21 November 2011
© Commonwealth of Australia 2011 ISBN 978-0-642-79577-9 (printed version) ISBN 978-0-642-79578-6 (HTML version)
View the report as a single document - (PDF 1540KB)
View the report as separate downloadable parts:
A brief explanation of cabin crew ratiosThe current proposal to alter Australia’s cabin crew ratioThe history of proposed ratio changes and prior parliamentary considerationEarlier consideration of a 1:50 cabin crew ratio in AustraliaCivil Aviation Legislation Amendment (Mutual Recognition with New Zealand) Bill 20052007 Senate EstimatesGranting of exemptions to the 1:36 ruleThe rationale behind the proposalAircraft design and certificationWorld’s best practice?Cost savingsCommittee comment
The role of crew in maintaining safety and securityMeasuring ratios and safety through evacuation demonstrationsThe role of passengers in emergency evacuationsThe role of passengers in security incidentsCommittee commentsCASA’s review processesTrainingCrew FatigueAirside security and ASIC passesCommittee’s overall conclusions
Introduction The right way to frame the questionNo persuasive evidence that ISR produces inferior safety or security outcomesOther ArgumentsBecause Australia has historically had a higher ratioArguments from the TWU and the FAAA Because the ISR would bring cost savings and these are a bad thing
Back to top
Senate
House of Representatives
Get informed
Bills
Committees
Get involved
Visit Parliament
Website features
Parliamentary Departments