House of Representatives Committees

Chapter 7 Research and development

Changing nature of the relationship
Malaysia’s new policies and directions
Provision of research funding
Collaboration between research institutions
Committee comment

Changing nature of the relationship

7.1

Australia has a long and evolving history of research and development collaboration with Malaysia. Initially the relationship was founded on developmental projects and provision of traineeships and advice through the Colombo Plan.1

7.2

DEST told the Committee:

… early interactions took place within the context of development projects funded through Australia’s aid program. Australian scientists working in CSIRO and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research were providing technical assistance to their Malaysian counterparts primarily. … That early period of technical aid has drawn to a close; and, for almost a decade, Australian and Malaysian scientists have been working collaboratively in areas such as agricultural research and transboundary infectious disease control.2

7.3

CSIRO noted that, in terms of number of its international interactions, Malaysia’s ranking had varied from between 7th and 12th in 1997 to 2001, dropping to 18th in 2004, but returning to 12th 2005. Malaysia was, however, the second most important partner in ASEAN. CSIRO’s submission added:

… part of Malaysia’s ranking fluctuation can be attributed to the changing nature of CSIRO’s relationship with Malaysia, mirroring to an extent Malaysia’s transition from an Australian aid recipient to a partner country and a contractor or purchaser of research. This has been particularly evident in the Division of Petroleum Resources which saw a marked increase in contract research with Malaysia during 2005.3

7.4

Further, CSIRO told the Committee that the current relationship with Malaysia was ‘one of partnership, working together collaboratively to solve issues of mutual interest rather than engagement tailored towards capacity building.’4

 

Malaysia’s new policies and directions

7.5

Malaysia’s Second National Science and Technology Policy was announced in 2003. The policy aimed to increase research and development (R&D) spending as a proportion of gross domestic product to 1.5 per cent by 2010. Figures provided by DEST showed that, while there was an overall increase in R&D spending of 47 per cent between 2000 and 2002 (equivalent to $857 million in 2002), R&D only amounts to some 0.69 per cent of Malaysia’s GDP.5

7.6

DEST told the Committee that the Malaysian Government had announced funding for biotechnology development through a long-term national biotechnology policy, and the development of centres of excellence for agriculture, molecular and pharmaceutical biotechnology. Consequently, DEST foresaw that future collaboration in science and technology was promising.6

7.7

A substantial amount of research is carried out at the postgraduate PhD research level. The AVCC told the Committee that Malaysian universities wished to increase the proportion of their staff with PhDs from the current 30 per cent to about 60 per cent.7

7.8

As noted in Chapter 6, these developments mean that there will be opportunities for Australia’s universities and research institutions to increase their engagement with Malaysian researchers.

 

Provision of research funding

7.9

Major sources of funding for Australian researchers include:

7.10

The NCGP which funds researcher-initiated projects contains various elements, including:

7.11

The ARC told the Committee that between 2000 and 2007 it had funded 43 collaborative projects involving Malaysian researchers. Most were funded under the Discovery scheme (25 projects) and the Linkage schemes (11 projects) with a total allocation being just over $9.25 million. In 2007, six projects with Malaysian collaboration were to be funded, valued at around $1.3 million.9

7.12

Statistics provided by the NHMRC indicated that between 2001 and 2005 three grants were provided to researchers for projects involving collaboration with Malaysia. The researchers were from the University of Western Australia and the grants totalled $0.91 million.10

7.13

DEST advised the Committee that in 2006 there had been 46 Endeavour Postgraduate Research and Study Awards granted to Malaysians. Of these, 45 were awarded to Malaysians studying in Australia, with the remainder being for Australians to study in Malaysia. The submission noted that July 2005 saw the announcement of six new Endeavour Malaysia Awards for postgraduate studies, and four new Endeavour Malaysia Research Fellowships for student exchanges. Two awards were reserved for Malaysian students from the International Islamic University Malaysia to study in Australia, and two for Australian students to study at that university.11

7.14

DEST added that many Australian universities were also actively involved in providing exchange scholarships at either the PhD or undergraduate level, hence did not rely on government scholarships.12

7.15

Regarding the AusAID developmental scholarships, DEST commented that they would be ‘almost down to a trickle’ given the stage of economic development Malaysia enjoys.13

 

Collaboration between research institutions

7.16

There are varying degrees of formality in the relationship between Australia’s and Malaysia’s premier research institutes.

