Scrutiny of Bills Alert Digest No. 1 of 1998

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister representing the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs. [Portfolio responsibility: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs]

The bill proposes to amend the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 to:

Retrospectivity
Subclauses 2(2), (3) and (4)

Subclauses 2(2), (3) and (4) of this bill, if enacted, would provide for the amendments proposed in Schedule 1 to have retrospective effect from various dates. It seems to the committee, however, that the amendments are for the purpose of correcting grammatical and other similar errors in the legislation affected and make no substantive change to the law.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on these subclauses.

Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 4 December 1997 by the Minister for Regional Development, Territories and Local Government. [Portfolio responsibility: Regional Development, Territories and Local Government]

The bill proposes to amend the Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 to increase the maximum permissible limit for the grant of new estates to 999 years and remove the provision for prescribing periods longer than 99 years.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Charter of Budget Honesty Bill 1996 [No. 2]

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 5 December 1997 by the Treasurer. It is identical to the bill introduced into the House of Representatives on 11 December 1996 and passed by the Senate, with amendments, on 28 October 1997. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to implement arrangements to require governments to provide regular fiscal and economic reports. Further, the bill proposes that Secretaries to the Treasury and Department of Finance release a pre-election report to provide updated fiscal and economic projections and to publicly release the fiscal impact of announced election commitments as requested by the Government or Opposition.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Commonwealth Superannuation Board Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Finance and Administration. [Portfolio responsibility: Finance and Administration]

The bill proposes to establish a new body corporate, the Commonwealth Superannuation Board, to administer certain Commonwealth superannuation schemes for civilian employees and to manage the Funds of those schemes.

Inappropriate delegation of legislative power Subclause 8(1)

Subclause 8(1) of this bill, if enacted, would permit the Minister to make determinations which would vary the operation of any provision in Acts relating to superannuation for members of the Australian Public Service.

The committee notes that the explanatory memorandum indicates that the variations thus made must not result in the legislation falling outside the terms of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. It appears to the committee that making the Minister's power to make determinations subject to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 sufficiently circumscribes this delegation of legislative power.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this subclause.

Inappropriate delegation of legislative power Subclause 8(9)

Subclause 8(9) of this bill, if enacted, would enable the Minister to give retrospective effect to the determinations which the Minister may make under subclause 8(1). These determinations would vary the operation of any provision in Acts relating to superannuation for members of the Australian Public Service.

The committee notes that the explanatory memorandum points out that the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to which these determinations are subject, does not permit the reduction of benefits to members except in particular circumstances. The committee seeks the advice of the Minister on the particular circumstances in which a determination would be made which would reduce superannuation benefits to which members would otherwise be entitled.

Pending the Minister's advice, the committee draws Senators' attention to the provision, as it may be considered to trespass unduly on personal rights and liberties, in breach of principle 1(a)(i) of the committee's terms of reference.

Company Law Review Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet) to the Prime Minister. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to amend the Corporations Law to:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Criminal Code Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the Senate on 3 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer. [Portfolio responsibility: Justice]

The bill proposes to amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 to bring forward commencement of provisions which relate to the proof of an offence where the accused person is intoxicated. The provisions provide that self-induced intoxication cannot be considered in determining intent or voluntariness in relation to basic offences such as assault.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Customs and Excise Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 3) 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Customs and Consumer Affairs. [Portfolio responsibility: Industry, Science and Tourism]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

Retrospectivity
Subclauses 2(2) and (3)

Subclauses 2(2) and (3) of this bill, if enacted, would provide for the amendments proposed in Schedule 1 to have retrospective effect from various dates. It seems to the committee, however, that the amendments are of a technical nature only and make no substantive change to the law.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on these subclauses.

Electoral and Referendum Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Finance and Administration. [Portfolio responsibility: Finance and Administration]

The bill proposes to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 and Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 to:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Insurance Laws Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 4 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet) to the Prime Minister. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

Commencement
Subclause 2(4)

Subclause 2(4) of this bill provides that almost all of Schedule 2 to this bill will commence on Proclamation, with no date being fixed at which the Bill must come into force or be automatically repealed.

With respect to commencement provisions, the committee has placed importance on the Office of Parliamentary Counsel Drafting Instruction No. 2 of 1989. The Drafting Instruction provides, in part:

3. As a general rule, a restriction should be placed on the time within which an Act should be proclaimed (for simplicity I refer only to an Act, but this includes a provision or provisions of an Act). The commencement clause should fix either a period, or a date, after Royal Assent, (I call the end of this period, or this date, as the case may be, the 'fixed time'). This is to be accompanied by either:

(a) a provision that the Act commences at the fixed time if it has not already commenced by Proclamation: or

(b) a provision that the Act shall be taken to be repealed at the fixed time if the Proclamation has not been made by that time.

4. Preferably, if a period after Royal Assent is chosen, it should not be longer than 6 months. If it is longer, Departments should explain the reason for this in the Explanatory Memorandum. On the other hand, if the date option is chosen, [the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet] do not wish at this stage to restrict the discretion of the instructing Department to choose the date.

