Audit Report No. 17 2008-2009
Chapter 6 Administration of Job Network Outcome Payments
Background
6.1
In May 1998, the Government replaced the Commonwealth Employment Service
with the Job Network Program, which is now managed by the Department of
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR).
6.2
Under the Job Network Program, DEEWR does not provide employment
services directly to job seekers. Rather, it purchases the provision of services
to job seekers from a national network of government and non-government
organisations. These are:
n Centrelink, the
Australian Government organisation responsible for administering social
security entitlements. DEEWR pays Centrelink for services it delivers to job
seekers under a Business Partnership Agreement. Centrelink provides services to
job seekers, including assessing job seekers’ relative labour market
disadvantage and referring job seekers to Job Network Members (JNMs); and
n JNMs, which comprise
not-for-profit and commercial organisations that have been contracted by DEEWR
to help eligible job seekers gain employment. There are currently some 100 JNMs
operating at approximately 1,150 locations throughout Australia. Under
Employment Services Contracts (ESC), DEEWR paid JNMs
$1,030 million in 2007–08 to deliver Job Network services.
The Active Participation Model
6.3
The Job Network Program is in its eleventh year of operation and is
currently based on the Employment Services Contract 2006–2009 (ESC 2006–2009).
The ESC 2006–2009 gives effect to the Active Participation Model (APM) which
was designed to simplify access to services for job seekers and to link
services provided by Centrelink, JNMs and related service providers.
6.4
Under the APM, job seekers remain continuously engaged in employment
assistance until they find suitable employment or undertake a qualifying
education course. After three months, most job seekers who remain unemployed
receive specialised one-on-one assistance from a JNM. This assistance, referred
to as Intensive Support, starts with job search training. Job seekers who
remain in a position of being unable to find work after six months of
unemployment move into a period of mutual obligation, involving participation
in Work for the Dole or other programs, and then move onto customised
assistance involving a more intensive form of personalised assistance to
disadvantaged job seekers.
6.5
The services provided by JNMs and the mutual obligation activities form
a continuum of service which increases with intensity the longer a job seeker
remains unemployed.
Job Network Program payments
6.6
Under Job Network, a JNM can receive four major types of payment or
reimbursement:
n job placements—fees
paid to a JNM when a job seeker secures ongoing sustainable employment through
a job placement organisation such as a JNM;
n jobseeker
account—reimbursement of costs associated with assisting a registered job
seeker to obtain sustainable employment;
n service fees—payments
made to JNMs for specific services delivered to individual job seekers
including: commencement of Intensive Support job search training (ISjst);
commencement of both the first and second periods of Intensive Support
customised assistance (ISca); and a set fee called the Quarterly Service Fee;
and
n outcome payments—
payment made when a job seeker achieves an employment or education outcome.
Outcome Payments
6.7
DEEWR pays JNMs an outcome payment when a job seeker allocated to them
achieves an employment or education outcome that meets the contractual requirements
as detailed in the department’s Employment Services Contract (ESC) 2006–2009.
6.8
Where a JNM actively matches a job seeker to a vacancy, DEEWR
characterises this as a positive outcome. After the job seeker has remained in
continuous employment or a qualifying education course for a set period and
satisfied their participation requirements or reduced their reliance on income
support, DEEWR pays the JNM an outcome payment for the placement. An interim
outcome payment is paid to the JNM after the job seeker has been in continuous
employment for 13 weeks or has undertaken a qualifying education course for one
semester. A final outcome payment is paid after 26 weeks continuous employment
or two semesters of a qualifying education course.
6.9
Outcome payments form a large proportion of the expenditure made as part
of the Job Network Program. In 2007–08, DEEWR paid approximately $386 million
to JNMs for outcome payments out of a total program expenditure of $1,030
million.
6.10
The amount DEEWR pays an individual JNM for assisting a job seeker into
employment or qualifying education course is determined by the length of time
the job seeker has been unemployed and the job seeker’s level of disadvantage.
6.11
DEEWR uses four different periods of unemployment when paying an outcome
payment. The first commences after a job seeker has been unemployed for three
months and has commenced receiving Intensive Support services. The four periods
are: four months to 12 months; 13 months to 24 months; 25 months to 36 months;
and registered for 37 months or longer.
