Preliminary pages
Foreword
I
welcome the opportunity for the House of Representatives Standing Committee on
Agriculture, Resources, Fisheries and Forestry to provide an advisory report to
the House on the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment
Bill 2012. The Bill seeks to make reforms to the approval, registration and
reconsideration of agricultural and veterinary (AgVet) chemicals. This will
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the National Registration Scheme
(NRS) for AgVet chemicals and products overseen by the Australian Pesticides
and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).
The
Bill was referred to the Committee by the Selection Committee on 29 November
2012. The Committee subsequently adopted the inquiry and called for written
submissions. A public hearing was held in Canberra on 4 February 2013 with a
range of stakeholders, some of whom had concerns with the Bill.
The
issues raised with the Committee included stakeholders highlighting their
concerns that aspects of the Bill would impact the AgVet chemicals sector.
Stakeholders highlighted areas including the proposal for a preliminary
assessment process and also the proposal for a system of mandatory
re-registration and re-approval for AgVet chemicals and products.
The
Committee found that the proposed preliminary assessment process has been
designed to increase the quality of applications provided to the APVMA. While
acknowledging concerns that this process may create some costs for applicants
for registration of AgVet chemical and products, the Committee stated that the
process would allow the APVMA to concentrate its resources on providing more
timely assessments of applications and reduce delays in evaluating deficient
applications.
Over
the course of the inquiry, the Committee heard that some AgVet chemicals and
products had been in use in Australia for well over 40 years. The Committee was
concerned that many of these chemicals and products had not been tested against
contemporary standards for human, animal and plant health and safety. This
underscores the importance of provisions in the Bill for a mandatory system of
AgVet chemical and product re-registration and re-approval based on the risk
profiles of each chemical or product as determined under guidelines published
by the APVMA.
Australia
needs to have a robust, systematic and efficient system of AgVet chemical and
product regulation. The reforms proposed in this Bill will allow the APVMA to
build on its already well-regarded regulatory credentials and ensure Australia
retains its international competitiveness in the AgVet sector.
The
Committee has recommended that the Bill be passed.
Hon Dick Adams MP
Chair
Membership of the Committee
Chair
|
Hon Dick Adams MP
|
|
Deputy
Chair
|
Mr Alby Schultz MP
|
|
Members
|
Mr Darren Cheeseman MP
|
Mr Rob Mitchell MP
|
|
Mr George Christensen MP
|
Mr Dan Tehan MP
|
|
Mr Geoff Lyons MP
|
Mr Rowan RamseyMP* (from 29/11/12)
|
* Denotes supplementary member, appointed to the Committee
for this inquiry only.
Committee Secretariat
Secretary
|
Mr David Brunoro
|
Inquiry
Secretary
|
Mr Muzammil Ali
|
Research
Officers
|
Mr Nathan Fewkes
|
Administrative
Officers
|
Ms Jazmine Rakic
|
|
Ms Louise Goss
|
Terms of reference
The Terms of Reference comprise the text of the Bill and
without limiting the scope of these Terms of Reference, the Committee has
resolved to target a number of key areas for consideration:
- Initial assessment and registration processes (Schedule No. 1 of
the Bill), including:
- Factors that affect efficient regulation, including the risk
assessment process;
- Re-approval and re-registration of agricultural and veterinary
chemicals (Schedule No. 2 of the Bill), including:
- The need for re-approval /and re-registration;
- The process and practical effects (including the financial
impacts) for all stakeholders including the regulator;
- International comparisons and trade issues, including the effects
on small companies; and
- Consultation processes and outcomes:
- Including intergovernmental consultations.
List of abbreviations
AgVet
|
Agricultural and Veterinary
|
ANAO
|
Australian National Audit Office
|
APVMA
|
Australian Pesticides and
Veterinary Medicines Authority
|
ARFF
|
Standing Committee on
Agriculture, Resources, Fisheries and Forestry
|
the Bill
|
Agricultural and Veterinary
Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
|
BRCWG
|
COAG Business Regulation and
Competition Working Group
|
Canadian PMRA
|
Health Canada – Pest Management
Regulatory Agency
|
COAG
|
Council of Australian Governments
|
Committee
|
Standing Committee on Agriculture,
Resources, Fisheries and Forestry
|
DAFF
|
Department of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Forestry
|
MORAG
|
Manual of Requirements and
Guidelines
|
MoU
|
Memorandum of Understanding
|
NRS
|
National Registration Scheme
|
OBPR
|
Office of Best Practice
Regulations
|
RIS
|
Regulation Impact Statement
|
US EPA
|
United States Environmental
Protection Agency
|
VFF
|
Victorian Farmers Federation
|
WWF Australia
|
World Wildlife Fund Australia
|
List of recommendations
4 Conclusion
Recommendation 1
The Committee recommends that the House of Representatives
pass the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
without amendment.
5 Dissenting Report
Recommendation 1
Remove the re-registration process from the bill
Recommendation 2
Set up a troika taskforce of Industry, the Department and the
APVMA to urgently evaluate and improve the internal systems within the APVMA to
increase the regulators efficiency and effectiveness and the speed of review of
at risk chemistries