Chapter 1
Introduction
Referral to the Committee
1.1
On 16 June 2008, the Senate referred the Renewable Energy (Electricity)
Amendment (Feed-in-Tariff) Bill 2008 (hereafter 'the bill') to the Senate
Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 14 October 2008. On 25 September 2008 the Senate granted an extension of time to report
until 10 November 2008.
1.2
The committee advertised the inquiry in the Australian newspaper.
Details of the inquiry were placed on the committee's website and the committee
also wrote to a number of organisations and stakeholder groups inviting written
submissions by 15 August 2008.
1.3
The committee received submissions from 129 individuals and
organisations, as listed at Appendix 1. The committee also held public hearings
in Sydney on Monday 8 September, in Melbourne on Tuesday 9 September and in Canberra
on Thursday, 16 October 2008. A list of those who gave evidence at this hearing
is at Appendix 2. The broad majority of submissions were supportive of feed-in
tariffs, as discussed in chapter 3. The committee thanks all those who assisted
with its inquiry.
What is a Feed-in Tariff?
1.4
Most electricity is generated by a small number of large power stations.
Their energy is distributed, through the electricity grid, to many consumers.
However, it is possible for electricity to be produced by small dispersed generating
units, which are often based on renewable energy technologies such as wind or
photovoltaic cells.
1.5
A feed-in tariff (FIT) is a policy mechanism used to encourage the use of
both small dispersed generating capacity and large 'utility-scale' generators.
A FIT is a rate, usually set by a regulator or government, which electricity
retailers or a regulator are required to pay to particular electricity generators
who want to feed power into the electricity grid. A FIT will:
put a legal obligation on utility companies to buy electricity
from renewable energy producers at a premium rate, usually over a guaranteed
period, making the installation of renewable energy systems a worthwhile and
secure investment for the producer. The extra cost is shared among all energy
users, thereby reducing it to a barely noticeable level.[1]
1.6
There are at least two main reasons why a FIT may be set.[2]
It may be intended to correct a market failure, such as a lack of a price
signal reflecting the environmental harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions. It
may also be used to stimulate the development of particular electricity
generating technologies, such as photovoltaic cells. Often these two reasons
are closely related, and the objectives of a FIT are discussed further in
chapter 2.
The bill
1.7
The bill seeks to amend the Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000
(hereafter 'the Act') to establish a national FIT law. The object of the bill is
to support the greater commercialisation of renewable energy technologies by:
(a) providing specifically tailored support for a range of
renewable energy technologies that are currently not adequately assisted by the
mandatory renewable energy target;
(b) requiring electricity retailers to permit owners of
qualifying generators to supply the electricity grid with electricity generated
from selected renewable energy sources;
(c) providing a payment to owners of qualifying generators
for the renewable electricity which they produce from renewable energy sources
installed after the commencement of this Act;
(d) establishing an effective monitoring regime to monitor
the extent of production of renewable electricity by owners of qualifying
generators.[3]
Issues to be considered
1.8
FITs are complex policy instruments that are challenging to successfully
design and implement.[4]
The many issues that must be carefully addressed include:
- Whether to adopt gross or net metering as the basis for paying a
premium tariff;
- Whether existing renewable energy generators should be eligible
for the new tariff;
- What renewable energy sources should qualify, and what premium
tariffs each should receive;
- How and when tariff moneys should be collected and distributed;
- What size of renewable energy generator should be eligible under
the scheme, and whether the tariff should vary according to generating
capacity;
- Who or what pays any costs associated with grid connection or
grid upgrading if it is required;
- How, and by how much, any premium tariff should decrease over
time; and
- For how long a scheme should operate.
1.9
In addition, any national approach to FITs must address the range of
existing state and territory FIT schemes. Any FIT scheme must also be tailored
to interact effectively with other climate change and energy policy
instruments, such as an emissions trading scheme and renewable energy targets.