6.12
The purpose of dividing the outcome payments into the different periods
is to encourage and reward JNMs for achieving sustainable employment or
education outcomes for the longer term unemployed and those job seekers
considered to be Highly Disadvantaged, rather than focusing the majority of
their efforts on the shorter term unemployed, who have a better chance of
gaining employment.
The audit
Audit Objectives
6.13
The objective of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of DEEWR’s
administration of Job Network outcome payments. The ANAO examined DEEWR’s
arrangements to:
n specify Intensive
Support outcome payments, the purpose of the payments and how JNMs can access/claim
the payments;
n provide assurance
that outcome payments are made in accordance with contractual obligations, and
that JNMs who are entitled to receive Intensive Support outcome payments do so;
and
n obtain adequate
assurance that Intensive Support outcome payments are achieving their stated
purpose.
6.14
The audit covered outcome payments associated with Intensive Support
services delivered under the ESC 2006–2009 for eligible job seekers. The audit
did not include outcome payments relating to Australian pensioners or payments
relating to Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) participants.
Audit Conclusions
6.15
The audit report made the following conclusion:
The Job Network is the principal labour market program
administered by DEEWR. Outcome payments are made to JNMs when a registered job
seeker obtains sustainable employment or completes an approved education
course. In 2007–08, outcome payments represented 38 per cent of total payments
to JNMs.
The Job Network is in its eleventh year of operation and
DEEWR administers this mature program effectively. In doing so, the department
has adopted a successful approach to specifying, paying and monitoring outcome
payments.
DEEWR pays JNMs an outcome payment when a job seeker
allocated to them achieves an employment or education outcome that meets the
contractual requirements as detailed in the department’s ESC 2006–2009. The
outcomes that JNMs are contracted to provide to job seekers are appropriately
specified in ESC 2006–2009 and these requirements are translated into clear
guidance material.
Overall, the controls used by DEEWR to administer outcome
payments are effective. These controls are reflected in: the functionality of
DEEWR’s IT system, Employment Assistant 3000 (EA3000); data from Centrelink
based on the information that job seekers provide in their fortnightly
Application for Payment Form; JNMs certifying that they have the evidence to
substantiate their outcome claims; and the department’s contract monitoring
activities to oversight contractual compliance by JNMs. These controls provide
sufficient assurance that outcome payment amounts are made in accordance with
contractual obligations and that actual outcome payments made to JNMs are based
on a job seeker being placed in continuous employment for 13 or 26 weeks or
undertaking a qualifying education course for one or two semesters.
An area that could be strengthened by DEEWR is the clarity of
Job Network performance information provided to external stakeholders. A key
feature in the management of the Job Network has been an increasing emphasis on
paying for outcomes (placements) rather than paying for services (process).
Internally, DEEWR monitors Job Network expenditure outcome payments and service
fees separately. For external reports, including Portfolio Budget Statements
and Annual Reports, DEEWR reports its annual aggregated expenditure on the Job
Network. In this regard, DEEWR could strengthen its reporting of Job Network
performance. This could be achieved through publishing sufficiently disaggregated
and appropriately disclosed Job Network financial and performance information
in the department’s Portfolio Budget Statements and Annual Reports.[1]
ANAO Recommendation
6.16
The ANAO made the following recommendation:
Table 1.1 ANAO Recommendations, Audit Report No. 17
2008-09
1.
|
To improve external understanding of the efficiency and
cost effectiveness of the Job Network, the ANAO recommends that DEEWR
includes in its Annual Reports:
a) disaggregated
financial data on Job Network expenditure including outcome payments and
service fees; and
b) a brief
overview of the methodology used by the department to calculate cost per
employment outcome.
DEEWR response: Agreed
|
The Committee’s review
6.17
The Committee held a public hearing on Wednesday 18 March 2009, with the
following witnesses:
n Australian National
Audit Office (ANAO); and
n Department of
Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations (DEEWR).
6.18
The Committee took evidence on the following issues:
n collection of job
seeker information;
n disaggregation of
financial data; and
n special claims
processing.
