Chapter 2 Centre for Accelerator Science and extension to facilities for
the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW
2.1
The proposed construction of a Centre for Accelerator Science, and the
extensions to the Bragg Institute and OPAL Reactor buildings for the Australian
Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), aim to provide facilities
for new Accelerator Mass Spectrometry and Ion Beam Analysis, as well as
additional offices, laboratories workshops and assembly areas at ANSTO’s Lucas
Heights site in Sydney, NSW. The estimated cost of the project is $62.5 million
(including GST).
2.2
The proposal was referred to the Committee on 25 February 2010.
Conduct of the inquiry
2.3
The inquiry was advertised in The Australian and submissions
sought from those with a direct interest in the project. The Committee received
four submissions and two confidential supplementary submissions detailing the
project costs. A list of submissions can be found at Appendix A.
2.4
The Committee undertook a site inspection, public hearing and an
in-camera hearing on the project costs on 9 April 2010 in Sydney. The hearings
were held in the council room of the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science
and Engineering, publicly accessible and adjacent to the ANSTO visitors centre.
2.5
The transcript of the public hearing as well as the submissions to the
inquiry are available on the Committee’s website.[1]
Plans for the proposed works are detailed in Submission 1: ANSTO.
Need for works
2.6
The ANSTO submission states the need for works as:
n the Centre for
Accelerator Science (CAS) will house two new world-class accelerators, along
with associated laboratories, workshops and offices. The accelerators will be
used to conduct research that is prominent within the National Research
Priorities;
n the Bragg Institute
extensions will provide sufficient office, laboratory, assembly, amenity and
meeting-room space to service planned new Neutron Beam Instruments, as well as
allowing for the consolidation of deuteration facilities currently spread
across the site; and
n the OPAL Reactor
building extensions will accommodate all parts of Reactor Operations in the
Reactor building, which will improve efficiency of staff, provide space for
increased production of radioisotopes, as well as vacate ageing buildings
scheduled for demolition.
2.7
The Committee finds that there is a need for the proposed works.
Scope of works
2.8
The proposed scope of the works is detailed in Submission 1: ANSTO. In
short the project proposes the following:
Centre for Accelerator Science
2.9
The Centre for Accelerator Science will comprise two buildings,
incorporating:
n accelerator hall and
associated plant rooms, control room, technical work areas and user
laboratories (total 1986 m2);
n Accelerator Mass
Spectrometry Chemistry laboratories, including office space and staff common
areas (total 912 m2);
n Uranium Series
Laboratories, including instruments (total 394 m2); and
n visitor display area,
particularly for school and tour groups to view facilities.
2.10
During the site inspection, the Committee noted that ANSTO had not made
a final determination about the number of buildings to be constructed for the CAS.
At the hearing, the Committee was told that ANSTO was awaiting architectural
costings to determine the most cost-efficient building solution.[2]
2.11
ANSTO has since made a supplementary submission advising the Committee
of its final decision regarding the layout of the Centre, outlined above. It is
fundamental that projects are developed to an appropriate level of detail when
referred for inquiry, particularly as failure to do so can delay the Committee
reporting on projects.
Bragg Institute
2.12
The Bragg Institute project comprises major extensions to the Neutron
Guide Hall and Bragg Institute building, (building numbers 82 & 87
respectively) entailing:
n 3360 m2 of
floor space, providing accommodation for approximately 150 people;
n assembly areas,
laboratories and offices, including biodistribution, imaging and cell structure
laboratories;
n a basement which will
house a future carpark; and
n a new enclosed linkway
between buildings 83 and 87.
OPAL Reactor
2.13
The OPAL Reactor project comprises:
n an extension to the
existing OPAL Reactor building (building number 80), providing an additional 2388
m2 floor space, and 283 m2 of minor refurbishment;
n within those areas
laboratory, workshop and office accommodation for:
§
Engineering and Maintenance Facilities (including the Instrument
and Control group);
§
Nuclear Analysis group;
§
IT Services group;
§
Technical Support group;
§
Target and Canning group;
§
Training group; and
§
Utilisation group.