5. It is to be noted that if the 'repeal' option is followed, there is no limit on the time from Royal Assent to commencement, as long as the Proclamation is made by the fixed time.

6. Clauses providing for commencement by Proclamation, but without the restrictions mentioned above, should be used only in unusual circumstances, where the commencement depends on an event whose timing is uncertain (eg enactment of complementary State legislation).

The committee notes that paragraph 5 of the explanatory memorandum points out the unusual circumstances where uncertainty of the timing of an event would make paragraph 6 of the Drafting Instruction applicable. The explanatory memorandum states:

The main purpose of the amendments contained in Schedule 2 is to replace the current security arrangements applying to the authorisation and conduct of business of Lloyd's underwriters in Australia with new arrangements which will accommodate Lloyd's new trading structure and substantially improve the protection available to Lloyd's underwriters' Australian policyholders. If Schedule 2 were subject to commencement by default, and for some reason Lloyd's had not met the requirements of the new arrangements within the given time frame, this would lead to the untenable situation where the existing security arrangements would fall away with no substitute in place. While the Commissioner could immediately revoke authorisation for Lloyd's underwriters in Australia, this would only have the effect of not allowing Lloyd's underwriters to write new business in Australia. Existing liabilities would have no financial backing. Accordingly, it is extremely important that the commencement provision not permit the cessation of the current security until there is at least a simultaneous commencement of the new security.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this subclause.

Power of entry and search without warrant
Item 5 of Schedule 2 - proposed subsection 80(1)

Proposed subsection 80(1), to be inserted in the Insurance Act 1973 by item 5 of Schedule 2 to this bill provides:

Entry on premises

(1) If the Commissioner or the inspector, while investigating the whole or a part of the affairs of a designated security trust fund, believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary for the purposes of the investigation to enter land or premises occupied by:

(a) the trustee, or a former trustee, of the fund; or

(b) the custodian, or a former custodian, of the fund; or

(c) the investment manager, or a former investment manager, of the fund;

the Commissioner or the inspector may, at all reasonable times, enter the land or premises and may:

(d) examine books on the land or premises that relate to the affairs of the trust fund or that the Commissioner or inspector believes on reasonable grounds relate to those affairs; and

(e) take possession of any of those books for such period as the Commissioner or inspector thinks necessary for the purposes of the investigation; and

(f) make copies of, or take extracts from, any of those books.

This power of entry and search is not subject to any requirement that the officer obtain a judicially sanctioned search warrant before entering the premises.

The committee recognises that, in this respect, subclause 31(1) does not differ from similar provisions in taxation laws. For example, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 contains a provision (section 263) of similar effect. Another example occurs in the Superannuation Contributions Tax (Assessment and Collection) Act 1997.

There would appear, however, to be no basis in principle for giving officers enforcing insurance laws greater powers than officers enforcing criminal law where a judicially sanctioned warrant is generally required. The committee is also interested to receive advice on what might constitute “reasonable grounds” for exercising the power of entry.

Accordingly, the committee seeks the advice of the Treasurer on this issue.

Pending the advice of the Treasurer, the committee draws Senators' attention to the provision, as it may be considered to trespass unduly on personal rights and liberties, in breach of principle 1(a)(i) of the committee's terms of reference.

Abrogation of the right against self-incrimination
Item 5 of Schedule 2 - proposed subsections 82(3) and (4)

Proposed Division 4, to be inserted in the Insurance Act 1973 by item 5 of Schedule 2 to this bill, deals with investigations by the Commissioner. Proposed subsections 82(3) and (4) deal with the requirement for persons being examined by the Commissioner or the inspector to answer questions. The person is not excused from doing so on the grounds that it may incriminate him or her.

To protect the person under examination, however, proposed subsection 82(4), would make inadmissible in evidence against the person, in any criminal proceedings, any information or thing (including a document) obtained as a direct or indirect result of answering a question. This inadmissibility is subject to an exception with respect to a proceeding for an offence against proposed subsection 82(2). That provision makes it an offence intentionally or recklessly to give information or evidence that is false or misleading. The committee is concerned about all such exceptions, but is prepared to accept the position in these circumstances.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this provision.

Law Officers Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Attorney-General. [Portfolio responsibility: Attorney-General]

The bill proposes to amend the Law Officers Act 1964 to:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Managed Investments Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet) to the Prime Minister. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to amend the Corporations Law to implement a new regime for the regulation of managed investment schemes. Each managed investment scheme is to be operated by a single responsible entity; most of the schemes must be licensed by the Australian Securities Commission and submit compliance plans to the ASC; and will be required to hold a securities dealer's licence.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

NRS Levy Imposition Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister representing the Minister for Communications, the Information Economy and the Arts. [Portfolio responsibility: Communications, the Information Economy and the Arts]

The bill proposes to impose a levy on participating carriers to provide funding for the National Relay Service (NRS). It is intended that the NRS will be provided by a person, who may or may not be a carrier, under a contract with the Commonwealth and that the cost of the NRS will be met by carriers depending on their eligible revenue or timed traffic.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Primary Industries and Energy Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 3) 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Customs and Consumer Affairs. [Portfolio responsibility: Primary Industries and Energy]