Collection of job seeker
information
6.19
The ANAO identified that JNMs were required to collect information from
job seekers about the hours worked and pay received that the job seeker had
already provided to Centrelink on SU19 forms. The JNMs are unable to compel job
seekers to provide this information and have resorted to offering incentives to
encourage cooperation.
6.20
DEEWR informed the Committee that DEEWR and Centrelink are exploring
ways to ensure that information is collected only once and these changes will
be implemented under the new Employment Services Contract to decrease the
administrative burden on JNMs. These changes are due to be introduced with the
new Employment Services Contract on 1 July 2009.
Disaggregation of financial data
6.21
The ANAO reported that DEEWR reported outcome payments and service fees
as a single expenditure. This does not allow external stakeholders to identify
the contributions that outcome payments and services made to the Job Network
expenditure. The ANAO recommended that these figures be reported separately. A
similar recommendation was made in the ANAO Audit Report No.6, 2005-06, Implementation
of Job Network Employment Service Contract 3. The department, at the time
the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR), disagreed with the
recommendation stating:
Job Network is a single programme and is reported as a single
programme in accordance with government policy. DEWR will give consideration to
additional explanatory information, where appropriate, as part of the normal
process of reviewing the presentation of its Annual Report and other
information publications.[2]
6.22
DEEWR’s response to the recent ANAO Audit Report stated that they accept
‘the recommendation on further opportunities to improve external understanding
of the efficiency and cost effectiveness of the Job Network.’[3]
With a new employment service having been announced to commence 1 July 2009, a
new Employment Services Contract will be implemented superseding the Job
Network Outcome Payments. DEEWR’s response to the Audit Report stated that the
recommendation will be addressed in determining reporting arrangements for the
new Job Services Contract. A previous Joint Committee on Public Accounts and
Audit report recommended that ‘DEEWR provide a breakdown of estimates and
actual expenditure on service fees and outcome fees for the Job Network
programme in its annual report.’[4]
6.23
DEEWR informed the Committee at the hearing that the Government is
considering the ANAO’s recommendation and that a final decision had not been
made.
6.24
The Committee is still concerned that interested parties are unable to
assess the success of DEEWR in meeting key objectives or determine the
contributions outcome payments and service fees make to the Job Network
expenditure. Also, any trends that reflect DEEWR’s success in making the
program outcome focused can not be determined according to the ANAO. Both the
ANAO in its report and DEEWR in giving evidence to the Committee stated that
DEEWR already has the systems to produce the requested information.
Recommendation 5 |
|
The Committee recommends that the Department of Education,
Employment and Workplace Relations provide disaggregated financial data on
the estimated and actual expenditure on outcome payments and service fees
paid for the Job Network program in its annual reports.
|
Special claims processing
6.25
The Audit Report highlighted a special claims process used when JNMs are
unable to use the normal auto-claim process to achieve an acceptable result.
The special claims process involves the use of a system override module which
turns off business controls. The claim is submitted by the JNM and then
processed by a DEEWR contract manager. The majority of special claims concern
outcome payments for non-activity tested job seekers such as apprentices.
Special claims represent about 8 per cent of all outcome claims at present.
6.26
DEEWR assured the Committee that:
… in the new employment services that will start from 1 July,
we have done additional work to reduce the number of instances in which there
is a need for special arrangements or special claims process.[5]
6.27
DEEWR estimates that 75 per cent of the 8 per cent of claims that
previously needed to be handled as special claims can now be handled online due
to additional reconciliation processes in place. This increase in automation
allows JNMs more time to service their job seekers.
Conclusion
6.28
The Committee is pleased to see DEEWR addressing some of the issues
identified in the Audit Report in preparing for the new Employment Services
Contract. Changes that reduce the burden placed on JNMs and allow them more
time to place job seekers in work supports the very purpose of this program.
6.29
The Committee is of the opinion that full implementation of its
recommendation and the recommendation made in the Audit Report would provide
external stakeholders with the ability to determine the contribution outcome
payments and services fees had on the Job Network expenditure, and allow for
trend analysis to determine DEEWR’s success in making the program outcome
focused.