2.14
Construction is due to commence in December 2010 and be completed in
late 2012.
2.15
The Committee finds that the proposed scope of works is suitable to meet
the needs of the ANSTO project.
Cost of works
2.16
The total estimated out-turn cost for this project is $62.5 million including
GST. The Committee received a confidential supplementary submission detailing
the project costs and took evidence in the in-camera hearing regarding the
project costs.
2.17
The Committee notes that, if project savings are made, they will be delivered
back to ANSTO’s central fund. The Committee understands that there are
extensions to the project scope that could then be funded, such as an increase
in the voltage of accelerators for the new Centre for Accelerator Science.[3]
2.18
The Committee is satisfied that the costings for the project provided to
it are adequate, and suitable contingency planning is in place to ensure budget
overruns in any one area do not compromise the project as a whole.
Project issues
Strategic planning
2.19
During its site inspection and public hearing, the Committee discussed
ANSTO’s internal planning structures. In particular, ANSTO has recently
developed a ‘site plan’ for the next 45 years, that is until 2055.[4]
The plan will enable ANSTO to make prudent site-wide decisions about the
footprint of new buildings, and the Committee is pleased to note that the three
projects currently under consideration form part of the 45-year plan.
2.20
While it is concerning that ANSTO has never before had such a plan, the
Committee is pleased to note its inception and is encouraged by the
enthusiastic acceptance of it by staff. This kind of long-term planning is
particularly important for an organisation like ANSTO, as its research
equipment generally has a long lifetime, and some low-level radioactive waste
is produced and stored onsite.[5]
2.21
Scientific research organisations develop and maintain equipment and
infrastructure that is often unique in Australia. In addition, scientific
instruments are generally built at the ‘bleeding edge’ of design.[6]
For these reasons, such organisations must often rely on internal expertise and
collaboration, making organisational planning absolutely fundamental to the
success of new equipment and infrastructure. This planning is also crucial to
ensure that publicly funded research is sustainable and provides value for
money. The Committee commends ANSTO on its renewed attention to long-term
planning.
Committee comment
2.22
The research undertaken by ANSTO spans a wide range of fields, including:
n climate and
environmental science, nuclear safeguards and forensics, human history;[7]
n materials science and
structural biology; [8] and
n life sciences,
medicine, chemistry, engineering science, medical, physical and radiation
physics.[9]
2.23
As well as its scientific research, ANSTO makes significant
contributions to medicine. The most important of these contributions is the
production of Molybdenum-99, which is a precursor material to Technetium-99m,
used for medical nuclear-imaging in hospitals around the world. Whilst much of
the world’s supply of Molybdenum-99 has to date been produced in Canada, there
is a looming international shortage.[10]
2.24
ANSTO indicated at the public hearing that it would be seeking
regulatory approval from the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety
Agency (ARPANSA) to produce more Molybdenum-99 in the short term.[11]
ANSTO also indicated its desire to be a bigger contributor to
radiopharmaceutical production in the long-term.[12]
2.25
The Committee reiterates the importance of the scientific research
carried out by ANSTO, and also underlines the practical contribution ANSTO
makes to medicine. The proposals before the Committee all contribute to ANSTO’s
ability to continue its research and production, and highlight the contribution
made by public research organisations to Australia and the world.
2.26
Overall, the Committee is satisfied that this project has merit in terms
of need, scope and cost.
2.27
Having examined the purpose, need, use, revenue and public value of the
work, the Committee considers that it is expedient that the proposed works
proceed.
Recommendation 1 |
|
The Committee recommends that the House of Representatives resolve,
pursuant to Section 18(7) of the Public Works Committee Act 1969, that
it is expedient to carry out the following proposed work: Construction of
Centre for Accelerator Science and extension to facilities for the Australian
Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW.
|