Appendix II
Treasurer's
Press Release No. 17, 9 April 1999 and Intergovernmental Agreement on the Reform
of Commonwealth-State Financial RelationsEMBARGO: 9 April 1999
PREMIERS' CONFERENCE/LOAN COUNCIL OUTCOME FOR 1999-2000 In
reaching agreement today on general revenue assistance to the States and Territories
in 1999-2000, the Premiers' Conference recognised that the continuation of sound
fiscal policies by all levels of government remains fundamental to maintaining
economic and employment growth in an uncertain international environment. The
substantial programme of fiscal consolidation implemented by the Federal Government
during its first term has played a central role in boosting international investor
confidence in Australia and creating the conditions for strong and sustainable
economic growth, notwithstanding the sharp downturn in the Asian region. Despite
the need for ongoing fiscal restraint, the agreement reached today sees a substantial
increase in Commonwealth payments to the States and Territories in 1999-2000.
· General revenue assistance to the States and Territories is expected
to increase by $843 million (4.9 per cent) in 1999-2000. Allowing
for the fact that States and Territories will no longer be making State fiscal
contributions, which totalled $313.4 million in 1998-99, general revenue
assistance will rise by 6.9 per cent in 1999-2000, or 4.4 per cent
in real terms. · Total payments to the States - which include general
revenue assistance and specific purpose payments - are estimated to rise by $988 million
or 3.0 per cent. General Revenue Assistance The
Commonwealth will maintain Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) to the States and
Territories in real per capita terms in 1999-2000, resulting in an estimated increase
in total FAGs of some $628 million, or 3.7 per cent. The
distribution of FAGs between the States and Territories will be based on the corrected
Commonwealth Grants Commission's (CGC) 1999 recommended per capita relativities,
using a five year assessment period and including an allowance for depreciation
costs of the States. A State or Territory's receipt of the per capita element
of FAGs growth will remain conditional on meeting the obligations of the Agreement
to Implement the National Competition Policy and Related Reforms. The
Commonwealth will also provide Competition Payments to the States and Territories
as specified in the Agreement to Implement the National Competition Policy
and Related Reforms. These payments will be worth up to $443.3 million
in 1999-2000, more than double their estimated 1998-99 level of $216.2 million.
A State's receipt of its per capita share of Competition Payments will be determined
once the National Competition Council has released its assessment of progress
under the Agreement. The ACT will receive Special Revenue Assistance from
the Commonwealth totalling $13.2 million in 1999-2000, comprising transitional
allowances of $9.3 million and $3.9 million for special fiscal needs. These
amounts are in accordance with the CGC's recommendations and will be funded directly
by the Commonwealth. Details of the estimated general revenue assistance
to the States and Territories in 1998-99 and 1999-2000 are set out in Tables 1
and 2. The actual 1999-2000 payments for FAGs and Competition Payments
will reflect the outcome for the CPI and the determination of population by the
Australian Statistician during the year. Total PaymentsTable 3
shows estimated total payments, comprising general revenue assistance and specific
purpose payments, to the States and Territories in 1999-2000. The estimates of
specific purpose payments are cash based estimates as at the time of the Commonwealth's
Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook and are prepared on a no policy change basis.
In accordance with normal budgetary procedures, specific purpose payments will
be subject to consideration in the Commonwealth's 1999-2000 Budget processes.
Detailed estimates of the proposed level and distribution of specific purpose
payments will be included in the 1999-2000 Budget papers. 1999-2000 will
be the final year in which FAGs payments are made to the States and Territories.
From 2000-01, States and Territories will receive the full proceeds of the GST.
This historic reform to Commonwealth-State financial relations will provide States
and Territories with a more robust tax base which can be expected to grow over
time, while at the same time permitting the elimination of a range of existing
inefficient taxes which are impeding economic activity. Over time, these
new arrangements will substantially improve the overall financial position of
all States and Territories, while in the transitional period, the Commonwealth
has undertaken to ensure that the budgetary position of each State and Territory
is no worse off than it would have been had the reforms not been made. Loan
Council Allocations for 1999-2000 Loan Council endorsed the Loan Council
Allocations (LCAs) nominated by the Commonwealth and each State and Territory
for 1999-2000. These are shown in Table 4. Loan Council noted that the
Australian economy has remained resilient in the face of the international slowdown
and, in particular, the downturn in many of our Asian trading partners. Loan Council
considered that the process of fiscal consolidation has been important in helping
to shield the domestic economy from the instability experienced in our region
and noted the need for continued perseverance with sound fiscal policies. Against
this background, Loan Council considered that the aggregate of LCA nominations
is consistent with current macroeconomic policy objectives. TABLE 1:
GENERAL REVENUE ASSISTANCE TO THE STATES AND TERRITORIES, 1998-99 & 1999-2000
(a) The estimates of financial
assistance grants (FAGs) are determined by distributing the pool of FAGs and unquarantined
health care grants on the basis of the per capita relativities recommended by
the Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC), and then deducting the estimate of unquarantined
health care grants. The FAGs estimates do not include offsets for State fiscal
contributions in 1998-99. FAGs for 1999-2000 have been derived by indexing
estimated FAGs for 1998-99 by 3.74 per cent (an increase of $627.7 million).
