PREFACE
On 20 May 1987 the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 came into
operation. The primary purpose of the Act was to declare legislatively
what had long been understood to be the scope of freedom of speech in
Parliament. The necessity for the declaration derived from unusual judicial
interpretations, by two judges of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,
of the position concerning the use of proceedings in Parliament during
court proceedings. Unlike previous judgments on the question, the two
judgments indicated that words spoken in parliamentary proceedings could
be used against a person in subsequent court proceedings.
While the need to make a corrective declaration provided the impetus
for the passage of the Act, opportunity was also taken to bring into effect
changes to the law partly based on recommendations of the Joint Select
Committee on Parliamentary Privilege, tabled in the Senate and the House
of Representatives in October 1984, which required legislation for their
operation.
In addition, on 25 February 1988 the Senate passed a series of resolutions
relating to parliamentary privilege. These resolutions were intended to
be complementary to the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 and were
also partly based on recommendations in the report of the joint committee.
By the end of 1991, after almost four years of experience of operating
under the Act and the resolutions, the Senate Committee of Privileges
made a general report on its work. The report, which was tabled in the
Senate on 2 December 1991, gave an outline of the general principles
governing the cases which it had considered, paying particular attention
to an innovatory process adopted by the Senate to permit a right of reply
to persons adversely referred to in the Senate.
Another purpose of that report was to place on the public record, in
an easily accessible form, documents governing the operation of privilege
in the Senate, together with a thematic summary of the Committee's reports,
advices and other matters to give guidance to persons who might be affected
by the Senate's contempt jurisdiction. That report also briefly described
the meaning of privilege, immunity and contempt and the basis of the powers
of each House of Parliament under section 49 of the Constitution.
The purpose of the present report is to update the earlier report and
again to give easy access to the core privilege documents of the Senate
and its committees. In addition to the normal hard-copy publication of
the report, therefore, it will be available on the Parliamentary Database
and the Internet.
Since the publication of the 1991 report, the committee has tabled a
further 26 reports, several of which have gone to the heart of the relationship
between the Parliament and the executive, and many of which have raised
new aspects of parliamentary privilege. These too are summarised in this
report. The most satisfactory feature of the committee's work since 1991
has been that it has consolidated and built upon procedures and trends
already identified in its earlier general report.
Finally, the committee has decided to place its work in the context of
the operation of privilege since the formation of the Commonwealth of
Australia in 1901. This aspect of the report illustrates the continuity
of the Senate's approach to privilege since federation, despite the codification
of privilege rules and proceedings and the increasing quantity and complexity
of the cases which the Committee of Privileges has been required to consider.
The report includes as appendices a resume of each committee report and
its outcome, together with a full list of committee members, chairs and
deputy chairs, an index to all committee reports and a brief statistical
summary of the work of the committee.