House of Representatives Committees

Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Workplace Relations

Inquiry into the Role of Institutes of TAFE
Submissions

This document has been scanned from the original printed submission. It may contain some errors

Submission 91

Submission by:
Ron Seidel
Executive Manager
Faculty of Engineering
Regency Institute
Days Road
REGENCY PARK SA 5010

8 January 1998

Summary

It is contended that Australia is a country with considerable geographic, economic and cultural diversity, and requires a flexible approach to the provision of education and training services. The basic task before educational institutions is the same, though the basis on which they carry out this task will vary between institutions and within institutions, largely affected by historical development, current capabilities, local or regional needs and available resources.

Universities and TAFE institutes are perceived to being on a multi parameter continuum, and while there may be clear functional differences between universities in general and TAFE Institutes in general, there will be overlap in specific cases. This overlap should give little concern provided that it is not dysfunctional to the effective provision of educational services to the people of Australia. It is suggested that universities, TAFE institutes and other providers be seen as a system of education and training providers working together to meet the educational needs of all Australians. This multi dimensional collaborative model should also provide competitive advantage in the export of education and training services. To impose a single model of a university and of a TAFE institute would not recognise the diversity of Australia, and would not contribute to the developmental needs of this country.

Introduction

Regency Institute of TAFE is a major provider of vocational education and training in engineering, information technology, hospitality, community services and business services in South Australia. The Faculty of Engineering has approximately 200 teaching staff, offering courses from introductory to Advanced Diploma, and collaborates with the three universities in South Australia to offer a 5 year undergraduate M Eng (IT&T) and other programs. It is expected that a three year degree in Engineering Technology will be introduced in the near future. Award courses are conducted overseas under franchise arrangements. Regency Institute a joint owner with the three universities in South Australia of the Australian Information Technology Engineering Centre.

The author holds a degree in engineering and post graduate qualifications in computer science and education, and has had over 30 years experience in teaching in TAFE and in educational management. The author has had the opportunity to compare the development of vocational education and training in Australia to that in a number of other countries and has presented papers in the area.

This is an individual Submission and need not reflect the views of Regency Institute or TAFE SA.

Submission

1. The task before all educational institutions is essentially the same, namely:

2. Debate on roles

The role of schools and universities have been debated for centuries. but this is not true for institutes of vocational education and training. and in particular TAFE institutes. It will probably be some time before the debate in Australia on the role and practices of TAFE institutes can reach the level of the debate surrounding schools and universities. There are organisations elsewhere which have an established capability to research and debate issues relating to vocational education and training, for example the Bundesunstitut fur Berufsbildung (BiBB) in Germany.

The debate about schools and universities has been in both academic circles and the informed press, for example, the Economist of October 4 1997 (Economist, Vol 345, no 8037, 4-10 October, insert) had an interesting article summarising a number of issues regarding the development and contemporary role of universities.

The roles of the various entities within education are constantly changing in response to prevailing educational philosophy and practice, and to social, political and economic influences. These influences are often in conflict with each other.

With the internationalisation of commerce and education, Australia needs to be adequately consistent with the educational structures and practices of other countries so that it can easily share learning resources, and academic debate and intellectual development.

3. Physical and functional traits

It is necessary to differentiate between the physical existence of an educational Organisation and its functions.

An educational Organisation may be a 'university' in name but may offer many programs that are not consistent with an accepted educational context of a university and yet this may be in the best interests of the community. Many universities around the world offer programs which in the Australian context are clearly in the TAFE sector, for example universities in the Scandinavian countries and in South East Asia. While TAFE institutes are well established in Australia and their equivalent in some other countries, a system of unique vocational education and training institutions is not a feature of all countries.

4. Education and training

It has some times been claimed that universities are concerned with education and TAFE institutes with training, or is has been implied that education is of general nature and training is of a specific (vocational) nature.

Probably a more useful concept is to see education and training as complementary learning processes whereby information, gained through any of a number of mechanisms, is internalised as knowledge with skills being the outward manifestation of the knowledge. Education is a divergent learning process whereby people maximise their individual differences and the learning outcomes for different people in the same learning environment will be quite different. Education can lead to innovation, process improvement and a high level of problem solving capability because it encourages the exploration of alternative ideas unconstrained by current thinking. Training on the other hand is a convergent learning process whereby the effect of individual differences is minimised and learning constrained to essentially the same learning outcomes for all students. Training will tend to lead to professionally and socially accepted outcomes, but tends to entrench current practice. Education and training are complementary learning processes. both are 'right' and both are necessary. One might hope that a surgeon is properly trained to carry out a complex operation but equally hope that the person has been at the same time educated to perceive improved medical procedures.

