Chapter 2
Review of departments and selected agencies
2.1
The Committee provides the following comments on the annual reports of
the two portfolio departments referred to it as well as reports from four
agencies within the portfolios as follows:
- Department
of Communications;
- Department
of Environment;
- Telecommunications
Universal Service Management Agency;
- Special
Broadcasting Service;
- Australian
Postal Corporation;
- Bureau
of Meteorology; and
- Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.
Communications portfolio
Department of Communications
2.2
The Department of Communications Annual Report 2013–14 was received on 17 October 2014
and tabled in the Senate on 27 October 2014.
2.3
The report outlines the consolidation in 2014–15 of the department's
three existing programmes into one programme titled 'Digital Technologies and
Communication Services'.[1]
2.4
The committee notes that, as a result of changes to the
administrative arrangements orders following the Federal election in 2013, the
following changes were made to the Department of Communications' functions and
structure:
-
ministerial responsibility for the Indigenous Communications
Programme and Indigenous Broadcasting Programme was transferred to the
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet by a legislative instrument under
section 32 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997; and
-
the Office of Spatial Policy was transferred to the Department of
Communication from the Department of Industry from 24 April 2014. The office no
longer exists and the functions are now delivered by the Data Policy Branch.[2]
2.5
The annual report also outlines the transfer of the Telecommunications
Universal Service Management Agency's functions to the department, which was announced
in the 2014–15 Budget.[3]
2.6
The Secretary noted in his review that the department's Corporate Plan
2014–17 had been launched in February 2014. The corporate plan outlines four strategic
priorities driving the direction and work of the department over the next three
years. The Secretary went on to state that the department had an 'ambitious
work agenda and a goal to position ourselves as the Australian Government's
pre-eminent advisor on communications'.[4]
2.7
In order to align departmental staff and resources with the new
strategic priorities, a large scale change process was commenced in 2013-14. At
the same time, all jobs in the department were redesigned, the capability of
all staff was assessed and staff were placed in the new structure. The total
staff reduction was between 20 and 25 per cent. The Secretary acknowledged
that it had been 'a difficult year in many ways for the Department' but
remained 'firmly committed to the change process upon which we have embarked
and the significant investment we will continue to make in developing the
capability of our people'.[5]
Performance reporting
2.8
In relation to programme 1.1, the report canvassed matters related to
the National Broadband Network including the provision of advice to the
Minister for Communications on policy, regulatory and rollout issues and
supporting the Government to implement its NBN policy objectives. The
discussion in programme 1.2 highlighted the department's involvement in the
promotion of the benefits and opportunities for telework. This included support
for the Australian Public Service Telework Trial. The telework trial was
conducted in 2013-14 with over 150 participants from seven departments.
The outcome of the trial will inform the department's 'Working from Anywhere'
initiative.[6]
Other measures discussed in programme 1.2 included the implementation of
programs designed to drive digital economy activity.[7]
2.9
Programme 1.3 covered the switchover from analog to digital television,
which was successfully completed on 10 December 2013. The switchover has
created space on the broadcasting spectrum for emerging services, such as
mobile broadband and wireless technology.[8]
2.10
The performance reporting section is clearly presented and provides
adequate assessment of how the department has progressed in meeting its key
performance indicators (KPIs), objectives, and deliverables. The flow of
information gives the reader a broad understanding of the work conducted in
each programme while still providing specific performance information, which is
comparable to the Portfolio Budget Statement (PBS).
Financial reporting
2.11
In the Secretary's review it was noted that:
...the Department reported an operating surplus of $1.0 million
(excluding depreciation) in 2013–14, down from $1.5 million (excluding
depreciation) in 2012–13.[9]
2.12
The committee notes that there was an operating deficit of
$5.4 million.[10]
Telecommunications Universal
Service Management Agency
2.13
The Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency (TUSMA)
Annual Report 2013–14 was tabled in the Senate on 29 October 2014.
2.14
The committee notes that this will be the final report for the TUSMA, as
the agency's functions will be transferred to the Department of Communications
as a part of the Government's broader reforms to reduce the number of small
government agencies. The Department of Communications will deliver these
functions from July 2015.[11]
2.15
The TUSMA Annual Report provides a detailed record of its activities
which included:
-
providing recommendations for future universal service reforms
with the aim of reducing the level of regulation on the Standard Telephone
Service and payphones;
-
the implementation of its safety net programme, as customers with
voice-only services transfer to the National Broadband Network; and
-
providing input into the Government's Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn
2014) Bill 2014 to remove unnecessary regulations from carriers and retail
service providers.[12]
2.16
The committee notes, in relation to the National Relay Service, that
three new services were released in 2013-14: the video relay service, Short
Message Service (SMS) relay service and the captioned relay services. The
annual report stated that approximately one in five connections came from one
of these three new service access options in the first year of operation.[13]
Performance reporting
2.17
Performance reporting on the agency's outcome is clearly presented and
provides an adequate assessment of how the agency has progressed in meeting their
KPIs and deliverables. The committee commends TUSMA for its use of tables and graphs
to report their performance and trend information.
