Chapter 3 Issues and Conclusions
Consolidation of RAAF College
3.1
In its written evidence to the inquiry, Defence submitted that a
significant factor driving the proposed relocation project is the anticipated
cost and operational efficiencies to be derived from partial collocation of
RAAF College elements. The Committee noted that while RAAF College units would
be removed from Point Cook Base (RAAF Williams), Vic and RAAF Base Edinburgh,
SA, some RAAF College elements – namely, the School of Postgraduate Studies,
Corporal Promotion Centre - would continue to operate at RAAF Base Richmond,
NSW and RAAF Base Amberley, Qld. Given the expected financial and operational
benefits of partial collocation, the Committee was interested to know whether
Defence had considered the consolidation of all RAAF College elements at a
single site.
3.2
At the public hearing conducted in Wagga Wagga, Defence explained that
the option had been considered, but had been rejected. This decision was based
partially upon the findings of studies conducted in New Zealand and the United
Kingdom, which recommended against the collocation of recruit and officer
training. Further, Defence elaborated on the synergies and opportunities
expected to arise from the development of discrete recruit and officer training
centres of excellence at established, operational air-bases, which can provide
for the development of expertise in differing areas of specialisation and
future career opportunities on-site. In respect of the postgraduate training
conducted at RAAF Bases Richmond and Amberley, Defence added that this
comprised short courses for junior non-commissioned officers, which were
delivered on location by a small number of staff out-posted from the training
headquarters at RAAF Base Wagga.[1]
Planning Considerations
3.3
Defence’s main submission recorded that neither RAAF Base East Sale, nor
RAAF Base Wagga has a current Master Plan, although a Master Plan for the
former is in development.[2] The Committee expressed
concern that the lack of a Master Plan may result in additional costs, either
through the discovery of unexpected conditions at the sites, or through
expenditure on infrastructure that may be rendered obsolete by future planning
decisions and further rationalisation of Defence properties. Defence assured
members that the absence of a consolidated plan did not mean a lack of
historical information, stating that detailed infrastructure studies had been
undertaken at each base. Defence also reiterated the government’s commitment
to the development of RAAF Base Wagga and RAAF Base East Sale as long-term
centres for RAAF training.[3]
Environmental Considerations
Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD)
3.4
Defence intends that, where appropriate, all facilities associated with
the RAAF College relocation project will be designed in accordance with the
Department of Environment and Heritage’s ESD Design Guide, a copy of
which was tabled for the Committee. The Committee welcomed this initiative,
and was interested to know what energy use rating the facilities would achieve.[4]
Defence informed members that, according to the rating scale outlined in the
Department of Environment and Heritage publication, office accommodation at
RAAF Base Wagga would meet the recommended best-practice target of 4.5 stars,
while a rating in excess of four stars would be achieved at RAAF Base East
Sale.[5]
3.5
Defence noted that these ratings were applicable to office facilities
only. In terms of living-in accommodation, Defence intends to apply the
standard established by Section J of the Building Code of Australia, which
Defence asserted
…is similar top the five-star rating mentioned previously.[6]
Protection of Native Flora
3.6
Defence’s main submission reported that the Environmental Management
Plan for RAAF Base East Sale had recommended minimisation of removal of Red Gum
trees, as this species is deemed to be “regionally significant”.[7]
At the public hearing, Defence explained that it had originally identified 26
Red Gums for removal from the Sale development site, but had subsequently
reoriented buildings with the result that only 11 of the trees would be
removed. In addition, Defence intends to gather seeds from the remaining trees
for future propagation and replanting.[8]
Protection of Native Avifauna
3.7
Defence explained that the RAAF Base Wagga construction site will lie
within the flight path of the Superb Parrot. However, a consultant’s report has
revealed that the impact is not expected to be significant as the site is
already considerably developed and the parrot does not nest at the Base.