It is noted that many universities are introducing work/industrial experience. cooperative levitating and other learning environments to provide students with some skills to ‘be able to do it’, essentially training, while TAFE institutes are (or will need to) increase the level of education in their course offerings to counter the rapidly changing nature of work and jobs.

While universities in general may concentrate more on education than training, and TAFE institutes more on training than education. the education-training parameter is not all adequate differentiator between the functions of universities and TAFE institutes.

5. Academic standards

Academic standards are indicated by the level routine processes and repetition on the one hand and the level of hypothesis, analysis and synthesis on the other. Study that requires a high level of hypothesis, analysis and synthesis would be considered to be at a higher academic level than study which involves well established knowledge routine processes and repetition.

Some degree courses and even some post graduate courses offered by universities have quite low demands for hypothesis, analysis and synthesis, and are often comparable with or even below that expected in some courses in TAFE institutes. While in general universities work at a higher academic level than TAFE institutes this parameter alone is not a sufficient differentiator of function and role.

6. Research

Universities are a major research agency in Australia and part of the funding that they received is based on this function. The research traditionally has tended to be leading edge though there have always been valuable components of applied research. It is suspected that because of economic pressures and sponsorship the ratio of leading edge to applied research is changing. Universities around the world are often differentiated by their research priorities and achievements. In many areas, but certainly not all, teaching is based on research experiences and outcomes.

TAFE institutes have no tradition of research, either leading edge or applied, even though there are good opportunities for research into technology development and educational practice and which would contribute to the intellectual capability of Australia. There are a number of factors currently n-mitigating against the development of a research culture in TAFE institutes, for example, misconceptions about the nature and processes of research, senior management with no empathy for research, the pressure for productivity and the constraints of national curriculum.

A research capability in TAFE institutes would enhance the learning environment for students and provide professional diversity for staff, and will become increasingly important given the rapid changes in technology and the evolution of work practices. Teaching staff in TAFE institutes need to be mentored in research processes. An example of such research is the recent project completed by the Faculty of Engineering at Regency Institute, A Cultural Context for the Development of Career Entry Technical Training for Aboriginal People. The research findings have been internationally recognised and have resulted in successful pilot programs for Aboriginal people.

The role of research and its consequential effect on teaching is a functional differentiator between universities and TAFE institutes.

7. Vocational education and training

Vocational education and training occurs in both universities and TAFE institutes, and perhaps even to a similar extent.

In universities, courses in engineering, law, medicine and accountancy, for example have very strong vocational components. and if anything these vocational components are being strengthened as the competition by graduates for jobs increases. It is probably the case that in TAFE Institutes the vocational outcomes are more applicable in the short term than in universities though it is suggested that the strengthening of the vocational outcomes in university courses is in terms of immediately applicable (short term) competencies.

Universities also offer courses that do not have such strong direct vocational outcomes. for example in file humanities and the liberal arts, and in no way is it suggested that such courses are not valuable and do not contribute to the capability of the community. Graduates of such courses may develop careers well removed from their field of study and often bring all alternative and valuable perspective to the work environment. There is no large scale equivalent in TAFE Institutes in Australia at the present time, though the General National Vocational Qualifications (GNVQs) in technical colleges in England are largely general in nature; a general education film a vocational flavour but not work place specific.

It is strongly suggested that there is a gap in education and training provision in Australia. There is a large number of school leavers for whom immediate employment is not likely and yet who do not have available to them appropriate education services. Universities are not an option for these young people because of their school achievement and TAFE courses, through national curriculum developments, have become intrinsically linked to the immediate workplace. There is an immediate need for suitable study programs for the young otherwise unemployed and it is suggested that such programs should have a strong educational component and be less concerned about specific job training as has been common practice in the past. The rapid adoption in less than 5 years of the GNVQs in England which provide learning opportunities for this group of (usually) young people should be carefully noted. It is of interest that some 50% of university entrants in England now come from the GNVQ stream rather than from the school A level stream.

Both universities and TAFE institutes have (or should have) vocational and general education components and the relative proportion of the vocational and general components are likely to be of the same order. The roles of universities and TAFE institutes probably cannot be adequately differentiated on the general vocational parameter.

