Annual reports of Commonwealth departments
2.1
The committee was referred the 2018–19 annual reports of the following
Commonwealth departments for examination and report:
- Department of Health;
- Department of Social Services; and
- Services Australia.
2.2
The committee considers that annual reports of these Commonwealth
departments are of an apparently satisfactory standard.
Department of Health
Secretary's review
2.3
The Secretary of the Department of Health (DoH), Ms Glenys Beauchamp PSM,
highlighted a number of elements of DoH's work in her review of the 2018–19
financial year. These highlights included:
- continued delivery of Medicare through the initial reviews of 5
700 items on the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), additional services added to
the MBS, and an increase in bulk billing rates;
- reforms to aged care, notably the establishment of the Aged Care
Quality and Safety Commission;[1]
- establishment of a Mental Health Division within DoH;
- new listings on the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme;
- implementation of a $6 billion package for medical research;
- introduction of the Gold, Silver, Bronze, Basic four tier system
for private health insurance;
- development of a 10 year National Preventive Health Strategy; and
- development of Australia's first national sport plan, Sport
2030.[2]
2.4
Ms Beauchamp also noted that, in addition to this, DoH actioned 20 979
items of ministerial correspondence, primarily responding to letter campaigns
relating to My Health Record, natural therapies and private health insurance,
and Medicare rebates for psychological services.[3]
Chief Medical Officer's report
2.5
The Chief Medical Officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, also reported on the
year's activities. In particular, he commented on the issue of access to
medical care:
Addressing inequities in access to high quality medical care
has been a longstanding challenge in Australia. Despite many policy initiatives
over a number of years, some rural and remote locations have demonstrably
poorer access to health services than metropolitan areas.[4]
2.6
Professor Murphy commented that, in response to this challenge, DoH had
begun implementation of the Stronger Rural Health Strategy. This
strategy aims to build a sustainable, high quality health workforce that is
distributed across the country according to community need, particularly in
rural and remote communities, through a range of measures including incentives,
and targeted funding.[5]
2.7
Professor Murphy also commented on DoH's significant work in the
following areas:
- elimination of cervical cancer;
- reducing the incidence of blood borne viruses and sexually
transmissible infections;
- increased availability of flu vaccine; and
- securing and maintaining contingency levels of products in the
National Medical Stockpile.[6]
Performance reporting
2.8
DoH's purpose, as set out in its 2018–19 corporate plan is:
To support government and stakeholders to lead and shape Australia's
health and aged care system and sporting outcomes through evidence-based
policy, well targeted programs, and best practice regulation.[7]
2.9
In 2018–19, DoH continued to deliver this purpose through six outcomes
and reported its key performance results across these outcomes in its annual
performance statements. DoH met the majority of its 2018–19 performance targets
as follows:
- Outcome 1: Health system policy, design and innovation—all
eight targets were met;
- Outcome 2: Health access and support services—seven
targets were met, five targets were substantially met, and eight targets were
reported as not having data available;
- Outcome 3: Sport and recreation—all three targets were
met;
- Outcome 4: Individual health benefits—24 targets were met,
two targets were substantially met, and one target was reported as not having
data available;
- Outcome 5: Regulation, safety and protection—14 targets
were met and one target was substantially met; and
- Outcome 6: Ageing and aged care—nine targets were met,
three were substantially met, and one target was reported as not having data
available.[8]
2.10
The committee notes that eight targets under outcome 2 were reported as
not having data available. The committee also notes that in two of these
instances, the data not available relates to reducing the child (age 0–4) and
chronic disease related mortality rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people (compared to
non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) which is the same data that
was not able to be provided in DoH's previous annual report.[9]
2.11
The committee understands that the data required is due to be released
by the Australian Bureau of Statistics mid-2020[10],
and encourages DoH to include this information in its next annual report.
2.12
The committee commends DoH on meeting 65 out of 86 (or 75 per cent) of
its performance targets; and appreciates the detailed explanations provided
against each target, particularly where a target has not been fully met or
where data was not available.
2.13
DoH's annual performance statements are clearly set out and easy to read.
Further, the inclusion of summary tables for DoH's performance under each
outcome provides a helpful snapshot of DoH's work for 2018–19.
Financial reporting
2.14
The 2018–19 Budget and Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook delivered an
increase in funding of $20 billion to the Health portfolio over the forward
estimates. This increase brings the Budget to $115 billion in 2022–23.[11]
2.15
Of the total government expenditure in 2018–19, expenditure on health
functions accounted for 15.9 per cent, or $80.3 billion.[12] This figure represents an increase of $4.1 billion on health expenditure,
however a decrease of 0.1 per cent in the proportion of total government
expenditure.[13]
2.16
In 2018–19, DoH's total administered expenses were $69.7 billion. Of
this figure, over 66 per cent ($46.1 billion) was for payments for personal
benefits, including for medical and pharmaceutical services and private health
insurance rebates. A further $12.67 billion was expended on subsidies,
predominantly for aged care, and $9.2 billion was allocated to grants.[14]
2.17
DoH had an operating loss of $2.4 million (0.3 per cent of total
expenditure) however remained in a net asset position at 30 June 2019.[15]
Consultants and contracts
2.18
In 2018–19, DoH awarded 557 new consultancy contracts involving total
actual expenditure of $28.7 million.[16] Compared with the previous financial year, these figures show an increase in
the number of contracts awarded, however, a decrease in the total spend on new
contracts.[17]
2.19
The committee notes that DoH exceeded its target of 74 contracts with
Indigenous businesses, entering into 140 new contracts with a combined value of
$24.8 million.[18]
2.20
Whilst not a mandatory requirement of the Public Governance, Performance
and Accountability Rule 2014, the committee encourages DoH to provide further information
regarding its consultancy contracts, particularly given its highly variable
year on year new consultancy expenditure.
