CHAPTER 2
REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF ACTS AND PROGRAMS
2.1
Standing Order 25(20) does not provide for consideration of reports on
the implementation or operation of acts or programs. The committee is not
therefore required to include them in its report on the examination of annual
reports. However, the committee chose to examine the following reports which
are submitted in accordance with the Migration Act 1958 (Migration Act):
- Report pursuant to Section 91Y of the Migration Act on Protection
Visa Processing Taking More Than 90 days for the period 1 July to 31 October
2009 (published by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC));
- Report Pursuant to Section 440A of the Migration Act on the
conduct of Refugee Review Tribunal reviews not completed within 90 days for the
period 1 July to 31 October 2009 (published by the Refugee Review Tribunal
(RRT)).
Protection visa processing taking more than 90 days and refugee reviews
taking more than 90 days
2.2
Section 65A of the Migration Act imposes a requirement for the Minister
to make a decision on a protection visa application within 90 days of the
lodgement of the application. If this target is exceeded, the Secretary of DIAC
is required, under section 91Y of the Migration Act, to report on protection
visa applications for which decision making has taken over 90 days. Similarly,
section 440A requires the RRT to report on reviews not completed within 90
days.
2.3
DIAC and the RRT are required to report every four months, with the
latest reports reviewed by the committee covering the period 1 July 2009 to
31 October 2009.
2.4
The committee monitors these periodic reports to the Minister, which are
tabled in the Parliament, and considers the timeliness of both decisions on
protection visa applications and RRT reviews as, not only beneficial to the
applicant, but also a demonstration of the agencies' commitment to improving efficiency.
These reports ensure that the processes within the department and tribunal are
open and accountable.
Protection visa processing taking more
than 90 days
2.5
The table below compares protection visa processing by DIAC taking more
than 90 days for the three previous reporting periods:
|
1 November 2008 to 28
February 2009 |
1 March 2009 to 30 June
2009 |
1 July 2009 to 31
October 2009 |
Total number undecided
outside of 90 day period |
324 |
480 |
524 |
Total number decided
outside of 90 day period |
409 |
488 |
582 |
Total number processed
outside of 90 day period |
733 |
968 |
1106 |
Percentage of total
applications processed outside of 90 day period |
21% |
25% |
25% |
2.6
The committee was pleased to note that the number of delays attributable
to departmental processing delays has fallen since the previous report. The
current report identified 308 delays in this category compared to 342 in the
previous report.[1]
2.7
The report advised that most of the applications not decided within 90
days due to factors within DIAC's control had sound reasons for deferral. For
example, they included:
...applications requiring DIAC exploration of complex character
issues which might warrant visa refusal, and application where it is prudent to
await the outcome of serious criminal charges.[2]
2.8
The committee will continue to monitor these reports and hopes to see a
decrease in delays and a larger percentage of applications processed within the
90 day processing timeframe.
Refugee Review Tribunal reviews not
completed within 90 days
2.9
This table outlines the number of RRT reviews not completed within 90
days for the previous three reporting periods:
|
1 November 2008 – 28
February 2009 |
1 March 2009 to 30 June
2009 |
1 July 2009 to 31 October 2009 |
Reviews completed outside of 90 days |
197 (25%) |
287 (31%) |
247 (36%) |
Reviews completed within 90 days |
601 (75%) |
634 (69%) |
448 (64%) |
Total |
798 |
921 |
695 |
2.10
The committee notes the increasing percentage of reviews being completed
outside of 90 days. The committee further notes that the reasons for reviews
not being completed within the 90-day timeframe can include factors outside the
RRT's control (such as matters relating to the applicant or the legal adviser
or matters which relate to third parties).[3]
Senator Trish
Crossin
Committee Chair
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page