Minority report by ALP Senators on Australian content regulation for commercial television broadcasters
1. Introduction.
1.1 The importance of television as a medium for
conveying society’s culture, and its significant role in promoting Australia’s
cultural identity and developing the local production industry, is recognised
through regulation of the Australian content of programming by the Broadcasting
Services Act 1997 (BSA). The consequence of the considerably higher cost of
making local programs compared with that of importing programs with foreign
content is that ratings are insufficient to ensure broadcasting of programs
with Australian content.
1.2 The effect of the relevant content regulation has
been diminished by the High Court decision in the Project Blue Sky case.
There it was decided that s160(d) of the BSA requires that content
regulations made by the ABA under section 122 of the BSA are subject to
the Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (CER). This decision has the
consequence of frustrating the objectives of the BSA by enabling New
Zealand programs to qualify in fulfilment of Australian content quotas.
1.3 In order to ensure the important function of
portrayal of Australian culture and identity is maintained the impact of this
decision needs to be overcome. There are two ways in which this might be
effectively achieved and the existing content rules thereby maintained. These
potential solutions are considered below: 2.1 – 3.2.
2. ABA amendment of Content Standard.
2.1
The
Government’s preferred solution was to give the Australian Broadcasting
Authority (ABA) the opportunity to amend the offending regulations, which
action the ABA is presently attempting to undertake. The draft new Australian
Content Standard released for public comment on 13 November 1998 by the ABA
allows New Zealand programs to qualify for Australian content quotas equally
with Australian programs. Clearly this action will not further the objects of
the BSA, nor will it protect the social values upon which the legislation
is founded.
2.2
The ECITA
Committee suggests that the ABA state in the introduction to its new standard
that Australian and New Zealand cultures are distinct, and that New Zealand
productions are only given special status in order to comply with CER Protocol
obligations.
2.3 It appears that the object of the BSA is
difficult to reconcile with the provisions of s160(d), thus placing the ABA in
a seemingly near impossible situation in complying with its obligations under
s122 of the BSA. In light of the effect of the draft Content Standard,
alternative solutions to enable effective content regulation need to be
considered and the ABA should explore and exhaust every avenue to achieve this
objective.
Recommendation 1
At first instance, Labor Senators prefer that the
ABA redraft the new Australian Content Standard so that it achieves the purpose
Australian Content Standards are intended to achieve.
3. Amendment of the Broadcasting Services Act 1997.
3.1 If the ABA proves unsuccessful in redrafting the
Australian Content Standard to properly protect the cultural values that the BSA
seeks to safeguard, a Labor Government would amend the BSA so that
the ABA would be able to set effective Australian content rules.
3.2
The Australian
film and television production industry supports repeal or effective amendment
of s160(d) so that the forces of international trade do not determine issues of
cultural policy. There are potentially 900 treaties which s160(d) would require
the ABA to take into account when creating a standard. The Industry argues that
certainty and an ability to properly regulate content require the repeal of
s160(d), which presently precludes meaningful local content regulation. The
impact of meaningless regulation is likely to be long-term erosion of true Australian
content and a consequent diminution of the cultural values the BSA seeks
to protect. Destruction of the Australian production industry is a possible
consequence which could further impact upon the quality, volume and
availability of Australian programs.
Recommendation 2
If Recommendation 1 is unachievable, it is
recommended that the Government legislate to amend section 160(d) of the BSA
to enable the ABA to continue to set effective Australian Content Standards.
4. Conclusion.
The crucial role of content regulation in
protecting the expression of Australian culture is recognised by Labor
Senators. The problems that the ABA is presently encountering in attempting to
regulate Australian content demand a prompt and effective solution. The alternative
procedures outlined above are the avenues a Labor government would pursue to
ensure resolution of the dilemma which threatens the important policy
objectives that the Broadcasting Services Act seeks to achieve.
________________________________
______________________________
Senator Mark Bishop
A.L.P. (W.A.) Senator Nick Bolkus A.L.P. (S.A.)
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page