The bill proposes to:

amend the following Acts:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Social Security and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Budget and Other Measures) Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister representing the Minister for Social Security. [Portfolio responsibility: Social Security]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Superannuation Legislation (Commonwealth Employment) Repeal and Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Finance and Administration. [Portfolio responsibility: Finance and Administration]

The bill proposes to change superannuation arrangements for Commonwealth employees by amending the following Acts:

The bill also proposes to repeal the Superannuation Act 1922, Superannuation Act 1976, Superannuation Act 1990, Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988 and the superannuation and retirement income provisions of the Papua New Guinea (Staffing Assistance) Act 1973. However, in most circumstances, the repealed legislation will continue to operate through the application of the Superannuation Legislation (Commonwealth Employment–Savings and Transitional Provisions) Act 1997.

Delegated legislation with retrospective effect
Item 14 of Schedule 1 - proposed subsection 3(1A)

Proposed subsection 3(1A), to be inserted in the Superannuation Act 1976 by item 14 of Schedule 1 to this bill, would allow delegated legislation to be made which might have retrospective effect. Subsection 48(2) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, however, ensures that such measures are of no effect if they would prejudicially affect any person other than the Commonwealth. Hence, any retrospectivity would not trespass unduly on personal rights and liberties.

The committee appreciates the intention of the legislation but is concerned that the bill allows delegated legislation to be made which may have retrospective and prejudicial effect, notwithstanding the safeguards provided by the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The committee notes, however, that the role of the Senate Regulations and Ordinances Committee is to scrutinise delegated legislation and to pursue any possible instances of undue trespass on personal rights and liberties in delegated legislation and therefore draws this item to the attention of that committee.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this provision.

Superannuation Legislation (Commonwealth Employment—Saving and Transitional Provisions) Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister for Finance and Administration. [Portfolio responsibility: Finance and Administration]

The bill proposes to make savings and transitional provisions arising out of amendments to, and subsequent repeals of, five Acts by the Superannuation Legislation (Commonwealth Employment) Repeal and Amendment Bill 1997 and the Commonwealth Superannuation Board Bill 1997.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (No. 7) 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 4 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet) to the Prime Minister. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

Retrospectivity
Items 9 and 26 of Schedule 8

Items 9 and 26 of Schedule 8 would provide that the amendments proposed by Schedule 8 will apply from 7.30pm on Budget night, 13 May 1997, and therefore prior to Royal Assent. The committee notes that the amendments give effect to a budget announcement.

The committee has previously indicated that, in relation to retrospectivity, budget measures are something of a special case. In a paper titled The Operation of the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills, 1981-85, the then Chairman of the Committee, Senator Tate, said:

It is customary ... for budgetary measures to be made retrospective to the date of their announcement on Budget night and for changes to taxes, levies, fees to be given effect from the date of their introduction into Parliament.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on these provisions.

Taxation Laws (Technical Amendments) Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 4 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet) to the Prime Minister. [Portfolio responsibility: Treasury]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

Retrospectivity
Subclauses 2(5) to (7) and (11) to (16)

Subclauses 2(5) to (7) and (11) to (16) of this bill, if enacted, would provide for some of the amendments proposed by this bill to commence prior to Royal Assent. It seems to the committee, however, that the amendments are of a technical nature only and make no substantive change to the law.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on these subclauses.

Retrospective application
Subitem 27(3) of Schedule 6

Subitem 27(3) of Schedule 6 to this bill, if enacted, would provide for the amendment proposed by item 4 to apply from Budget night 1995.

The committee notes, however, that the explanatory memorandum states, in paragraph 1.82 that the amendment is 'clarificatory only and does not change the meaning of the relevant provision'.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this subclause.

Retrospective application
Subitem 27(5) of Schedule 6

Subitem 27(5) of Schedule 6 to this bill, if enacted, would provide for the amendment proposed by item 7 to apply from 1 July 1988. It appears to the committee, however, that the amendment is beneficial to taxpayers.

In these circumstances, the committee makes no further comment on this subclause.

Telecommunications Amendment Bill (No. 2) 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Minister representing the Minister for Communications, the Information Economy and the Arts. [Portfolio responsibility: Communications, the Information Economy and the Arts]

The bill proposes to deal with the operation and funding of the National Relay Service (NRS) which provides people who are deaf, hearing, or speech impaired, with access to the standard telephone service on terms, and in circumstances, that are comparable to those on which other Australians have access to a standard telephone service.

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 1997 by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Family Services. [Portfolio responsibility: Health and Family Services]

The bill proposes to amend the following Acts:

The committee has no comment on this bill.

Workplace Relations Amendment (Superannuation) Bill 1997

This bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on 4 December 1997 by the Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business. [Portfolio responsibility: Workplace Relations and Small Business]

The bill proposes to amend the Workplace Relations Act 1996 to remove superannuation from the allowable award matters set out in the Act. The effect of the amendment will be that the Australian Industrial Relations Commission will not be permitted to deal with disputes about superannuation by arbitration.

The committee has no comment on this bill.