Introduction
Establishment
1.1
On 11 October 2016, the Senate established the Select Committee on Red
Tape (to be known as the Red Tape Committee) to inquire into and report on the
effect of restrictions and prohibitions on business (red tape) on the economy
and community, by 1 December 2017, with particular reference to:
- the effects on compliance costs (in hours and
money), economic output, employment and government revenue, with particular
attention to industries, such as mining, manufacturing, tourism and
agriculture, and small business;
- any specific areas of red tape that are
particularly burdensome, complex, redundant or duplicated across jurisdictions;
- the impact on health, safety and economic
opportunity, particularly for the low-skilled and disadvantaged;
- the effectiveness of the Abbott, Turnbull and
previous governments' efforts to reduce red tape;
- the adequacy of current institutional
structures (such as Regulation Impact Statements, the Office of Best Practice
Regulation and red tape repeal days) for achieving genuine and permanent
reductions to red tape;
- alternative institutional arrangements to
reduce red tape, including providing subsidies or tax concessions to businesses
to achieve outcomes currently achieved through regulation;
- how different jurisdictions in Australia and
internationally have attempted to reduce red tape; and
- any related matters.[1]
1.2
The Red Tape Committee (committee) decided to conduct its inquiry by
focusing on specific areas, commencing with the effect of red tape on the sale,
supply and taxation of alcohol (the inquiry).
Conduct of the inquiry and acknowledgement
1.3
The committee advertised the inquiry on its website and wrote to a
number of organisations, inviting submissions by 31 January 2017. In response,
the committee received 25 submissions to the inquiry, which are listed in
Appendix 1.
1.4
The committee held a public hearing on 24 February 2017 in Sydney. The witnesses
who appeared before the committee are listed in Appendix 2.
1.5
The committee thanks the individuals and organisations who made submissions
and who gave evidence to assist the committee with its inquiry.
Scope of the report
1.6
Chapter one of this report provides some background information to set
the context for the inquiry. Chapter two then examines thematically some of the
evidence presented to the committee. The committee intends to draw on this
evidence in its final report.
Two systems for the taxation of alcohol
1.7
Australia has two systems for the taxation of alcohol: the excise and
excise equivalent customs system, and the wine equalisation tax (WET) system.
1.8
Excise duty is a form of volumetric taxation that is levied on alcohol manufactured
or produced in Australia (excluding wine).[2]
It is a commodity‑based tax where liability for payment arises at the
point of manufacture/production. There are different rates of excise duty,
which are indexed biannually according to the Consumer Price Index.[3]
Excisable alcohol goods include beer, spirits and brandy.[4]
1.9
Excise equivalent customs duty is also a commodity‑based tax that
applies to imported alcohol (except from countries exempted under free trade
agreements) at a rate equivalent to the excise rate that would have applied had
the imported alcohol been manufactured or produced domestically.[5]
1.10
In contrast, WET is an ad valorem or value-based tax that applies to domestic
and imported wine. 'Wine' is defined as grape wine, grape wine products, fruit or
vegetable wine, cider or perry, mead and sake. The rate of WET is 29 per cent
of the wholesale sale price of wine.[6]
1.11
According to the Australian Taxation Office, alcohol excise and excise
equivalent customs duty generated $5.4 billion in revenue in 2015–16, and the
WET generated $883 million for the same financial year (totalling approximately
$6.2 billion).[7]
Sale and supply of alcohol
1.12
In each state and territory, legislation and associated regulations
establish a licensing regime for the sale and supply of alcohol. These eight
regimes provide for multiple licences/permits with varying conditions, fees, trading
hours, et cetera.
Table 1.1: A snapshot of Australia's liquor licensing regimes, availability
of licence/permit, as at February 2017[8]
|
Legislation |
Number of licence types |
Regulatory body |
WA
|
Liquor Control Act 1988 |
11 + 8 permits |
Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor |
ACT
|
Liquor Act 2010
|
5 + 2 permits |
Office of Regulatory Services |
NSW
|
Liquor Act 2007 |
7 |
Liquor & Gaming NSW |
NT
|
Liquor Act |
3 + 1 permit |
Department of Attorney-General and Justice |
Qld
|
Liquor Act 1992 |
7 + 7 permits |
Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation |
SA
|
Liquor Licensing Act 1997 |
11 |
Consumer and Business Services |
Tasmania
|
Liquor Licensing Act 1990 |
5 + 4 permits |
Liquor and Gaming Branch, Department of Treasury and
Finance |
Victoria
|
Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 |
14 + 2 permit |
Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor
Regulation |
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page