4.13
The Supplementary Fund must be given legal personality by Contracting
States under Article 2(2) of the Protocol. Furthermore, Article 7 provides
that:
§
Australian courts must be given jurisdiction to entertain action
against the Supplementary Fund for compensation
§
the Supplementary Fund must be given the right to intervene in
proceedings for compensation initiated under the Civil Liability Convention.[16]
Costs and consultation
4.14
The National Interest Analysis provides that the costs to the Australian
Government of entering into the Protocol are negligible, as the costs are borne
by oil importing entities.[17]
Implementation and entry into force
4.15
The Protocol entered into force generally on 3 March 2005.[18]
4.16
The Australian Maritime Safety Authority in the course of its duties
will ensure that relevant Australian companies submit their contributing oil
returns to the Supplementary Fund.[19]
4.17
It is expected that legislation will be required to give force to the
Protocol. The Protection of the Sea (International Oil Pollution
Compensation Supplementary Fund) Bill is expected to be introduced into Parliament
in late 2006.[20]
Conclusion and recommendation
4.18
The Committee supports the efforts of the international community to ensure
adequate compensation is available to victims of oil spills.
Recommendation 3 |
|
The Committee supports the Protocol of 2003 to the
International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for
Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992, done at London on 16 May 2003,
and recommends that binding treaty action be taken.
|