|
Footnotes
Chapter 1 Introduction
[1]
The Act, Part III, Section 18 (8). Exemptions from this requirement are
provided for work of an urgent nature, defence work contrary to the public
interest, repetitive work, and work by prescribed authorities listed in the
Regulations.
[2]
The Act, Section 5.
[3]
The Act, Section 17.
[4]
<www.aph.gov.au/pwc>
Chapter 2 Construction of a new Australian Embassy, Jakarta, Indonesia
[1]
<www.aph.gov.au/pwc>
[2]
Submission 1: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), p. 1
[3]
Mr P. Davin, DAFT, Proof Transcript of Evidence, p. 3
[4]
Submission 1, DFAT, p. 5-6
[5]
Mr P. Davin, DFAT, Proof Transcript of Evidence, 4 August 2009, p. 3, 8.
[6]
Submission 1, DFAT, p. 20-21.
[7]
Mr P. Davin, DFAT, Proof Transcript of Evidence, 4 August 2009, p. 2
[8]
Report 2/2009
[9]
Mr J. Denton, Denton Corker Marshall Pty Ltd, Proof Transcript of
Evidence, 4 August 2009, p. 6
[10]
Mr J. Denton, Denton Corker Marshall Pty Ltd, Proof Transcript of Evidence,
4 August 2009, p. 6
[11]
Mr J. Denton, Denton Corker Marshall Pty Ltd, Proof Transcript of Evidence,
4 August 2009, p. 6
[12]
Mr P. Davin, DFAT, Proof Transcript of Evidence, 4 August 2009, p. 8.
[13]
Concurrent documentation is the preparation of contract documentation prior
to completion of the Committee’s inquiry and report to Parliament. All
documentation must be clear the project remains subject to Parliamentary
approval. The Committee only approves requests for concurrent documentation
when the evidence provided to it of sufficient quality that the Committee can
completely satisfy itself as to the merits of the project and the capacity of
the agency to undertake the works.
Back to top
|