Government Senators' report
Government
Senators of the Committee reject the findings of the reports compiled from an
inquiry that is an unprecedented encroachment on the independence of the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation by the Australian Labor Party and the
Australian Democrats. This is more than ironic given their constant claims
that they are staunch defenders of ABC independence.
The ABC Act sets
out the duty of the ABC Board to maintain the independence and integrity of the
Corporation and to ensure that gathering and presentation by the Corporation of
news information, is accurate and impartial. It is the responsibility of the
Board to ensure that arrangements entered into by the ABC conform with its
Charter and policies. What is particularly important is that the Board ensures
that its own statutory obligations are met when it enters into these
arrangements.
There is no
evidence that the ABC or Telstra have erred in terms of the contract that
provides clear benefits for both the ABC and Telstra.
We hold the view
that such decisions are properly a matter for the consideration of the ABC's
management and Board, and have every confidence that they can exercise their
discretion in a way that preserves the ABC's commercial and editorial
interests. This has been the case in broadcasting environments and ABC
products in ABC shops, and, continues to be the case in relation to ABC online
alliances.
There is no
requirement for rolling inquiries into the ABC as there are ample opportunities
through the Parliamentary process, to scrutinise the ABC, including questions
on notice and the estimates process.
We view the
recommendations of the reports by the Australian Democrats and ALP as an
unwelcome interference in the discretion of the ABC Board. We support the
ABC's desire to become a strong player in the emerging online context, to seek
new audiences and to adapt itself to a circumstance in which the lines between
broadcasting, online and other media are becoming increasingly blurred. In
entering into this new commercial relationship, we have every confidence that
the ABC will be able to carefully and expertly manage this transition.
The ABC and the
new online world
The ABC, while
operating in a tight fiscal environment, receives in excess of $600 million in
Federal Government funding. High quality content places the ABC in an
excellent position to take advantage of the current online environment and
future developments as full audio-visual material in online technologies become
more accessible.
Accessibility to
the ABC's Australian online content will allow increased exposure for the ABC
in both Australia and overseas and will promote Australia's cultural identity
in an increasingly globalised environment.
The ABC offered strong
reasons for wanting to sell its online content to other websites and online
portals. According to its Manager of Corporate Strategy and Communications, Dr
Julianne Schultz:
There were two key interests. One was to
ensure that ABC Online content ... was as widely as possible available in as
many platforms as possible, but that that was done within our editorial
control. The Board recognised at the same time that there was a commercial
value in ABC Online content.[1]
As Dr Schultz
suggests, the ABC must develop new strategies to maintain and broaden its reach
in a circumstance where 'there will be increasing audience fragmentation'.[2] In response to the views of
some witnesses that the ABC should not be entering into online commercial
relationships at all, Government Senators emphasise Dr Schultz's persuasive
argument that:
...[if we are stopped from selling our content]
ABC content will become increasingly less visible. You will increasingly find
that there are many other entry points to the online world were people go for
their online shopping - whatever it may be. You would find that the ABC
content would not be visible and not be present and not be present in those
sites. 1 think it would be a disservice to all Australians.[3]
The Government
Senators also support the ABC's legitimate, commercial freedom to position
itself so that it has future access to broadband delivery systems such as
cable. As the former Managing Director of the ABC, Mr Brian Johns, has argued:
The second important feature [of the Telstra
agreement] is that it centres ABC in the development of new media delivery
systems ... Under the emerging news era that we have [other broadcasters] have
delivery systems that we do not have of our own and will never have of our own
- broadband services, for example. So this arrangement gives us access to that.[4]
The alliance with
Telstra will allow the ABC to take advantage of cutting-edge technologies and
skills in order to develop new and innovative online products. Co-productions
will ensure that the use of these technologies are maximised and that ABC
online skill requirements are enhanced.
Until recently,
organisation of information on the internet has been largely haphazard. These
days consumers are increasingly relying on portals which classify information
and services and provide a launching pad to a vast and growing amount of
material on the internet. These providers and distributors of internet content
are competing on the basis of the package they offer. Features such as
"Freemail accounts" (ie free email) are an increasingly important way
of competing for customers. Freemail provides a tangible benefit to consumers
particularly those who are not paid up subscribers to an internet service
provider or those who are travelling.
Editorial
Independence and Integrity
With regard to
advertising, the important issue is not advertising itself but rather the issue
of maintaining the independence of the ABC with respect to content (and
particularly with regard to its news and current affairs).
The Government
Senators reject the assertion of the Australian Democrats that agreeing to
engage in co-productions now will compromise the ABC's freedom of
decision-making. As Mr John Rolland, Director of Online Services for Telstra,
assured the Committee:
in terms of co-production, the ABC has the
absolute right to veto any weird and wonderful idea we may have; equally,
Telstra has the right to go and choose another co-production partner.[5]
ABC co-productions
have been commonplace with the ABC maintaining control over content.
Co-productions involve the co-operation, on a commercial basis, of the ABC with
outside organisations and the value of ABC radio and television content has
been enhanced as a result. Transparency in terms of co-productions is
to be supported as long as commercial confidentiality is respected.
The ABC has
emphasised its commitment to preserving its independence. Dr Schultz assured
the Committee of the ABC's attention to these values:
I can say to you that the non-commercial nature
of the ABC and the preservation of the integrity and independence of its
services and content are of paramount importance to the organisation, the
Board, to senior management and to all these who work for it.[6]
Non-Government
revenue
The ABC, while
operating in a tight fiscal environment, receives some $600 million in funding.
The ABC has
traditionally sought opportunities to supplement its funding from external
sources such as the ABC shops. Despite these shops reselling products not
produced by the ABC, neither Labor nor the Democrats have raised the issue that
the stock in ABC shops has jeopardised the independence of the ABC. All
Australians will benefit from the reinvestment of non-government revenue
derived from the ABC-Telstra agreement into additional programming and content
development.
Conclusion
This inquiry is a
demonstration that Labor and the Democrats are quite willing to intrude on the
independence of the ABC when it suits them.
The ABC must be
allowed to participate in the online environment without the fear of constant
interference from politicians trying to manage the day-to-day activities of the
Corporation.
Senator R
Lightfoot Senator
J Tierney
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page