Chapter 2 Dental Services in Australia
2.1
This chapter provides a brief overview of the factors associated with
poor dental and oral health and the adult dental services framework in Australia.
Detailed information on each of these issues is available from a number of
authoritative sources. Rather than attempting to replicate this information,
the intention is to highlight some key facts, and provide sufficient context to
support consideration of issues arising in subsequent chapters.
2.2
The chapter also reviews developments in dental and oral health policy
over time, concluding with a summary of the key initiatives being supported
under the 2012 Dental Health Reform Package.
Factors associated with poor dental and oral health
2.3
The interaction of factors associated with poor dental and oral health
is complex. As well as individual factors, there is a complex interplay of
structural, social and economic factors. Factors associated with poor dental
and oral health in adults include:
n Possession of a
concession card: concession card holders are more likely to have poorer oral
health compared to non-card holders. This is linked to unfavourable dental
visiting patterns (i.e. do not visit the same dentist, do not visit yearly,
seek treatment for a problem rather than for a check–up).[1]
n Access to public
sector dental services: limited funding and workforce shortages within the
public sector have been identified as contributing to the poorer oral health
status of eligible patients.
n Affordability of
private care: in 2008, 46.7 per cent of concession card holders delayed dental
treatment due to cost compared to 30.2 per cent of non–card holders.[2]
n Geography: remote, rural
and regional residents have a higher rate of unfavourable visiting patterns at
38 per cent, which increases the risk of poor oral health, as compared to urban
residents (27 per cent).[3]
n Workforce
distribution: workforce is also predominantly centred around urban areas, with
81.0 per cent of dentists, 87.4 per cent of dental hygienists, 62.2 per cent of
dental therapists, 74.7 per cent of oral health therapists and 67.5 per cent of
dental prosthetists practising in major cities.[4]
n Indigenous status: 40.2
per cent of Indigenous Australians have unfavourable visiting patterns as
opposed to 28.2 per cent of non-Indigenous Australians.[5]
n Individual behaviour:
diet and oral health behaviours contribute to oral health; for example, the
consumption of bottled water may reduce the intake of fluoride (which provides
a protective effect for teeth), and the consumption of sugary and acidic foods
can lead to an increased risk of dental decay.[6]
2.4
The higher frequency of these factors in particular population groups
means that some groups are more likely to have poor dental and oral health.[7]
The needs of these specific population groups are considered in more detail in
Chapter 4.
Responsibility for adult dental services
2.5
The Australian health system is complex. Prior to 1946 the Commonwealth
Government had limited responsibility for health services in Australia, this
being confined to quarantine matters. However, following amendment to the Australian
Constitution in 1946, the Commonwealth’s powers were extended allow it to
legislate with respect to:
The provision of maternity allowances, widows' pensions,
child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits,
medical and dental services (but not so as to authorise any form of civil
conscription), benefits to students and family allowances.[8]
2.6
As a result, responsibility for funding and provision of health services
is now shared across all levels of government and the private sector. Generally,
the Commonwealth sets national policy and contributes to health funding
primarily through Medicare, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, Private Health
Insurance rebates and direct payments to state and territory governments. States
and territories (and to a lesser extent local governments) are responsible for funding
and delivery of public health services. Private sector involvement through private
health insurance and private sector service adds to the complexity of the
system.
2.7
Unlike other health services, dental health services in Australia have
not been generally covered by Medicare. The majority of dental services are
paid for by individuals, with or without assistance from private health
insurance. Public dental services are available in all states and territories. For
adults, eligibility for these services is largely determined by eligibility for
concession cards[9], although type of
concession cards and age eligibility vary across jurisdictions, as do
co-payment requirements.[10]
2.8
Waiting times for public dental services are often long (between two and
five years in some areas), with up to 400,000 adults on waiting lists across
Australia. Treatment is often focused on emergency care rather than the
provision of preventive or restorative services.[11]
Public dental services also offer denture services to patients, but waiting
times are long and patients may have to wait months for an appointment.[12]
Those on waiting lists are generally lower-income individuals who often have no
choice but to wait for care.