2.21
In 2018–19, 111 DoH contracts over $10 000 were exempt from publication
on AusTender as publication would disclose exempt matters under the Freedom
of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).[19] This is 25 fewer exempt contracts than the 136 exempt contracts DoH entered
into in 2017–18.[20]
2.22
The committee commends DoH on its annual report which provides a comprehensive
overview of its activities and performance in 2018–19.
Department of Social Services
Secretary's review
2.23
In her review of 2018–19, Ms Kathryn Campbell AO, CSC, Secretary of the
Department of Social Services (DSS), pointed to a number of initiatives
implemented by DSS which are designed to 'support Australians through the
welfare system and into jobs'.[21] In particular, Ms Campbell highlighted:
- the use of actuarial data analysis from the Australian Priority
Investment Approach to Welfare to identify groups of people who would benefit
from innovative projects to provide them with pathways to work;
- the extension of Try, Test and Learn Fund projects to at-risk
youth, refugees and other groups at risk of joblessness; and
- the redesign of Disability Employment Services to help people
with disability get and keep a job.[22]
2.24
The Secretary noted the launch of the Fourth Action Plan 2018–2020 under the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children 2009–2020,
noting:
The plan is an important step towards improving the safety
and wellbeing of Australia's children, with a strong focus on improving
outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and their families.[23]
2.25
The Secretary also noted the extension of the Cashless Debit Card
program to the Bundaberg and Hervey Bay regions of Queensland, explaining:
This expansion provides an opportunity to test the card's
flexibility as a tool to support people in non-remote locations and to help
address social problems. We worked closely with the community to design
tailored eligibility criteria for the trial site.[24]
2.26
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was also an important
focus for DSS, which saw:
- full scheme agreements for New South Wales and
South Australia come into effect on 1 July 2018;
- full scheme agreements finalised with Tasmania, the Northern
Territory, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria by 30 June 2019;
- finalisation of an agreement with Queensland agreement;
- establishment of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission on 1 July 2018;
and
- development of a Younger People in Residential Aged Care
Action Plan to reduce the number of younger people with disability in
residential aged care.[25]
Performance reporting
2.27
As set out in its Corporate Plan 2018–19, DSS' purpose is:
We work in partnership with government and non-government
organisations to achieve our mission through the effective development,
management and delivery of payments, policies, programs, and services.[26]
2.28
This purpose is delivered through four core areas:
- 1—Social Security
- 2—Families and Communities
- 3—Disability and Carers
- 4—Housing
2.29
In presenting its annual performance statements, DSS provided a
summary and analysis of its performance as well as a list of key results for
each of its core areas.
2.30
The committee notes the following key results across the four core
areas:
- successful delivery of the one-off Energy Assistance Payment to
approximately 5 million allowance and pension recipients;
- launch of a Commonwealth/state and territory government National
Consumer Protection Framework for Online Wagering and coordination of the
implementation of the first tranche of measures under this Framework;
- launch of the Employ their Ability campaign, which raised
awareness amongst employers of the benefits of employing people with
disability; and
- together with the Commonwealth Treasury, delivery of $1.5 billion
through the National Housing and Homelessness Agreement (NHHA) to support
housing and homelessness services across Australia. The NHHA provides funding
certainty to homelessness services with $620 million over five years dedicated
for homelessness, which is to be matched by state and territory governments.[27]
2.31
The committee considers that the annual performance statements comply
with the requirements as set out in Resource Management Guide 134.[28]
Financial performance
2.32
DSS received $420.5 million in departmental funding in 2018–19; and was
responsible for the management of $120 billion in government expenditure. Both
of these figures have grown in comparison with the previous financial year.[29]
2.33
The committee considers that the section of DSS' report entitled
'Managing our finances' on page 121 is clearly set out, and particularly
appreciates the inclusion of the financial resources table which indicates
trends in departmental finances between the previous and current financial
years. However, the committee encourages DSS to include more discussion in this
section in order to make the information in the table more accessible.
