Contents
Chair's foreword
Membership of the Committee
Terms of reference
List of abbreviations
List of recommendations
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Adequacy of divisional office employment structure
Chapter 3 Divisional offices with shared premises
Chapter 4 The future of the National Tally Room
Appendix A – Submissions to the inquiry
Appendix B – List of exhibits
Appendix C – List of hearings and witnesses
Chair's foreword
Effective electoral administration is a vital component of a healthy democracy. With a federal election approaching, it has been a timely exercise for the committee to review certain aspects of the administration of the Australian Electoral Commission.
The terms of reference required the committee to direct much of its focus on the staffing arrangements across the AEC’s divisional office network. Currently, there are 150 AEC divisional offices in 135 locations across Australia.
The committee received evidence which raised a number of concerns regarding workforce issues in some AEC divisional offices. These concerns related to employment structure, staffing levels, career opportunities for staff, retention issues and the effectiveness of co-located divisional offices.
Specific concerns came from the co-located divisional office in Chatswood, which services four electoral divisions in NSW. The Committee conducted a site visit of the Chatswood office as part of its inquiry, and appreciated the opportunity to speak directly with AEC employees about some of the issues identified in submissions.
Without an extensive body of evidence to draw on, however, it is difficult for the committee to determine whether the concerns raised during the inquiry are symptomatic of widespread issues within the AEC. While the committee is not in a position to draw comprehensive conclusions, it considers the concerns which were raised to be significant enough to warrant further investigation. Therefore the committee has recommended that the Auditor-General examine the issue of workforce planning in the AEC in further detail.
The committee was also asked to consider whether the National Tally Room should be maintained beyond the next federal election. The committee supports the continuation of the tally room and is of the view that the abolition of the tally room would have a negative impact on the perception of the transparency of elections. Furthermore, the committee notes the value and logic of having a central tally room in the nation’s capital which extends beyond any dollar or logistical considerations.
On behalf of the committee I would like to thank all those who participated in the inquiry.
Sophie Mirabella MP
Chair
Membership of the Committee
Chair |
Mrs Sophie Mirabella MP |
|
Deputy Chair |
Senator Glenn Sterle |
|
Members |
Mr Steven Ciobo MP |
Senator Judith Adams |
|
Mr Michael Danby MP |
Senator Kim Carr |
|
Mr John Forrest MP |
Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells |
|
Mr Alan Griffin MP |
Senator Andrew Murray |
Committee Secretariat
Secretary |
Mr Stephen Boyd |
Inquiry Secretary |
Mr Justin Baker |
Research Officer |
Ms Judith Ireland |
Administrative Officers |
Ms Frances Wilson |
|
Ms Natasha Petrovic |
Terms of Reference
- the adequacy of AEC co-location of divisional offices, including both financial and social consequences of co-locations;
- the number of staff and the employment structure of staff in divisional offices;
- whether the current arrangements meet career expectations for AEC officers;
- whether the current arrangements meet community expectations about the appropriate use of staffing resources;
- what any change to these arrangements would mean for the previous two points;
- what level of staffing would be required to meet ongoing habitation reviews;
- whether the current APS staffing levels are appropriate for the actual work of divisional offices; and
- any other issues relating to the staffing of divisional and central offices which may be raised in submission or by the committee;
- the continuing relevance of the National Tally Room to members of parliament, candidates, political parties, the media, and the general public;
- the possible alternatives to the National Tally Room flowing from advances in computer and telecommunications technologies, such as the Australian Electoral Commission's web-based Virtual Tally Room, and;
- the logistics, risks and cost of providing the National Tally room.
List of abbreviations
AEC |
Australian Electoral Commission |
AEO |
Australian Electoral Officer |
CPSU |
Community and Public Sector Union (PSU Group) |
CRU |
Continuous Roll Update |
DOFA |
Department of Finance and Administration |
DRO |
Divisional Returning Officer |
ELMS |
Election Management System |
FTE |
full-time equivalent |
JSCEM |
Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters |
NTR |
National Tally Room |
VTR |
Virtual Tally Room |
List of recommendations
2 Adequacy of divisional office employment structure
Recommendation 1 (para 2.52)
The committee recommends that the Auditor‑General conduct an audit of workforce planning in the Australian Electoral Commission, with a view to determining whether the Commission’s workforce planning strategy is supporting effective practices in human resource management for divisional office staff and achieving efficient and effective outcomes.
3 Divisional offices with shared premises
Recommendation 2 (para 3.80)
The committee recommends that, as part of the audit on workforce planning in the Australian Electoral Commission proposed in Recommendation 1, the Auditor-General also examine the efficiency and effectiveness of working arrangements in co‑located divisional offices.
Recommendation 3 (para 3.81)
The committee recommends that the Australian Electoral Commission includes an evaluation of the performance of all co-located divisional offices in the upcoming federal election in its submission to the JSCEM inquiry into the conduct of the 2007 federal election.
4 The future of the National Tally Room
Recommendation 4 (para 4.67)
The committee recommends that the Australian Government ensures that the National Tally Room is retained for future federal elections.
Back to top