Appendix B – Relevant recommendations in The Blame Game[1]
report
Recommendation 1
The Australian, state and territory governments develop and
adopt a national health agenda. The national agenda should identify policy and
funding principles and initiatives to:
n rationalise the
roles and responsibilities of governments, including their funding
responsibilities, based on the most cost-effective service delivery
arrangements irrespective of governments’ historical roles and
responsibilities;
n improve the long term
sustainability of the health system as a whole;
n support the best and
most appropriate clinical care in the most cost effective setting;
n support affordable
access to best practice care;
n rectify structural
and allocative inefficiencies of the whole health system, as it currently
operates;
n give a clear
articulation of the standards of service that the community can expect;
n redress inequities
in service quality and access; and
n provide a reporting
framework on the performance of health service providers and governments. (para 3.52)
Recommendation 7
The Australian Government develop explicit purchasing
agreements for clinical training with public health care providers. The
purchasing agreement would cover:
n funding levels —
adequate to support existing and planned levels of training in both
metropolitan and regional locations;
n specified outcomes —
including the quantity and quality of training conducted; and
n performance measures
— allowing timely assessment of progress in meeting obligations. (para 4.82)
Recommendation 11
The Minister for Health and Ageing, in consultation with state
and territory health ministers and as part of the national health agenda (see
recommendation no. 1), develop standards for the delivery of health
services in regional, rural and remote areas. (para 5.41)
Recommendation 13
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government either:
n vary its funding
arrangements so that the ‘utilisation growth factor’ can rise or fall in
response to the actual level of services provided on the basis of clinical
need; or
n define the number of
services that it will fund, in a way that is consistent with its funding and
indexation formulae. (para 7.33)
Recommendation 14
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government ensure that indexation
arrangements reflect actual cost increases discounted by an appropriate
efficiency dividend. (para 7.34)
Recommendation 15
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government should define the standards
that states must meet to satisfy the principle of equitable access to public
hospital services, particularly in relation to people living in rural and
regional areas. (para 7.43)
Recommendation 16
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government consider dividing funds into
separate streams through which it can:
n provide general
revenue assistance to the states as a supplement to the Goods and Services Tax
(GST) pool; and
n make specific
purpose payments to the states to support its policy objectives in relation to
public hospital services and health system reform. These payments:
Þ should
be linked to outcomes and performance standards; and
Þ should not be
absorbed into the GST pool. (para 7.49)
Recommendation 17
The Australian Government should make specific purpose
payments to the states and territories for the provision of public hospital
services subject to horizontal fiscal equalisation using the Commonwealth
Grants Commission’s ‘inclusion’ method rather than by being absorbed into the
Goods and Services Tax (GST) pool. This would require amendments to the A
New Tax System (Commonwealth –State Financial Arrangements) Act 1999. (para
7.53)
Recommendation 18
The Australian Government should ensure that the terms and
conditions associated with future public hospital arrangements do not lock-in
historical Commonwealth-state service provision models. Future arrangements
should:
n support the movement
of services between Commonwealth and state funded programs where this leads to
better quality or more cost effective care; and
n allow post hoc
adjustments to Commonwealth-state funding arrangements if necessary. (para
7.59)
Recommendation 19
The Australian Government consider extension of Medicare
Benefits Schedule funding, or substitute grant funding, to public outpatient
and emergency department services. (para 7.65)
Recommendation 24
The Australian Government, in conjunction with the states and
territories, give priority to undertaking research to develop mechanisms to
make waiting lists for public hospital elective surgery fairer. (para 9.15)
Recommendation 25
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government provide incentives for the
states and territories to report in a consistent manner on patient waiting
times for access to specialists in outpatient clinics. (para 9.20)
Recommendation 26
In negotiating future Australian Health Care Agreements, or
substitute arrangements, the Australian Government require all public hospitals
to:
n be accredited by the
Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (or an equivalent accreditation
agency); and
n publish their
accreditation reports within three months of being completed. (para 9.38)
Recommendation 28
The Australian Government require all state and territory
governments to regularly publish reports on sentinel events occurring in their
public hospitals. (para 9.47)
Recommendation 29
The Australian Government support the development of hospital
and clinician‑based performance information systems to better inform
patients about the competence of health care providers and strengthen
accountability of health professionals and health service providers. Reporting
systems should allow, where appropriate, for performance information to be
qualified to reflect differences in the type of patients being treated.
(para 9.54)