National Redress Scheme
2.34
DSS' report contains an annual report on the operation of the National
Redress Scheme (scheme), which was created in response to the Royal Commission
into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Established on 1 July 2018,
the scheme will operate for 10 years.[30]
2.35
Under the scheme, an individual who has experienced child sexual abuse
before 1 July 2018 may apply for redress, which can consist of three
components:
- a counselling and psychological component;
- a redress payment; and
- a direct personal response from each participating institution
responsible for the abuse.[31]
2.36
A redress payment is calculated using an assessment framework which
considers the individual's circumstances as well as the type of abuse they
experienced. The maximum redress payment is $150 000.[32]
2.37
In its first year of operation, the scheme received 4200 applications,
of which:
- 346 people were assessed as eligible (no one was assessed as
ineligible);
- 239 redress payments were made, ranging from $10 000 to $150 000;
and
- of the 346 eligible applications, 186 institutions were found to
have been responsible across the individual cases of abuse.[33]
2.38
The committee appreciates the high level of detail included in DSS'
annual report, and considers that it meets the relevant reporting requirements.
Services Australia
2.39
As noted in Chapter 1 of this report, the Department of Human Services
was renamed Services Australia following the Administrative Arrangements Order
of
29 May 2019.[34]
2.40
Services Australia's purpose remains:
The department delivers payments and associated services on
behalf of partner agencies and provides related advice to government on social
welfare, health and child support service delivery policy.[35]
Secretary's review
2.41
In her review of 2018–19, Ms Renée Leon PSM, Secretary of Services
Australia, set out that as a department, Services Australia's vision is to
'provide trusted services that are respectful, simple, helpful and
transparent'.[36]
2.42
The Secretary noted the increased use of modern technology in delivering
this vision, and highlighted the use of digital assistants in responding to
customer inquiries and the incorporation of suggestions from staff to improve
interactions with customers.[37]
2.43
Ms Leon also noted Services Australia's work in other areas of
government services, pointing to the use of Services Australia's Cyber Security
Branch to provide a secure internet gateway for the Australian Electoral
Commission during the federal election in May 2019.[38]
2.44
The Secretary noted that in delivering services during 2018–19, the
department had dealt with:
- payments totalling $184 billion;
- more than 3.5 million social security and welfare claims;
- more than 429 million Medicare services;
- more than 63 500 aged care claims; and
- approximately 980 million interactions with individual
Australians.[39]
Performance reporting
2.45
Services Australia has one outcome:
Support individuals, families and communities to achieve
greater self-sufficiency; through the delivery of policy advice and high
quality accessible social, health and child support services and other
payments; and support providers and businesses through convenient and efficient
service delivery.[40]
2.46
This outcome is delivered through three programs:
- Program 1.1: Services to the Community—Social Security and
Welfare;
- Program 1.2: Services to the Community—Health; and
- Program 1.3: Child Support.[41]
2.47
In its delivery of program 1.1, Services Australia met six out of nine
targets. The three targets that were not met were:
- Criterion 1: Customer satisfaction: Achievement of customer
satisfaction standards;
- Criterion 5: Achievement of face-to-face service level standards:
Average wait time; and
- Criterion 7: Achievement of processing service level standards:
Claims processed within standard.[42]
2.48
The committee notes, however, that Criteria 1 and 5 were not met by relatively
small margins. The target for Criterion 7 was to process over 82 per cent of
claims within standard. Services Australia achieved 68 per cent. The committee
notes Services Australia's explanation that the 'reduction in the department's
performance against this measure during 2018–19 reflects the priority given to
reducing the number of claims on hand, in particular older claims'.[43]
2.49
Services Australia successfully met all 11 targets under program 1.2. In
assessing its own performance, the department noted that 'five performance
measure results improved, four are comparable, and one declined, compared to
2017–18 results'.[44]
2.50
Under program 1.3, Services Australia met only three out of seven
targets. The report set out:
Overall, the 2018–19 results for the Child Support Program
performance measures are consistent with previous years. While the average
speed of answer for Child Support customers was longer in 2018–19 compared to
2017–18, the other performance measures that did not meet annual targets in
2017–18 improved in 2018–19, demonstrating the department's commitment to
delivering high-quality services and payments for the community on behalf of
Government.[45]
2.51
The committee recognises Services Australia's transparent approach to
performance reporting. Where targets were not met, DHS provided clear
information about the outcome, the context surrounding the result and the work
being undertaken to improve on its performance.
2.52
The committee considers that including the performance measures from
previous reporting years in the performance statement greatly enhances the
transparency and utility of the annual report in describing the performance of
the entity; and encourages Services Australia to continue to include this
information in future annual reports.
Financial reporting
2.53
In 2018–19, Services Australia administered approximately $184.0 billion
in payments, or around 38 per cent of government outlays. The department
reported an operating deficit of $33.8 million after adjustment for unfunded depreciation
and amortisation expenses and the revaluation of assets. This represents a 3
per cent variance from the budgeted net cost of services of $4.8 billion.[46]
2.54
The committee considers that the information provided by Services
Australia in section 11.1 Statement of Financial Performance is clear
and easy to follow, notably, the level of detail provided in this section is
sufficient yet not overwhelming for a member of the public to understand
2.55
Overall, the committee considers that Services Australia has produced an
informative and clearly presented annual report which meets the required
reporting standards.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page