Chapter 4 Taxation Agreement with Belgium
Introduction
4.1
The Second Protocol Amending the Agreement between Australia and the
Kingdom of Belgium for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of
Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income will update the Exchange of
Information (EOI) provisions (Article 26) in the Agreement between Australia
and the Kingdom of Belgium for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the
Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income.
4.2
The provisions are intended to improve the ability of the Australian
Taxation Office (ATO) to exchange information with Belgium authorities by:
n expanding the taxes
in respect of which information may be exchanged to all federal taxes rather
than just the income taxes covered under the existing Agreement; and
n ensuring that neither
Belgium nor Australia’s tax authorities can refuse to provide the information
solely because they do not have a domestic interest in such information, or
because a bank or similar institution holds the information.[1]
Obligations
4.3
Article 1(1) obliges both Parties to exchange information where such
information is foreseeably relevant for carrying out the provisions of the
Agreement or to the administration and enforcement of each Party’s domestic tax
laws.[2]
4.4
Such information shall be treated as secret in the same manner as
information obtained under the domestic laws of that State. However,
information received may be used for other purposes when the laws of both
countries permit this and the tax authority supplying the information
authorises this (Article 1(2)).[3]
4.5
Article 1(3) provides for either Party to decline a request for
information in certain circumstances, for example, if the information would
disclose a trade or business secret or breach human rights obligations.[4]
Reasons to take treaty action
4.6
Treasury submitted that the Second Protocol will update the current
Agreement with Belgium and bring it into line with the internationally agreed
tax standards developed by the OECD. Treasury considered that Belgium’s
commitment to implement full EOI on tax matters is a positive step in its
relationship with Australia.[5]
4.7
Treasury also considered that this Protocol further demonstrates the
Australian Government’s commitment to supporting global action on improving
information exchange and transparency.[6]
4.8
Treasury told the Committee that the updated Protocol will help to
counteract existing bank secrecy provisions which contribute to tax evasion by compelling
each tax administration to supply relevant information even if it is not
required for their domestic taxation purposes.[7]
Exchange of information
4.9
The Committee requested clarification on the mechanics of the exchange
of taxation information between Australia and Belgium. Treasury advised that
the exchange is usually on an ad hoc basis but that tax authorities in
either country may decide to pass on relevant information if they are aware
that it is of interest to tax authorities in the other country.[8]
4.10
Treasury further advised that to ensure security and privacy provisions
are met, the exchange of taxpayer data is done in accordance with the
Protective Security Manual published by the Attorney-General’s Department and
the Australian Government Information and Communication Technology Security
Manual (ACSI33) published by the Defence Signals Directorate.[9]
Costs and implementation
4.11
Treasury advised that the estimated revenue impact of the updated EOI
Article in the Second Protocol is unquantifiable. However, since the Second
Protocol seeks to expand the scope of taxpayer information available to the
Australian Taxation Office, the proposal is expected to increase taxpayer
compliance and therefore tax revenue.[10]
4.12
As the existing Exchange of Information Unit within the ATO will be able
to handle any EOI requests there will only be minimal increases in
administrative costs to the ATO as a result of the enhanced information
exchange between Australia and Belgium. There is expected to be little or no
change in ongoing compliance costs for Australian taxpayers.[11]
4.13
The implementation of the Second Protocol will require amendment to the International
Tax Agreements Act 1953 to give the Second Protocol the force of law in
Australia. The amendment will be effected prior to the Second Protocol entering
into force in Australia. The implementation of the Protocol will not affect the
existing roles of the Commonwealth or the States and Territories in tax
matters.[12]
Consultations
4.14
Relevant Commonwealth Ministers, the ATO and State/Territory Governments
were consulted in development of the Agreement. No public consultation took
place as the negotiations for the Agreement were not public.[13]
Conclusions and recommendations
4.15
The Committee recognises the importance of updating and enhancing
taxation agreements with countries such as Belgium in the interests of
increasing tax transparency. The Committee therefore supports binding treaty
action being taken.
Recommendation 4 |
|
The Committee supports the Second Protocol amending the
Agreement between the Kingdom of Belgium and Australia for the Avoidance of
Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on
Income and recommends that binding treaty action be taken.
|