8. Community needs

There is an expectation that the educational needs of a community whether it be in the central business district of a large city or in remote Australia will be met as far as is possible. Economic constraints will determine the range of educational services available, but whether these services are provided by a university, a TAFE institute, a school, a private provider, some community agency or some of these in collaboration is not of primary importance. It is quite a realistic expectation that students in a remote town, perhaps Ceduna in South Australia, should be able to enrol for a university degree course, say Bachelor of Arts or a Bachelor of Business, and be able to study some subjects locally, perhaps organised and delivered through the local TAFE campus using whatever technology is available. Obviously the study must be credible but this does not mean that it has to be the same as that available on-campus in some metropolitan university. There are many examples in Australia of such collaborations to meet community needs and these initiatives should be applauded and become an accepted process.

9. Collaboration

The collaboration between schools, TAFE institutes and universities has been increasing in recent years in particular in regional Australia and the smaller cities, in part in response to the decreasing number of students and reducing resources. There appears to be a number of conditions that need to be satisfied for successful collaboration, for example:

Collaborations can be both informal and formal. Informal collaborations may involve sharing ideas. joint activities such as Summer Schools and school promotion. sharing (including cost recovery) intellectual properly and physical resources. and in particular mutual respect and support. Formal collaborations may be agreements and contracts.

It is suggested that specific purpose collaborations are likely to be more productive than some form of general collaboration.

Obviously in the present environment collaborating partners need to recognise and manage competition between them selves. It is contended that if the environment is essentially competition driven then any collaboration will be marginal. Educational organisations should appreciate that in spite of increasing consultancy and other income generating activities, that they essentially community resource based and that the community expects that they will use those resources efficiently and effectively to the benefit of the community.

It is suggested that examples of successful collaborations are those between Regency Institute and the University of Adelaide on their Graduate Entrepreneurial Initiative (an informal collaboration) and between Regency Institute, the University of Adelaide, the University of South Australia and the Flinders University on the Australian Information Technology Engineering Centre.

10. Access

Just as universities have some unique roles, so do TAFE institutes and one of these roles is the provision of flexible access programs for those students who for what ever reason have limited educational achievement or who are new to this country. Often these participants have had negative learning experiences and low self esteem and this can strongly influence their personal lives and their performance at work. Many, with encouragement, mentoring and sensitive, realistic counselling can achieve significant milestones, not just raising the option of higher study but enhanced work opportunities and better family relationships. This country cannot afford the luxury of not effectively developing and using all the human resource potential available.

11. Culture

There are differences in the culture of universities and TAFE institutes. Universities have a history back to the 12th century if not earlier and are found in most countries of the world. TAFE institutes are a relatively new development and while relatively well established in Australia and the equivalent in some other countries, are by no means universal.

The old well established universities, the newer universities (ex CAEs etc), large metropolitan TAFE institutes and regional TAFE institutes all have different profiles and culture brought about by traditions, funding sources, administrative procedures, staff capabilities, facilities, and community needs. There will generally be a clear difference in the culture and role of the well established central business district universities and regional TAFE institutes, but the differences will be much less between the established universities and the newer universities, or between the newer universities and the large metropolitan TAFE institutes.

Some institutions because of their specialisation may need to serve the educational needs of a whole state or perhaps all of Australia, whereas others might be more concerned to properly address the educational needs of their geographic region. University A in geographic region Y could well have some educational service the same as in TAFE institute B in geographic region Z. However one would need to at least question the efficiency of more than one institution in the same geographic region offering comparable study programs.

It is not an issue that an institution with a particular profile is preferred to another, or that one is better than another, but rather that all are working together in some form of collaboration to efficiently and effectively serve the educational needs of the country. Diversity and flexibility in educational provision is necessary to serve diverse Australia.

12. Conclusion

Australia is a diverse country with diverse education and training needs. It is contended that the tasks of educational institutions whether universities or TAFE institutes is the same; educational credibility and effectiveness.

Universities and TAFE institutes share many common traits and few parameters are exclusively the domain of a particular education sector. There is no clear cut division between universities and TAFE institutes, nor should there be as this would most likely. be dysfunctional to the provision of educational services to all of Australia.

Universities have teaching that is more research based, more academically demanding and less oriented to short term vocational outcomes than TAFE institutes. TAFE institutes have teaching that accommodates diverse student backgrounds and 'second chancers', are more flexible in educational provision and more oriented to short term learning goals. Some study programs are clearly the province of universities and some clearly the province of TAFE institutes, and there are many that might be offered by either, not on the basis of competition but for efficiency and regional educational needs. Universities and TAFE institutes are complementary and together must ensure that the educational needs of the community are met.

Back to top

We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledge their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and voices of deceased people.