Defence intends to mitigate any deleterious impacts through the retention and
planting of Yellow Box trees favoured by the bird.[9]
Base Population
3.8
According to Defence’s main submission, the relocation proposal would
increase permanent personnel numbers at RAAF Base East Sale and RAAF Base Wagga
by 63 and 98 respectively. In addition, RAAF Base East Sale would provide
training to some 690 officer cadets, while RAAF Base Wagga would train
approximately 1,200 new recruits.[10] In order to understand
the impact of the proposal upon existing base services and infrastructure, the
Committee asked for an estimate of the anticipated maximum population of each
base following completion of the works. Defence stated that RAAF Base Wagga
currently has 510 permanent staff and an average student population of 640,
totalling 1,150 personnel. RAAF Base East Sale currently has a population of
800, comprising 710 permanent staff and 90 students. It is estimated that,
following the completion of the relocation project, the population at RAAF Base
Wagga will increase by a magnitude of almost 50 per cent, and RAAF Base East
Sale will accommodate a 25 per cent population increase.[11]
Accommodation Standards
3.9
It is proposed that new living-in accommodation for recruit trainees at
RAAF Base Wagga and officer cadets at RAAF Base East Sale would be provided in
accordance with Defence standards.[12] The Committee sought
further information as to the specifications of these standards. Defence
explained that recruit training accommodation comprised quadruple occupancy
rooms measuring about 36 square metres, while officer trainees would have
single rooms and shared ablutions. Due to the tight schedule under which
recruits operate, ablutions will be provided at a ratio of one shower per four
recruits.[13]
Messing Arrangements
3.10
Defence intends to construct a new combined all-ranks mess at RAAF Base
East Sale, while RAAF Base Wagga will retain separate messing facilities for
officers, sergeants and airmen.[14] Defence reported that
the consolidation of three messes into one at RAAF Base East Sale will produce
annual cost savings in the order of $1 million. In view of the demonstrable
cost effectiveness of combined messing, the Committee was interested to know
why a similar arrangement would not be pursued at RAAF Base Wagga. Defence
explained that combined messing was being investigated at a number of bases,
but a comparison of capital costs versus whole-of-life costs had revealed that
it would not be the most economic or efficient option for RAAF Base Wagga.[15]
Traffic Management
3.11
Considering the magnitude of the expected population increases at RAAF
Bases Wagga and East Sale, the Committee wished to ensure that due
consideration had been given to traffic management and parking issues. Defence
replied that it had considered these issues in terms of both future personnel
numbers and construction traffic and was confident that the wide roads at the
bases had ample capacity for additional on-street parking, while management
solutions would be put in place to manage peak construction traffic.[16]
Occupational Health and Safety
3.12
The inadequacy of current training facilities and accommodation at RAAF
Base Edinburgh and Point Cook Base in respect of amenity and OH&S was cited
by Defence as a primary motivator for the proposed relocation project.[17]
At the public hearing, the Committee asked Defence to elaborate on the specific
nature of the current OH& S deficiencies. In response, Defence explained
that the officer training infrastructure at Point Cook had not been built for
its current purpose and has exceeded its economic life, while the demountables
and World War II-vintage warehouses occupied by recruits at Point Cook
represent the worst accommodation in the Air Force. Defence added that kitchen
facilities at RAAF Base Wagga were also urgently in need of an upgrade.[18]
Defence was able to assure the Committee that, despite these shortcomings, the
OH&S situation on each base continued to be closely regulated and there had
been no safety incidents.[19]
Demolition Works
3.13
Defence submitted that, following the proposed relocation, a number of
facilities at RAAF Base Edinburgh would become surplus to requirements and may
be demolished, pending the results of a comprehensive heritage study and an
asbestos survey. Should asbestos be discovered in any buildings identified for
demolition, Defence intends to engage a suitably qualified removal contractor.[20]
The confidential project cost estimate supplied to the Committee included
separate figures for the demolition works at RAAF Base Edinburgh and the
removal of asbestos at RAAF Bases Wagga and Sale.
3.14
At the public hearing, the Committee asked if Defence had established
the number and condition of the buildings to be demolished at RAAF Base
Edinburgh; whether Defence had determined the amount of hazardous materials to
be removed from each base; and what impact the results of these investigations
may have upon the project budget.
3.15
Defence reported that comprehensive asbestos registers are maintained
for both RAAF Base Wagga and RAAF Base Sale, and it is anticipated that both
sites will be asbestos-free by 2007. Defence was unable to provide a figure
for the number of buildings to be demolished at RAAF Base Edinburgh as the
heritage survey has not been completed and it is expected that a sample of each
building type will need to be retained for heritage purposes.
3.16
The Committee expressed concern that the uncertainty surrounding the
scope of the demolition works may lead to unforseen costs. Defence assured the
Committee that the allocated demolition budget would be sufficient, as it had
been calculated on the basis of full demolition of all redundant facilities.
