Chapter 1
Introduction
Referral
1.1
On 3 December 2015 the Hon Michael Keenan MP, Minister for Justice and
Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Counter-Terrorism, introduced the Australian
Crime Commission Amendment (National Policing Information) Bill 2015 (the
merger bill) and the Australian Crime Commission (National Policing Information
Charges) Bill 2015 (the charges bill) into the House of Representatives.[1]
1.2
On 4 February 2016, pursuant to a report of the Senate Standing
Committee for Selection of Bills, the Senate referred the provisions of the two
bills to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee (the
committee) for inquiry and report by 10 March 2016.[2]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.3
In accordance with usual practice the committee wrote to a number of
persons and organisations, inviting submissions to the inquiry by 18 February 2016.
Details of the inquiry were also made available through the committee's website
at https://www.aph.gov.au/senate_legalcon.
1.4
The committee received five submissions in response to this inquiry. The
submissions are listed at Appendix 1 to this report and are available on the
committee's webpage. The committee would like to thank all those who submitted
to the inquiry.
Background to the bills
1.5
CrimTrac was established in 2000, pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement
(IGA) between the Commonwealth and state and territory governments, to enhance
Australian law enforcement with an emphasis on information-based policing
facilitated through rapid access to detailed, current and accurate police
information.[3]
The services currently provided by CrimTrac include:
-
the National Police Checking Service (NPCS) (criminal history
checking);
-
the National Child Offender System (comprising the Australian
National Child Offender Register and the Managed Person System);
-
the National Police Reference System; and
-
the National Firearms Identification Database.[4]
1.6
The NPCS is used for the purposes of employment (including volunteer)
screening to provide a complete national view of a person's previous
convictions for criminal offences. NPCS is provided to the Australian police
services and to certain accredited Commonwealth, state and territory government
agencies and commercial bodies. The service is not currently provided directly
to members of the public.[5]
1.7
CrimTrac handles a wide range of information received from police and
other sources, including personal and sensitive information such as
individuals' criminal records, DNA profiles of offenders, details about missing
persons, and fingerprint and palm images.[6]
1.8
In accordance with the IGA, CrimTrac is an executive agency within the
Attorney-General's portfolio. It is headed by a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
a Board of Management comprising the Police Commissioner from each state and
the NT, the Chief Police Officer of the ACT, the Commissioner of the Australian
Federal Police (AFP), and a nominated representative of the Attorney-General's
Department (the department).[7]
1.9
The Australian Crime Commission (ACC) is Australia's national criminal
intelligence agency with specialist investigative capabilities, including
coercive powers. The ACC's main functions are to:
-
collect, correlate, analyse and share criminal information and
intelligence;
-
maintain a national database of criminal information and
intelligence;
-
undertake intelligence operations;
-
investigate matters relating to federally relevant criminal activity;
-
provide strategic criminal assessments; and
-
provide advice on national criminal intelligence priorities.[8]
1.10
The ACC is a statutory agency within the Attorney-General's portfolio.
ACC is also headed by a CEO and a board, with representatives from Commonwealth,
state and territory law enforcement and key national security and regulatory
agencies.[9]
1.11
In 2014 the National Commission of Audit considered the consolidation of
crime intelligence capabilities. The Commission recommended that, as criminal
law enforcement is increasingly dependent on strong intelligence collection and
analysis, CrimTrac be merged with the ACC to better harness the organisations'
collective resources.[10]
The Commission concluded that while the agencies were working effectively together,
a consolidated crime intelligence capability would better support law
enforcement operations by the AFP and other Commonwealth and state agencies.[11]
1.12
The Commission of Audit report noted that the recommendation to merge
CrimTrac with the ACC would require consultation with the states and that,
'[i]t is critical their interests are reflected, including through the
continued representation of the state police commissioners on the Australian
Crime Commission board'.[12]
1.13
Through the ACC and CrimTrac Boards, the Commonwealth consulted with the
states and territories to develop recommended options to improve collaboration
between the two agencies.[13]
On 5 November 2015 the Law, Crime and Community Safety Council (LCCSC),
comprising the justice ministers of all Australian jurisdictions, agreed to the
Commonwealth taking the necessary steps to merge CrimTrac and the ACC.[14]
Purpose of the bills
1.14
The purpose of the merger bill is to amend the Australian Crime
Commission Act 2002 (ACC Act) in order to merge the CrimTrac agency into
the ACC.[15]
The purpose of the charges bill is to create a legislative basis for the ACC to
be able to impose charges, as taxes, for applications for, and the provision
of, national policing information services currently provided by CrimTrac.[16]
1.15
The bills would bring together Australia's national criminal
intelligence and information capabilities under one banner, providing the ACC
with direct access to CrimTrac's national police information holdings and
sophisticated information capabilities. Together, the bills would allow the
merged agency to continue the self-funded model that has supported CrimTrac's
services at no cost to the budget.[17]
1.16
According to the explanatory memorandum, having a unified resource would
enrich the national understanding of criminal activity, including volume crimes