Overview of Commonwealth dental policy
2.9
Australia’s first national oral health plan was developed by the
National Oral Health Advisory Committee and endorsed by AHMAC in 2004. The
purpose of the plan was to ‘improve health and well-being across the Australian
population by improving oral health status and reducing the burden of disease’.[13]
The plan identified the following seven areas for action:
n promoting oral health
across the population;
n children and
adolescents;
n older people;
n low income and social
disadvantage;
n people with special
needs;
n Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander peoples; and
n workforce
development.[14]
2.10
An updated national oral health plan for 2014-23 is currently being developed
by a subcommittee of the National Oral Health Plan Monitoring Group to be
finalised by the end of 2013.[15]
2.11
Established in 2008 the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission
(NHHRC) was tasked with providing a long term health reform plan for Australia.
In 2009, the NHHRC reported proposing a range of health measures across many
health areas[16]. The outcomes included
six recommendations for dental health, including Recommendation 83 which proposed:
We recommend that all Australians should have universal
access to preventive and restorative dental care, and dentures, regardless of
people’s ability to pay. This should occur through the establishment of the
‘Denticare Australia’ scheme. Under the ‘Denticare Australia’ scheme, people
will be able to select between private or public dental health plans.
‘Denticare Australia’ would meet the costs in both cases. The additional costs
of Denticare could be funded by an increase in the Medicare Levy of 0.75 per
cent of taxable income.[17]
2.12
In its response to the NHHRC Final Report, the Government stated with
regard to Recommendation 83:
The Government supports the recommendation’s aim of
increasing access to dental care. The Government is seeking to introduce better
targeting of dental services to those Australians most in need through the
closure of the existing Medicare chronic disease dental scheme, with saving
redirected to the proposed Commonwealth Dental Health Program and Medicare Teen
Dental Plan. However, the proposed legislative changes have been blocked by the
Senate.[18]
2.13
In the 2011-12 Budget, funding was allocated for a National Advisory
Council on Dental Health (NACDH) to:
… assist the Government through the development and provision
of advice to the Minister for Health and Ageing on dental health, including
prioritising areas for improvement.[19]
2.14
In September 2011, the NACDH was established to provide ‘strategic,
independent advice on dental health issues, as requested by the Minister for
Health and Ageing, to the Government’. Its priority task was to provide advice
on dental policy options and priorities for consideration in the 2012–13
Budget.[20]
2.15
In its report, the NACDH considered:
n the scope of the
problem, for both adults and children, by comparing oral health indicators
across different income levels, private health insurance status, looking at
effects on health and wellbeing linked to poor oral health, and the flow-on
effects to the broader health system;
n the dental system,
including funding arrangements and workforce issues;
n gaps in service
provision and funding; and
n causes of poor oral
health.
2.16
The NACDH provided its options for dental funding to the Minster for
Health and Ageing, the Hon Tanya Plibersek MP, in February 2012. These
included:
n Children
§
A universal individual capped benefit entitlement for all
children up to the age of 18, providing basic dental preventive services and
general treatment through both the public and private dental sectors;
§
Universal public dental access for children, providing basic
dental preventive services and general treatment through the public sector.
Concession card holder children would have no co-payments, where non-concession
card holders may have limited co-payments;
n Adults
§
Means tested individual capped benefit entitlement for adults –
concession card eligible only, providing basic dental preventive services and
general treatment through both the public and private dental sectors;
§
Means tested public dental access for adults – concession card
eligible only, providing basic dental preventive services and general
treatment;
n Children and adults
§
Integrated options could be developed using the above options.
2.17
Each option included methods of scaling the implementation based on
different eligibilities (i.e. concession card holders, recipients of different
Government payments) as well as including chronic disease patients.[21]
Commonwealth support for dental services
2.18
Successive governments have held different views of the Commonwealth’s
role in funding public dental services. As a result over the years there have
been various policy approaches and programs which have affected funding and
support of dental services by the Commonwealth.
