Chapter 4 Community Awareness and Vulnerability
Introduction
4.1
This chapter discusses the current level of e-security awareness among Australian
home users and small businesses. The evidence demonstrates a considerable
inconsistency between levels of awareness of e-security threats and actual online
behaviour, indicating that home users and small businesses remain highly
vulnerable to a range of cyber crime types.
Levels of Awareness and Uptake of E-security Measures
4.2
As mentioned previously in this report, there is a wide variety of
inconsistent and often incomparable information on the level of cyber crime
activity due to varying definitions of cyber crime, fragmented intelligence
gathering and the under reporting of cyber crime by victims.[1]
4.3
These data collection issues have also given rise to a number of
conflicting statistics on the level of cyber crime awareness in the Australian
community. While some sources indicate that the level of awareness is high, other
sources show that this does not necessarily translate into better online
practices.
4.4
Evidence to the Committee supports the notion that home users have some
awareness of cyber security risks:
n a July 2009 Australian
Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) survey of Australian home users
between the ages of eight and seventeen found that 75 per cent of respondents
knew not to divulge personal details on the internet;[2]
n a March 2009 ACMA
survey of 1,631 adult home users found that 81 per cent of respondents assessed
their online skills as average or above;[3]
n a 2008 survey by
internet security provider AVG found that 77 per cent of Australian respondents
were aware of the need to regularly update their internet security software; [4]
n a 2006 survey by the Consumers’
Telecommunications Network (CTN) found that almost 90 per cent of respondents
were aware of and understood spam, and more than 66 per cent of respondents
were aware of and understood malware;[5] and
n the same 2006 CTN
survey found the 75 per cent of respondents recognised and did not respond to
scam emails.[6]
4.5
The evidence also suggested that Australian small businesses possess
some understanding of cyber security issues:
n a 2009 global survey
by Symantec of 1,425 small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) found that these
businesses are acutely aware of today’s security risks;[7]
n a 2009 ABS survey of Australian
small businesses found that 85 per cent of respondents used one or more computer
security tools such as anti-virus or encryption software;[8]
and
n a 2006 AusCERT survey
of Australian organisations found that 99 per cent used virus protection and 98
per cent used firewalls.[9]
4.6
However, a range of other evidence indicated that Australian home users
and small businesses still take insufficient precautions against cyber crime.[10]
This evidence includes, for example:
n a March 2009 ACMA
survey of 1,631 adult home users found that only 49 per cent of those who
assessed their online skills as high had installed anti-virus software;[11]
n a 2008 AusCERT survey
of 1,001 Australian adult home users found that 11 per cent of respondents
never update their operating system and eight per cent never update their
anti-virus software; [12]
n the 2008 AusCERT
survey also found that 75 per cent of respondents connect to the internet using
an administrator account and 30 per cent had clicked on links in spam emails
(both of which significantly reduce the effectiveness of computer security
mechanisms);[13]
n the 2009 Symantec
survey of SMEs found that out-of-date or improper security measures each
accounted for over a third of the security breaches against Australian SMEs;[14]
and
n only ten per cent of
respondents to a 2006 AusCERT survey of Australian organisations thought they
were managing all aspects of computer security well.[15]
4.7
The level of cyber crime in Australia demonstrates that end users are
not heeding advice on e-security threats. For example, while the Australian
banking industry said that customers are highly aware of the threat posed by
phishing emails,[16] a 2007 ABS survey
estimated that, in the twelve months prior to the survey, 30,400 Australians
were the victim of online phishing scams.[17]
4.8
Similarly, despite an apparent awareness of the threats posed by
identity theft and fraud, the ABS survey estimated that 76,000 Australians were
victims of online credit card or bank card fraud in the year preceding the
survey.[18]
4.9
Even where end users do take sufficient technical precautions, they may
still fall victim to online scams due to emotional vulnerabilities. For
example, the ACCC informed the Committee of an increasing number of dating or
romance scams.[19] Additionally, the 2006
ABS survey indicated that at least 31,700 Australians were the victims of
online scams in the twelve months prior to the survey.[20]
4.10
The continued impact of romance scams provides a particularly good
example of how knowledge of cyber crime risks is not necessarily translating
into protective actions. The Queensland Police Service (QPS) informed the
Committee that, in the case of romance scams, 76 per cent of victims who lost
large amounts of money continued to willingly participate in such scams despite
being notified by the QPS that they were being victimised.[21]
Similarly, Mr Peter Shenwun, Consular Minister, Nigerian High Commission in
Australia, told the Committee that many victims of advance-fee fraud
originating out of Nigeria seek to continue contact with scammers, despite
being advised not to by Nigerian authorities.[22]
4.11
AusCERT argued that the range of seemingly inconsistent evidence
indicates that home users may hold misconceptions about the level of protection
provided by their security measures. AusCERT’s Home Users Computer Security
Survey 2008 found that:
n 68 percent of people
were confident or very confident in managing their own computer security;
n 92 per cent thought
their ISP should inform customers of malware infections (which does not
necessarily occur); and
n 46 per cent
incorrectly believed that data exchanged with secure websites cannot be
accessed by hackers.[23]
4.12
The Tasmanian Government stated that although there appears to be a
general awareness in the community of the need for some level of protection,
most home users and SMEs do not have adequate security.[24]
4.13
The Australian Computer Society argued that Australians seem to be aware
of, and are taking precautions against, old cyber crime threats but are not
aware of, or taking steps against, new and emerging cyber crime threats.[25]
For example, while users may be installing anti-virus software to combat some
e-security risks, QPS informed the Committee that they observed a 1,000 per
cent increase in the incidence of romance scams between 2006 and 2009.[26]
Issues that contribute to low levels of awareness
4.14
The Committee received evidence on a number of factors that contribute
to the low level of awareness of cyber crime threats among Australia home users
and small businesses:
n limitations of
current educational initiatives;[27]
n a complex public
policy response to cyber crime;[28] and
n inadequate online safety
mechanisms that may not alert end users to new cyber security threats and
attacks.[29]
4.15
These issues, and proposals to deal with them, are examined more
thoroughly in the following chapters.
Committee View
4.16
The Committee considers that the level of awareness of cyber crime
threats among Australian home users and small businesses is insufficient to ensure
their safety online.
4.17
The Committee is of the view that the vulnerability of Australian home
users and small businesses presents a risk to all sections of the Australian
community. The insufficient uptake of simple e-security measures means that
home users and small businesses will continue to be victimised by cyber
criminals. This has direct financial and emotional impacts on the victims
themselves, and exposes other sections of Australia’s ICT systems to attack, including
areas of government.
4.18
Community education and awareness raising is part of the Australian
Government’s Cyber Security Strategy. The adequacy of Australia’s
current initiatives is examined in Chapter 10.