7.17

For example, the Australian Academy of Science and the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering have a joint MoU with the Academy of Sciences Malaysia.14 On the other hand, the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) may be moving towards a MoU with its counterparts in Malaysia.

7.18

ANSTO and Malaysian research institutions participate in the Regional Cooperative Agreement and the Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia. Collaborative work includes radiologic safety and radioactive waste management. Malaysians also comprise some five per cent of placements in Australia under the International Atomic Energy Agency Scientific Visits and Fellowships program.

7.19

In May 2006, discussions were held between ANSTO and the Malaysian Institute of Nuclear Technology Research over potential areas for cooperation and collaboration.15

7.20

CSIRO has had a long history in joint research involving Malaysia and has a series of formal relationships:

7.21

CSIRO advised the Committee that it, SIRIM Berhad (CSIRO’s sister institute in Malaysia), and seven other international research organisations had established the Global Research Alliance (GRA). The GRA aimed to:

… facilitate international research and development cooperation in an effort to address the problems facing the world especially in areas of water, health, energy, transportation and digital divide. … GRA has developed a water resources strategic plan of action for the ASEAN region that recognises drivers such as climate change, environmental risk, safe drinking water and sanitation, in-country capacities and future sectoral demand and at the same time delivers some real outcomes in terms of building capacity within ASEAN member nations.17

7.22

Other collaborative work with Malaysia being undertaken by CSIRO includes:

7.23

The Committee was also advised by DEST that the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries was leading a new collaborative project with Malaysia on improving screw-worm fly traps and detection systems. The project was funded by the animal industry and administered through Meat and Livestock Australia with collaborators from the Department of Veterinary Services Malaysia and researchers in Indonesia.20

Committee comment

7.24

The Committee considers that Australia has a very productive R&D relationship with Malaysia. The research is directed at solving practical problems which will benefit both countries.

 

Senator Alan Ferguson

Chair

March 2007



Footnotes

1

CSIRO, Submission No. 2, p. 8. Back

2

Ms Sarah Cowen, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 18. Back

3

CSIRO, Submission No. 2, pp. 10–11. Back

4

Dr Kleanthees Yannakou, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 2. Back

5

DEST, Submission No. 14, p. 116. Back

6

Ms Sarah Cowen, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 18. Back

7

Professor Roger Dean, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 10. Back

8

Professor Elim Papadakis, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 3. Back

9

Professor Elim Papadakis, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 4. Back

10

NHMRC, Submission No. 34, p. 272. Back

11

DEST, Submission No. 14, p. 110. Back

12

Ms Fiona Buffinton, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 21. Back

13

Ms Fiona Buffinton, Transcript 4 December 2006, p. 20. Back

14

DEST, Submission No. 14, p. 116. Back

15

DEST, Submission No. 14, p. 117. Back

16

CSIRO, Submission No. 2, p. 10. Back

17

CSIRO, Submission No. 2, p. 10. Back

18 These closely related viruses are thought to be harboured by flying foxes. In 1994–95, the Hendra virus killed 2 people and 16 horses in Queensland. In 1999, the Nipah virus killed more than 100 people in Malaysia.
CSIRO, Media Release 06/36, Vaccine in sight for Hendra and Nipah virus, 27 February 2006. Back
19

CSIRO, Submission No. 2, pp. 10–11. Back

20 DEST, Submission No. 14, p. 118 Back

Print Chapter 7 (PDF 95KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 6  : Appendix A - >

Back to top

We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledge their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and voices of deceased people.