2.19
The Commonwealth’s first major involvement in supporting dental services
came about in 1973 with the implementation of the Australian School Dental
Program, which aimed to provide comprehensive dental treatment for all
Australian school children up to the age of 15 years. By the early 1980s direct
funding for this program from the Commonwealth had ceased.[22]
2.20
In 1994 funding was provided for the Commonwealth Dental Health Program (CDHP)
which aimed:
… to improve the dental health of financially disadvantaged adults,
reduce barriers to dental care, ensure equitable access and improve prevention
and early intervention.[23]
2.21
The CDHP was discontinued in 1997 and although direct funding of dental
services by the Commonwealth declined significantly at this time, indirect
funding increased with the introduction of rebate incentives for private health
insurance.
2.22
In 2004, the Chronic Disease Dental Scheme (CDDS) was implemented as
part of the Allied Health and Dental Care Initiative (AHDCI). The CDDS provided
limited Medicare benefits for dental services available to people whose chronic
conditions were significantly exacerbated by dental problems.[24]
2.23
In 2007 the newly elected Labor Government announced that it intended to
close the CDDS and redirect the funds to a revived CDHP from July 2008. The
Government also committed to a scheme to provide annual dental check-ups for
eligible teenagers (12 to 17 years old) though the means tested Medicare Teen
Dental Plan (MTDP). Although the MTDP was introduced in July 2008, closure to
the CDDS was blocked by the Senate and the CDHP was not implemented.
2.24
In late 2012, after the announcement of a $4.1 billion Dental Reform
Package the CDDS was discontinued, closing to new patients on 8 September
2012 and with no further treatment available to exiting patients after
30 November 2012.
Dental Reform Package
2.25
In forming Government in 2010, the agreement between the Australian
Greens Party and the Australian Labor Party stated in part (Clause 6.1 (b)):
That Australia needs further action on dental care and that
proposals for improving the nation’s investments in dental care should be
considered in the context of the 2011 Budget.[25]
2.26
The 2011-12 Budget identified that:
In line with the Government’s agreement with the Australian
Greens, the Government has committed that significant reforms to dental health
will be a priority for the 2012–13 Budget.[26]
2.27
In accordance with the Agreement with the Greens, and informed by the
outcomes of the NACDH the 2012–13 Budget included funding measures for dental
described as ‘foundational activities’. These foundational activities include:
n $345.9
million over three years to alleviate pressure on public dental waiting lists;
n $158.6 million over
four years to increase the capacity of the dental workforce (expanded over
previously announced workforce measures);
n $10.5 million for
oral health promotion activities; and
n $450,000 for pro
bono dental service provision.
2.28
On 29 August 2012, the Minister for Health, the Hon Tanya Plibersek MP,
announced a $4.1 billion Dental Reform Package. The package which will replace
the CDDS and the MTDP[27] includes:
n $2.7 billion over six
years for a Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) - Grow Up Smiling a
child dental health program which will provide a capped benefit entitlement for
basic dental services for eligible children aged 2 to 17 years. The CDBS will
start on 1 January 2014 and replace the MTDP which will cease to
operate on 31 December 2013;
n $1.3 billion over four
years for a National Partnership Agreement (NPA) to expand public dental
services for around 1.4 million low income adults. The NPA will commence on 1
July 2014 and replaces the now discontinued CDDS;
n $225 million over
four years for a Flexible Grants Program for dental infrastructure in outer
metropolitan, rural and regional areas to reduce barriers to accessing public
dental services for people living in those areas; and
n $77.7 million for the
Dental Relocation and Infrastructure Support Scheme to assist dentists to
relocate into regional and remote communities.[28]
Committee comment
2.29
As noted in Chapter 1, the scope of the inquiry as defined by the terms
of reference is confined to consideration of the Commonwealth’s $1.3 billion
commitment to a NPA to expand public dental services for adults (adult dental
services NPA). However, the Committee understands that an adult dental services
NPA has to be considered in a context which acknowledges the effects of the
wider package of dental reform.
2.29
The implications of foundational activities are also key considerations.
Of particular relevance to the current inquiry is the $345.9 million for a NPA
(Dental Waiting List NPA) to alleviate pressure on public dental waiting lists.
In addition, consideration will be given to a number of general policy issues
associated with the implementation of the Dental Reform Package. This will
include consideration of the need for a better coordinated and strategic
approach to dental health policy and delivery of dental services.