The Committee requested that Defence supply it with a comprehensive list of all
buildings to be demolished at RAAF Base Edinburgh, and associated costs, as
soon as the information becomes available.
Recommendation 1 |
|
The Committee recommends that the Department of Defence
supply it with a comprehensive list of all buildings to be demolished at RAAF
Base Edinburgh, together with all associated demolition and asbestos removal
costs, as soon as practicable following completion of the necessary surveys.
|
Consultation
3.17
Defence’s main submission included a list of 64 authorities with who
Defence has consulted or intends to consult in respect of the proposed works.
The Committee requested that Defence provide it with an update of the status of
consultation undertaken to date, with both government bodies and the wider
community. Defence explained that public consultative meetings had been
conducted in both Wagga Wagga and Sale in April and September 2004. These
meetings had generated considerable community interest and were well-attended.
In addition, Defence furnished the Committee with a list of organisations that
it had nominated to be invited to make a submission to the inquiry, and two
sets of fact sheets relating to proposed forward community consultation and
consultation conducted in respect of Indigenous heritage.[21]
3.18
During their inspection of RAAF Base Wagga, Committee members observed
that some of the proposed new 1RTU outdoor training facilities, including the
dry-firing area, were very close to private homes. Members wished to know what
consultation had been undertaken with the neighbouring home-owners. Defence
replied that specific consultation with landowners would commence subject to
parliamentary approval of the proposal. The erection of an acoustic barrier
between the facility and the adjoining properties is also planned.[22]
Community Impacts
3.19
The inquiry into the RAAF College relocation project generated 14
submissions from organisations and individuals in Wagga Wagga and Sale, all of
which were strongly supportive of the proposed works. At the public hearings,
the Committee was pleased to hear further evidence from Mrs Kay Hull MP, Member
for Riverina; the Wellington Shire Council and the Rotary Club of Sale,
attesting that the works would be enthusiastically welcomed by the respective
local communities.
Economic Impacts
3.20
Submissions received from both Wagga Wagga and Sale emphasised the
economic benefits expected to be derived from the project.[23]
An analysis undertaken by the Wellington Shire Council, for example, estimated
that the relocation would add some $7.44 million to the local economy,
including over 60 additional jobs[24] , while Mrs Kay Hull MP
stated that the proposal would
…provide a significant boost to the economy through greater
confidence in our future viability.[25]
3.21
In view of the enthusiasm with which the communities of Wagga Wagga and
Sale had greeted the proposal, the Committee wished to confirm that the works
would provide opportunities for local businesses. Defence stated that forms
upon which businesses could register interest in the works packages had been
distributed at public meetings held in Wagga Wagga and Sale, and advertisements
had been placed in local newspapers. Defence anticipates that while some local
firms may not have the capacity to take on a total works package, they could
certainly undertake partial packages. Defence added that local businesses had
some competitive advantage as they did not incur additional accommodation and
transport costs.[26]
3.22
The Wellington Shire Council stated that it was pleased with the work
undertaken by Defence in respect of providing opportunities for local
businesses and confirmed that public meetings about the project had been very
well-attended. The Council added that, while the local community may not be
able to provide a prime contractor, local tradespeople had in the past
successfully participated in a prison construction project valued at over $80
million.[27]
Social Impacts
3.23
Submissions received by the Committee highlighted the social benefits of
the proposed RAAF College relocation for both the incoming Defence personnel
and the wider community. All submission confirmed the close and long-standing
ties between the communities of Wagga Wagga and Sale and Defence, and many
stressed the lifestyle advantages of these regional centres. All public
submissions were unanimous in their appreciation of the role played by Defence
personnel in the wider community and the much-needed boost that the additional
population would bring to the respective regions. The representative of the
Rotary Club of Sale expressed the view that the social importance of the RAAF
Base may outweigh its economic importance as it
…puts people into the community who start to set the
benchmarks and standards that we really need to grow in a social sense.[28]
Recommendation 2 |
|
The Committee recommends that the proposed works associated with
the relocation of selected RAAF College Units to RAAF Base East Sale,
Victoria and RAAF Base Wagga, New South Wales proceed at the estimated cost
of $133.4 million.
|
Hon Judi Moylan MP
Chair
2 November 2005