Existing FITs
1.10
There are FIT schemes already operating in some Australian states and
territories. The committee notes that FIT policies are under discussion by the
Council of Australian Governments (COAG). At its meeting of March 2008, COAG
agreed 'to consider options for a harmonised approach to renewable energy feed
in tariffs in October 2008'.[5]
The committee understands this consideration is ongoing.
1.11
Currently, there is some form of FIT in the Australian Capital Territory,
Queensland, South Australia and Victoria. A FIT has also been piloted in the
Alice Springs Solar Cities program. The schemes vary significantly in their
design.[6]
Some of these FIT schemes are restricted to new installations, others are not.
Some offer a FIT for all electricity generated, others for only the electricity
that is surplus to the users' needs. Some have set limits for the scheme (such
as a target number of megawatts of electricity generation), others have not.
These differences in FIT schemes mean there is no consistent national approach.
All these design choices raise significant policy questions, discussed in the
next two chapters.
1.12
In addition, the existing Australian state and territory schemes have
various eligibility restrictions. In Victoria, the scheme is limited to
installed units of up to two kilowatt hours (kWh) generating capacity, and the
scheme as a whole is capped at 100 megawatts (MW) of generating capacity.[7]
1.13
South Australia also limits the size of customers and systems eligible
to participate. Its eligibility criteria are that the system must:
-
be operated by a small customer (ie a customer who fits in to the
‘small customer’ category, defined as consuming less than 160 mega watt-hours
of electricity per annum)
-
be grid-connected to a distribution network which supplies
electricity to 10,000 or more domestic customers (eg ETSA Utilities)
-
be connected to the grid via a ‘bi-directional’ or
‘import/export’ meter
-
fit the definition of a small (PV generator meaning a PV system
with capacity up to 10kVA [kilovolt amps] for a single phase connection and up
to 30kVA for a three phase connection*
-
comply with Australian Standard—AS 4777.[8]
1.14
Queensland has a scheme similar to that in South Australia. The
conditions of eligibility in Queensland are that customers must:
-
consume no more than 100 megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity a
year (the average household uses 10 MWh a year)
-
purchase and install a new solar power (photovoltaic) system (not
solar hot water system) or operate an existing system that is connected to the Queensland
electricity grid
-
generate surplus electricity that is fed into the Queensland
electricity grid
-
have an agreement in place with their electricity distributor
(Ergon Energy or Energex) and have appropriate metering installed
-
have solar PV systems with a capacity of up to 10kVA for single
phase power and 30kVA for three-phase power
-
hold an electricity account with an electricity retailer.[9]
1.15
Customers must also meet the costs of installation of new electricity
meters. The Queensland scheme is subject to review once a level of 8MW of
capacity is installed state-wide.[10]
1.16
The Australian Capital Territory's scheme in contrast has very few
eligibility limits. While large generators receive a less generous feed-in
tariff than household-sized installations, there is no size limit on individual
generators (unlike Queensland, Victoria and South Australia) and no upper limit
on the number of participants or number of MW that can be eligible for the
feed-in tariff (in contrast to limits or reviews in Victoria and Queensland).[11]
1.17
The table below summarises some key features of current Australian FIT
schemes.
Location |
Size
limits to individual installations |
Limits
or caps to scheme |
Net
or gross |
New
or existing |
Value
of FIT |
Eligible
sources |
South Australia[12] |
<10kVA single phase / <30kVA three phase |
Review at 2.5 years or when 10MW installed |
Net |
Both |
44 c / kWh (minimum) |
PV only |
Victoria[13] |
2kW |
Limit of 100MW |
Net |
Both |
60 c / kWh (approx 4 times retail) |
PV only |
Queensland[14] |
<10kVA single phase / <30kVA three phase |
Review at 8MW installed |
Net |
Both |
44 c / kWh |
PV only |
ACT[15] |
None, but tariff reduces for large installations |
None |
Gross |
Both |
3.88 * retail tariff |
Solar and wind |
Alice Springs Solar Cities[16] |
Not known |
Limit of 225 installations |
Gross |
New only |
45 c / kWh |
PV only |
Policy issues that arise in the design of a FIT scheme are
discussed in the following chapters.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page