The final outcome for 1999-2000 will depend on the actual increase in the CPI
to March 2000 and the determination of the Statistician as to population
as at 31 December 1998 and 31 December 1999, as well as the
final level of FAGs for 1998-99. (b) For 1998-99 and 1999-2000, these payments
only consist of transitional allowances and special fiscal needs paid to the ACT
in accordance with CGC recommendations. (c) The Agreement to Implement
the National Competition Policy and Related Reforms specifies that $200 million
in 1994-95 prices is to be distributed between the States on an equal per capita
basis in 1998-99 and $400 million in 1994-95 prices in 1999-2000. The receipt
of the payment is conditional on a State meeting the obligations of the Agreement.
Note: All numbers in this table have been rounded. Any discrepancies in
the totals are due to rounding. TABLE 2: DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
GRANTS (FAGS) TO THE STATES AND TERRITORIES, 1999-2000
(a) Total weighted population differs from the total population in column
1 as the per capita relativities are calculated by the CGC using population numbers
for a lagged assessment period and are then rounded. It is the total population
shown in column 1 that is used in determining an index factor for the FAGs pool.
Note also that the population numbers are projections. (b) As specified
under the AHCAs. Note: All numbers in this table have been rounded. Any
discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding. TABLE 3: ESTIMATED
TOTAL PAYMENTS TO THE STATES AND TERRITORIES, 1998-99 & 1999-2000 (a)
(a) Specific purpose payment data are
presented on a cash basis in this table and abstract from grants to the States
under the Guns Buyback Scheme ($78.8 million in 1998-99). Note:
All numbers in this table have been rounded. Any discrepancies in the totals are
due to rounding. TABLE 4: LOAN COUNCIL ALLOCATIONS 1999-2000
NOMINATIONS ($m) (a) Figures
have been rounded. Discrepancies between totals and sums of components reflect
rounding. (a) LCA nominations for 1999-2000 reflect current best estimates
of 1999-2000 public sector deficits/surpluses. Nominations have been provided
on the basis of policies announced up to and included in jurisdictions' mid year
reports. With the exception of Victoria (see footnote 2) nominations are based
on preliminary estimates of general government finances provided by jurisdictions
for purposes of their mid year reports, and projected bottom lines for each jurisdiction's
PTE sector. Updated LCA estimates will be provided through publication by each
jurisdiction of its budget time LCA as part of its budget documentation. The 2 per
cent (of total non-financial public sector revenue) tolerance limits around each
jurisdiction's 1999-2000 LCA are designed, inter alia, to accommodate changes
to the LCA resulting from changes in policy. - Memorandum items are
used to adjust the public sector deficit/surplus to include in LCAs certain transactions
- such as operating leases - that have many of the characteristics of public sector
borrowings but do not constitute formal borrowings. They are also used, where
appropriate, to deduct from the public sector deficit/surplus certain transactions
that Loan Council has agreed should not be included in LCAs - for example, the
funding of more than employers' emerging costs under public sector superannuation
schemes, or borrowings by entities such as statutory marketing authorities. Where
relevant, memorandum items include an amount for gross new borrowings of government
home finance schemes. Overfunding and underfunding of emerging superannuation
liabilities is also included as a memorandum item, as are interest earnings on
employer superannuation balances.
- Government contingent exposures under
infrastructure projects with private sector involvement are identified in the
attachment to this report, rather than included as a component of LCAs. These
exposures, which are measured as the government's contractual liabilities in the
event of termination of the project, are unlikely to be realised and are thus
materially different from actual borrowings undertaken to finance the public sector
deficit. Government outlays under these projects, such as equity contributions
and ongoing commercial payments to the private sector, continue to be included
in the annual total public sector deficit, and hence the LCA.
- New South
Wales' 1999-2000 allocations and latest 1998-99 estimates incorporate the impact
of its superannuation conversion offer.
- Victoria updated its 1999-2000
LCA nomination, and its latest estimate of 1998-99 LCA, on 7 April 1999. These
changes were mainly due to significant privatisation receipts, which occurred
after their Mid Year Report.
3. Changes in the measurement of overfunding
of superannuation have led to a substantial upward revision in South Australia's
memorandum items and in the LCA surplus estimated for 1998-99. 4. The revision
in the Commonwealth's 1998-99 estimate since Budget time mainly reflects a change
in the timing of the sale of the Government's remaining equity in Telstra.
Top
|