|
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Treaties
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Chapter 2 Measure 1 (2005) Annex VI to the
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty: Liability arising
from environmental emergencies (Stockholm, 17 June 2005)
Measure 4 (2004) Insurance and contingency planning for tourism and non-governmental
activities in the Antarctic Treaty area (Cape Town, 4 June 2004)
Measure 15 (2009) Landing of persons from passenger vessels in the
Antarctic Treaty area (Baltimore, 17 April 2009)
Introduction
2.1
On 5 July 2011, Measure 1 (2005) Annex VI to the Protocol on
Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty: Liability arising from
environmental emergencies (Stockholm, 17 June 2005); Measure 4 (2004)
Insurance and contingency planning for tourism and non-governmental activities
in the Antarctic Treaty area (Cape Town, 4 June 2004); and Measure 15
(2009) Landing of persons from passenger vessels in the Antarctic Treaty area
(Baltimore, 17 April 2009) were tabled in the Commonwealth Parliament.
2.2
This series of amendments reflects changes to the administration of the
Antarctic and its environment. All three measures apply to the 1961 Antarctic
Treaty and were adopted unanimously by the Consultative Parties at the 27th, 28th
and 32nd Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).[1]
2.3
Australia has been a Consultative Party to the Treaty since it came into
force on 23 June 1961. Twelve countries were original signatories to the
Antarctic Treaty in 1959. Of these, seven claim territory in Antarctica.
Thirty-six other countries have now become Parties to the Treaty by acceding,
for a total of 47 Parties.[2]
2.4
Consultative Parties are those Parties entitled to participate in
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. These are the original 12 signatories
to the Antarctic Treaty, and those that demonstrate their interest in
Antarctica by ‘conducting substantial research activity there’. Sixteen of the
acceding countries have had their activities in Antarctica recognised according
to this provision, and consequently there are 28 Consultative Parties as of
April 2011. The other 20 Non-Consultative Parties are invited to attend the
Consultative Meetings but do not participate in the decision-making.[3]
2.5
The Treaty is a multilateral agreement that:
n requires
the Contracting Parties to ensure that Antarctica is used exclusively for
peaceful purposes;
n guarantees
freedom of scientific research;
n promotes
international scientific cooperation;
n allows
for the inspection of facilities between Contracting Parties;
n sets
aside the question of territorial sovereignty in Antarctica; and
n provides
for regular meetings between the Contracting Parties.[4]
2.6
A large proportion of Antarctica is within Australia’s jurisdiction. Australia
also has an extensive research program in the Antarctic. Australia took a
leading role in the formation of the Treaty, and successive Australian
governments have viewed the implementation of the Treaty and associated
agreements as a high priority. Australia is a strong advocate for the Treaty
and has actively contributed to the development of the additional instruments
in the Treaty system, including the Protocol on Environmental Protection to
the Antarctic Treaty (1998).[5]
2.7
Government and non-government activities in Antarctica have increased
markedly over the past three decades.[6] For example, the number
of passengers landing by vessel in Antarctica increased from 6,704 in 1992-93
to 32,637 in 2007-08. The number of cruise-only vessel passengers increased
from 936 in 1999-00 to 15,026 in 2009-10.[7] Activities posing the
greatest risk to the Antarctic environment include the operation and resupply
of national Antarctic program stations and the operation of vessels.[8]
The Committee also notes the pressure imposed on the Antarctic environment by increased
tourist visitor numbers.
Aim of the treaties
Measure 1
2.8
The costs associated with a response to an environmental emergency in the
Antarctic are likely to be significant given the region’s distance from ports
and response facilities and difficult operating conditions.