Financial reporting
2.18
The committee notes that TUSMA reported an operating surplus of $500 000 dollars
for the 2013–14 financial year.[14]
Special Broadcasting Service
2.19
The Special Broadcasting Service (SBS) Annual Report 2013–14 was
received on 31 October 2014 and tabled in the Senate on
17 November 2014.
2.20
The SBS Annual Report provides a detailed record of SBS's activities
which included:
-
delivering multi-platform coverage across television, radio and
online of the 2014 Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)
World Cup;
-
the implementation of the first radio schedule in 18 years based
on audience insight and research to ensure programs delivered more relevant
content; and
-
delivering Australian audiences content on new media platforms.[15]
2.21
SBS also reported that the program The Feed had received
recognition at the 2014 Walkley Awards for its contribution to the news and
current affairs with one of its producers winning the Young Australian
Journalist of the Year Award.
2.22
The committee notes that SBS Chairman, Mr Joseph Skrzynski AO, stepped
down from his position in March 2014 after having served five years on the
SBS Board of Directors. Mr Michael Ebeid, Managing Director, remarked that
Mr Skryznski's:
...commitment to delivering on SBS's role of contributing to
successful multiculturalism, coupled with his passion for the media and astute
business mind, have guided the reshaping of our strategic direction when SBS
was at a crossroads. His push to include an explicit statement on our role in
aiding social cohesion in Australia and the exploitation of new technologies to
do this, are now reflected in the organisation's mission and drive its focus on
programming priorities.[16]
Performance reporting
2.23
The annual report provides a performance overview table which summarises
SBS's objectives, deliverables, KPIs and results.[17]
The table is clear and easy to read and includes page references to assist the
reader in accessing more detailed information.
2.24
The committee notes SBS's achievement of providing 95 per cent
of radio broadcasts in languages other than English, which surpassed the target
of 86 per cent.[18]
Financial reporting
2.25
The annual report provides a comprehensive financial summary including
expenditure and major investing and financing activities. The committee notes
that SBS recorded an operating surplus of $430 000 dollars for the
2013–14 financial year.[19]
Australian Postal Corporation (Australia
Post)
2.26
The Australia Post Annual Report 2013–14 was tabled in the Senate on 27 October 2014.
Financial reporting
2.27
The committee notes that for the 2013–14 financial year Australia Post
recorded a $116.2 million profit after tax.[20]
The report acknowledges that this result represented a decrease in profit of
34.5 per cent despite revenue increasing 8.3 per cent to
$6.4 billion.[21]
2.28
The discussion of the financial performance of Australia Post includes
an overview of the challenges facing the mail service business. In this
section, Australia Post also provides a five-year trend table of indicators
including revenue, return on equity and dividends declared. The overview also includes
graphs of profit before and after tax and shareholder return on equity from
2010 to 2014. The committee notes that changes to the Australian Accounting
Standard AASB 119 Employee benefits took effect on 1 July 2013.
Both graphs restate profit information for 2013 as if the change of accounting
standard had not come into effect. This provides a very helpful like-for-like
comparison of profit levels during that period, as well as clearly showing the
effect of the change of accounting standard on Australia Post's profits. A
similar restating is provided in the graph on shareholders return on equity.[22]
2.29
The profit/loss from reserved services for 2013 is also restated to a
loss of $198.0 million in the five-year trend table. However, as the pre-change
loss figure for 2013 has not been provided, readers are unable to ascertain the
impact of the accounting change on this indicator. The committee notes that the
loss for the reserved services reported in the 2012–13 annual report was $147.4
million.[23]
2.30
A further change to the trend table provided in this annual report is
the omission of operating profit/loss from regulated services and non-regulated
services data. This information was available in the previous two annual
reports. The loss on regulated services includes the profit/loss from inbound
letters and packets under the Universal Postal Union (UPU) arrangements. In
2013–14, the UPU arrangements generated a loss of $77 million, with the total
loss of $44.4 million for all inbound letters and parcels in the financial year.[24]
This level of information is not available in the annual report.
2.31
The committee notes that, unlike previous annual reports, the five-year
trend for reserved services letter volumes have been provided rather than total
mail volumes. While it is helpful to provide the reserved service volume trend,
the committee considers that information on total mail volumes should have been
included for completeness and transparency. In addition, the committee notes
that this data series is available from at least 2006 in previous annual
reports.[25]
2.32
The committee considers that, given the challenges facing Australia Post
in relation to its letters business, as much information as possible on this
area of its performance should be provided in the annual report.