(such as domestic violence) and serious and organised crime and terrorism. The
merger of the agencies would improve the quality, access and timeliness of
intelligence provided to law enforcement and intelligence agencies and would
allow police, justice agencies and policy makers at all levels of government to
adopt a more effective, efficient and evidence-based response to crime.[18]
Key provisions of the bills
The merger bill
1.17
The merger bill amends the ACC Act to enable the merged agency to carry
out all of CrimTrac's functions. These are referred to as 'national policing
information' functions under the merged agency structure.[19]
Under Item 1 of Schedule 1 in the merger bill, national policing information is
defined as information that is collected by the AFP, the police force of a state
or territory, or a body prescribed by the regulations.[20]
1.18
National policing information does not include any further information,
opinion, interpretation or conclusions derived by the ACC from collected
information, or any collected information included in an analysis, report or
other presentation by the ACC.[21]
The definition would ensure that information collected by the ACC through its
existing investigatory and intelligence functions is separate and distinct from
national policing information of the type currently dealt with by CrimTrac.[22]
1.19
Item 3 of schedule 1 would insert a new paragraph (fa) into section 7A
of the ACC Act to enable the ACC to perform all of the functions currently
carried out by CrimTrac.[23]
The ACC would exercise the following functions:
(fa) to
provide systems and services relating to national policing information,
including the following:
(i) collecting,
correlating and organising national policing information;
(ii) providing access to
national policing information;
(iii) supporting
and facilitating the exchange of national policing information;
(iv) providing
nationally coordinated criminal history checks on payment of a charge imposed
by the Charges Act.[24]
1.20
The merger bill would result in the CrimTrac Board of Management and the
position of CrimTrac CEO being abolished, and a single board overseeing the
merged agency, which would fall to the ACC Board under the ACC Act.[25]
1.21
All agencies represented on the current CrimTrac Board are represented
on the ACC Board, along with heads of other Commonwealth agencies including the
Australian Border Force, Australian Securities and Investments Commission,
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, Australian Taxation Office, and
AUSTRAC.[26]
The bill proposes to increase the quorum requirement for the ACC Board from
seven to nine of its fourteen (voting) members, to ensure that police retain
influence over decisions relating to national policing information functions.[27]
1.22
The amendments to the ACC Act would provide the ACC Board with
additional, specific functions currently exercised by the CrimTrac Board.[28]
This would include making recommendations to the minister about expenditure
from the National Policing Information Systems and Services Special Account. The
Special Account's primary purpose is to support the development and maintenance
of new and existing information sharing systems for Australia's police
services.[29]
1.23
The revenue that CrimTrac currently generates accrues into the Special
Account. This allows the revenue generated by CrimTrac to be kept separate from
other Commonwealth funds and invested in national policing information
services. The merger bill would continue the Special Account, set out the funds
that must be credited to the account, and the purposes for which the account
may be debited.[30]
1.24
Sections 59AA-59AD of the ACC Act govern the ACC's disclosure of
information to government and private sector organisations, and the purposes
for which information may be shared and with whom. Items 29, 30 and 31 of
Schedule 1 of the merger bill would amend the disclosure regime under the ACC
Act to take into account the ACC's new national policing information functions.
The amendments would distinguish between disclosure of national policing
information and other information held by the ACC.[31]
1.25
Currently, the CrimTrac CEO, within parameters set by the CrimTrac Board,
is responsible for determining which organisations can access criminal history
checks through CrimTrac.[32]
Item 17 of Schedule 1 of the merger bill would provide the ACC CEO with the
function of approving bodies that may access nationally coordinated criminal
history checks through the ACC. The CEO would be able to approve, in writing, a
body of the Commonwealth, a state or territory, or any other body or
organisation however described (including organisations outside Australia) as
an accredited body for the purposes of receiving nationally coordinated
criminal history checks.[33]
In deciding whether to approve a body or organisation, the CEO must act in
accordance with any policy determined, or any direction given, by the ACC
Board.[34]
1.26
The bill would then allow the ACC CEO to disclose nationally coordinated
criminal history checks to an accredited body, or to the person to whom the
check relates, if disclosing the information would not be contrary to a
Commonwealth, state or territory law that would otherwise apply, and if it was
not contrary to any relevant conditions determined by the board. This would
enable the ACC Board to set limits or conditions on the level of access an
accredited body could have to criminal history checks, mirroring the current
involvement of the CrimTrac Board in these types of decisions.[35]
1.27
In relation to the onward disclosure of national policing information to
another government body, new subsection 59AA(1B) would provide that the ACC CEO
must obtain the ACC's Board's approval before disclosing national policing
information to an agency that is not one of the following:
- the Australian Federal Police
- a Police Force of a State
- the Department
administered by the Minister who administers the Australian Border Force Act
2015
- the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
- the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation
- the Australian Taxation Office, or
- a body prescribed by the regulations.
