Dissenting report — Coalition Members and Senators
Chapter 6 – Extradition Treaty between Australia and the Republic of India,
and Treaty between Australia and the Republic of India on Mutual Legal
Assistance in Criminal Matters
The Coalition Members dissent from the majority
Recommendation 4.
Recommendation 4 says that extradition agreements must
require the requesting country to provide regular trial, health and conditions
of detention reports to Australian officials.
This recommendation while pious is unrealistic. It is
doubtful that any country would accept such a reporting procedure and it is
likely to greatly delay if not prevent future signing of extradition treaties.
Moreover the Government are in agreement with the
Coalition’s analysis of Recommendation 4.
In evidence before the Committee the Government outlined
their concerns as referenced in the Report 6.29. It states:
- there is no precedent for a monitoring process;
- an attempt to negotiate such a process will be rejected by
treaty partners;
- Australians who have been extradited have access to
consular assistance if they request it;
- Australia has no jurisdiction to monitor the conditions of
foreign nationals extradited from Australia; and
- if Australia undertook the monitoring process, this would
involve issues of resources and infringement of the sovereignty of the
country in which the person is detained.
Equally Recommendation 4 is not necessary whilst
Recommendation 5 stands.
Recommendation 5 states that Australians who have been
extradited should receive consular support if requested.
Recommendation 5 will fulfil the intent of Recommendation 4
in regard to the well being of the extradited person.
Senator Julian McGauran
Deputy Chair
Senator Simon Birmingham
Senator Michaelia Cash
Mr John Forrest MP
Mr Luke Simpkins MP
Mr Jamie Briggs MP