Performance reporting
2.33
The discussion on Australia Post performance covers five areas: postal
services; parcel services; workforce; social contribution; and, driving
environmental change. Each section commences with summary information on highlights,
challenges and outlook. This provides a clear and concise introduction to the
detailed discussion which follows.
External scrutiny
2.34
Section 17(b) of the Commonwealth Authorities (Annual Reporting) Orders
2011 states that the Annual Report of Operations must include:
...particulars of reports about the authority made by the
Auditor-General, a Parliamentary committee, the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.[26]
2.35
However, Australia Post indicated in its statutory reporting
requirements that the requirement to report on reports made by outside bodies during
2013–14 was 'not applicable'.[27]
The committee notes that on 14 November 2013, the Senate referred to this committee
the matter of the performance, importance and role of Australia Post in
Australian communities and its operations in relation to licensed post offices.
During 2013–14, the committee held a number of public hearings including two at
which Australia Post appeared to give evidence (6 December 2013 and 17 March
2014). While the final report was released on 24 September 2014, which is
outside of the reporting period, the committee released a substantive interim
report on 11 December 2013.
2.36
The committee is disappointed that Australia Post chose to omit details
of the committee's inquiry and any reference to the interim report.
Environment portfolio
Department of Environment
2.37
The Department of Environment Annual Report 2013–14 was received on
30 October 2014 and tabled in the Senate on 17 November 2014.
2.38
Following the 2013 Federal election, the department was affected by the
machinery of government changes. The department acquired responsibility for
advising the Government on domestic climate change policy and functions
relating to Indigenous policy were transferred to the Department of the Prime
Minister and Cabinet.[28]
2.39
The Secretary's Review provides a detailed overview of the department's seven
outcomes and includes comments on the following matters:
-
supporting the delivery of the Government's priority to repeal
the carbon tax legislation;
-
establishing the Green Army Programme;
-
participating in the United Nations working group meetings to
progress negotiations on marine biodiversity;
-
commencing negotiations with the states and territories to create
a single streamlined administrative process for environmental approvals;
-
managing the reform and delivery of the National Landcare
Programme;
-
conducting consultation and research regarding the implementation
of the Emissions Reduction Fund and other elements of the Government's Direct
Action Plan on Climate Change; and
-
continuing to support the work to maintain the health and
resilience of the Great Barrier Reef.[29]
2.40
The committee notes that, in November 2013, the Department's Executive
Board commissioned a strategic review of the organisation. The review
considered the department's operations and structure in addition to the Government's
priorities and the broader fiscal environment. Consequently, departmental
activities were reprioritised and the department moved to a three group
structure.[30]
Performance reporting
2.41
The committee notes that the department's outcomes were consolidated
from seven to four in the 2014–15 Budget and will be reflected in their next
annual report.[31]
2.42
In the detailed discussion of each outcome the key, achievements are
provided as well as strategies that underpin those achievements. The report
also provides an evaluation and conclusion for each outcome. For each programme,
KPIs, deliverables and results are also listed alongside the 2013–14 budget
targets. Where the 2013–14 budget target has not been met, an explanation of
the reason is included. For example, in Programme 3.1 the number of flights
between Hobart and Casey was less than the budget target. The committee notes
that this was due to 'the Wilkins runway being affected by warmer temperatures
and resultant melt'.[32]
2.43
The annual report also includes reports on following seven Acts:
-
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999;
-
Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997;
-
Product Stewardship Act 2011;
-
Product Stewardship (Oil) Act 2000;
-
Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000;
-
Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Act 1989;
-
Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act
1989;
-
Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Act 2005; and
-
Water Act 2007.
Management and accountability
2.44
The department has a comprehensive and informative corporate governance
section, which details corporate and operational planning, risk management,
external scrutiny, environmental sustainability, and human resource management.[33]
2.45
In relation to external scrutiny, the committee notes that during
2013–14 the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) released two performance
audits specific to the department: Audit Report No. 17, Administration of
the Strengthening Basin Communities Program; and Audit Report No. 43, Managing
Compliance with Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Conditions of Approval.[34]
The committee notes that Audit Report No. 43 contained a range of findings and
recommendations including that:
The increasing workload on compliance monitoring staff over
time has resulted in Environment adopting a generally passive approach to
monitoring proponents' compliance with most approval conditions.[35]
2.46
The annual report contains a detailed background to each of the audits,
however, limited information is provided regarding the recommendations, which
were agreed to by the department. The committee notes that the department has
not included information on what work has been done to implement these
recommendations. The committee encourages the department to include this type
of information in future annual reports.