1.28
The bill further provides that the ACC CEO must act in accordance with
any policy determined, and any directions given, in writing by the Board. This
would allow the ACC Board to set limits or conditions on the level of access a
government agency may have to national policing information, as the CrimTrac
Board currently does.[36]
1.29
Schedule 2 of the merger bill amends the Crimes Act 1947, the Law
Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 and the Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy
Act) to make consequential amendments, and makes transitional arrangements.[37]
The charges bill
1.30
The charges bill contains provisions to allow the ACC Act to provide
national policing information services according to the same federal funding
model that currently applies to CrimTrac: a self-funded federal scheme
established under an IGA with the states and territories.[38]
The charges bill would enable the merged agency to impose charges for certain services
in order to fund or subsidise the provision of other services to police and the
community, and also to charge fees on a cost recovery basis for discrete
services.[39]
The bill aims to allow the business model to adapt to meet emerging information
technology needs of police as national policing information services evolve.[40]
1.31
The charges bill would allow the minister to specify in a legislative
instrument the services that the merged agency would charge for, who has to pay
the charges and the amount of each charge.[41]
Human rights implications
1.32
The merger bill engages the right to freedom from unlawful or arbitrary
interferences with a person's privacy under Article 17 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), because the national policing
information covered by the new and amended disclosure provisions in the bill
could include personal information.[42]
1.33
The explanatory memorandum for the merger bill noted that the new regime
for the disclosure of nationally coordinated history checks would enable the
continuation of CrimTrac's current business model, with criminal history checks
only disclosed to an accredited agency on behalf of an individual.[43]
Should the business model evolve, the merger bill would ensure an individual's
right to privacy would remain protected with the merged agency able to provide
a criminal history check directly to an individual who is the subject of the
check. Information could only be disclosed where a disclosure was not contrary
to a Commonwealth, state or territory law.[44]
1.34
In relation to disclosure to other government agencies, the regime would
ensure that the ACC may only disclose national policing information in similar
circumstances to those currently accepted by CrimTrac. In requiring that the
ACC CEO obtain the approval of the ACC Board for disclosure to a non-law
enforcement agency, the amendments would impose additional requirements to the
strict regime that already applies to other ACC information.[45]
1.35
The explanatory memorandum stated that in these circumstances the bill
created permissible limitations on the right to privacy which were reasonable,
necessary and proportionate, and therefore compatible with human rights and
freedoms under Australian law.[46]
1.36
The department, the ACC and CrimTrac prepared a Privacy Impact
Assessment (PIA) to assess the impact the merger would have on the protection
of personal information, and provided the PIA to the committee.[47]
The PIA assessed that, while merging CrimTrac into the ACC would mean that it
would no longer be subject to the Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act), this
would not diminish the protection of the personal information currently held by
CrimTrac. This issue is discussed further in chapter two.
1.37
According to the charges bill explanatory memorandum, that bill does not
raise any human rights issues.[48]
Consideration by other committees
1.38
The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills sought advice
from the minister in regard to:
-
whether the legislation could contain more guidance in relation
to the types of bodies that may access nationally coordinated criminal history
checks. The committee regarded the amendments as very broad with the CEO able
to approve the accreditation of a body of the Commonwealth, a state or a
territory, including organisations outside Australia; and
-
whether policy and directions issued by the ACC Board regarding
accreditation should be subject to Parliamentary oversight and disallowance.[49]
1.39
Further, in regard to amendments allowing the ACC Board to set limits or
conditions on the level of access an accredited body or an individual could
have to nationally coordinated criminal history checks, the Scrutiny of Bills
Committee:
seeks the Minister's advice as to whether guidance concerning
the setting of such limits and conditions could be contained in the primary
legislation and, if not, whether it is appropriate for the setting of such
limits and controls to at least be subject to disallowance.[50]
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page