Financial reporting
2.47
The committee notes that the department reported for the 2013–14
financial year a deficit of $96.64 million. The annual report stated that
the shortfall was due to 'non-cash provisions for restoration obligations for
the Australian Antarctic Region'.[36]
Bureau of Meteorology
2.48
The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) Annual Report 2013–14 was tabled in the
Senate on 28 October 2014.
2.49
The Director's review provides a comprehensive summary of the key
achievements and challenges of the BOM for 2013–14. In particular, the Director,
Dr Rob Vertessy, drew attention to 2013 as being recorded as Australia's
warmest year in history. The year was marked by several heatwaves as well as cyclones,
floods and severe storms. The Director commended the BOM on the timely manner
in which they were able to provide accurate forecasts and warnings. [37]
2.50
Other activities outlined in the Director's review included:
-
the implementation of the Next Generation Forecast and Warning
System;
-
the pilot of the national heatwave alert service during the summer
of 2013–14;
-
the publication of the third biennial State of the Climate
report in conjunction with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organisation;
-
the realignment of BOM's organisational structure;
-
the launch of BOM's mobile website;
-
the development of a BOM weather application ('app'); and
-
the launch of the Marine Water Quality Dashboard for the Great
Barrier Reef.[38]
Performance reporting
2.51
The annual report provides a performance overview table which summarises
deliverables, KPIs and results.[39]
The table is clear and easy to read and includes page references to assist the
reader in accessing more detailed information. A discussion summarising the
performance of each deliverable is also included.
Financial performance
2.52
The report provides an informative discussion of BOM's financial
performance for 2013–14. The Bureau reported an operating deficit of $73.7 million
compared to a deficit of $69.4 million in 2012–13. The Bureau
states that the main financial drivers were an increase in employee costs and
consumable goods.[40]
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
2.53
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) Annual Report 2013–14
was received out-of-session on 30 October 2014 and tabled in the Senate on
17 November 2014.
2.54
The Chairman's Review detailed a number of key activities that were undertaken
during the reporting period across its three objectives, which included:
- managing
an outbreak of coral eating Crown-of-Thorns starfish;
- conducting
vessel and land-based patrols in high risk fishing areas;
-
expanding the Reef Guardians Programme to include 308 schools,
15 councils, 12 fisheries and 25 famers and graziers; and
-
changes to GBRMPA's organisational structure.[41]
2.55
The committee notes that, in November 2013, GBRMPA released the draft
Great Barrier Reef Region strategic assessment report and program report. The draft
program report proposed a 25-year management plan to strengthen the reef's
management practices. After the publication of the draft reports, the authority
conducted three months of community consultation, which included targeted
meetings, community forums and an online survey where approximately 6600 submissions
were received from individuals who have an interest in the Great Barrier Reef
and its future.[42]
The committee notes that the submissions have not been published on the
department's website. In an answer to a question on notice received in May
2014, that department stated that it is 'writing to all submitters seeking
permission to publicly release their submissions'.[43]
2.56
During 2013–14, the authority published the second Great Barrier Reef
Outlook Report. The report is prepared every five years and provides a summary
of the reef's health, management and future. At the request of the World
Heritage Committee, the Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report now contains
assessment of heritage values including Indigenous heritage and historic
heritage.[44]
Report on performance
2.57
GBRMPA's performance reporting on its objectives, deliverables and KPIs is
clearly presented and allows for easy comparison with the 2013–14 PBS. The flow
of information provides a narrative overview of the agency's performance and gives
the reader a broad understanding of the work GBRMPA undertakes in each of their
three objectives.
Management and accountability
2.58
The GBRMPA has provided an informative and detailed management and
accountability section. The section contained information on GBRMPA's strategic
and operational plans, ethical standards, the management of human resources and
external scrutiny.
2.59
The GBRMPA in its external scrutiny section has provided detailed
information of the reports by outside bodies, which includes ANAO and parliamentary
committee reports.[45]
The committee commends the GBRMPA for including a summary of the Senate Environment
and Communications References Committee inquiry into the management of the
Great Barrier Reef.[46]
2.60
The GBRMPA provides a transparent and detailed explanation of the
inquiry ordered by the Minister of the Environment in October 2013 into
allegations of potential conflicts of interest involving two board members. The
key findings from the report by Mr Robert Cornall AO found 'that
allegations...were unfounded' and provided advice that the GBMPA 'take no further
action in this matter'.[47]
Financial performance
2.61
In 2013–14, the GBRMPA received supplementary funding of approximately
$473 000 to assist with the payment of voluntary redundancies, which were
taken up by seventeen employees.[48]
2.62
The committee notes that the agency reported an operating deficit of $1.99 million
for the 2013–14 financial year, which included the unfunded depreciation
expense.[49]
Senator Anne Ruston
Chair
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page