2.9
As a result, Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (ATCP) agreed that in
order to minimise risk to the Antarctic environment, government and non-government
operators alike must be obliged to:
n undertake reasonable
preventative measures;
n establish contingency
plans;
n undertake prompt and
effective response action to environmental emergencies they cause; and
n compensate a Party
that responds to an environmental emergency in its stead. [9]
Measure 4
2.10
ATCPs agree that all operators planning to conduct activities in the
Antarctic must recognise and prepare adequately for the inherent dangers
associated with operations conducted in such an inhospitable and isolated
environment. The following aspects are of particular relevance:
n the health and safety
of individuals participating in activities;
n the health and safety
of rescuers and integrity of equipment used to undertake search and rescue
operations in the Antarctic;
n the significant costs
associated with the conduct of search and rescue, and medical care and
evacuation operations in the Antarctic;
n the potential for
disruption to national Antarctic programs (particularly scientific research
activities) due to unplanned diversions of critical and limited resources to
conduct search and rescue, medical care and evacuation operations; and
n the lack of a right
to compensation for costs under existing arrangements where ATCPs provide
assistance to vessels and aircraft in distress. [10]
2.11
In addition, contingency plans and arrangements must be in place prior
to activities commencing and such plans cannot be reliant upon support from
other operators or national programs unless prior agreement has been reached.[11]
2.12
Prior to the introduction of Measure 4, a non-obligatory system of
self-regulation had been in place. In 1994, the 18th
ATCM adopted a non-obligatory Recommendation XVIII-1 Tourism and
non-governmental activities that recommends operators:
n ensure that
activities are self-sufficient and do not require assistance from ATCPs unless
such arrangements for assistance have been agreed in advance;
n provide information
to assist in the preparation of contingency plans for emergency situations
including search and rescue, medical care and evacuation; and
n consider insurance.[12]
2.13
In 2004, the 27th ATCM adopted Resolution 4 (2004)
Guidelines on contingency planning, insurance and other matters for tourist and
other non-governmental activities in the Antarctic Treaty area that
recommends operators organising or conducting tourist or other non-governmental
activities in the Antarctic:
n ensure that appropriate
contingency plans and sufficient arrangements for health and safety, search and
rescue, medical care and evacuation have been drawn-up and are in place prior
to the start of the activity;
n ensure that such
plans and arrangements are not reliant on support from other operators or
national Antarctic programs without their express written agreement; and
n ensure that adequate
insurance or other arrangements are in place to cover any costs associated with
search and rescue, medical care and evacuation. [13]
2.14
Resolution 4 (2004) is intended as an interim arrangement during the
implementation period for Measure 4 (2004).[14]
Measure 15
2.15
This Measure places restrictions on certain tourist or other
non-governmental activities activities in the Antarctic in the Treaty area. The
Contracting Parties are obliged to impose requirements on their authorised
operators. The new requirements will mean that, for vessels carrying more than
500 passengers, operators must refrain from making any landings in the Antarctic.
For vessels carrying 500 or fewer passengers, operators must:
n coordinate
with each other with the objective that no more than one tourist vessel is at
any landing site at any one time;
n ensure
that no more than 100 passengers are ashore at any one time; and
n maintain
a 1:20 guide-to-passenger ratio ashore. [15]
2.16
The Measure also provides that these requirements may be subject to
further adjustment by the Consultative Parties at future sessions of the ATCM.[16]
2.17
This Measure is a recognition by the ATCPs that vessel-borne tourism
operations in the Antarctic have expanded markedly over the past two decades.
Australians constitute a large proportion of consumers within the Antarctic
tourism markets, representing approximately 9 per cent of Antarctic tourists. [17]
Australia’s interest in accepting the measures
2.18
In all three cases, the Australian Government has strategic and policy
interests in Antarctica and their implementation would directly contribute to:
n the maintenance of
the Antarctic Treaty system and enhancement of Australia’s standing and
influence within it; and
n the protection of the
Antarctic environment.
2.19
Furthermore, Australia must participate proactively within the
governance institutions of the Antarctic Treaty system to enhance its influence
and advance its Antarctic interests. Because Measures adopted by the ATCM do
not enter into force until they are implemented by all ATCPs, taking the
necessary domestic actions in a timely manner is crucial to Australia’s
maintenance of influence within the Antarctic Treaty system.[18]
International approval
2.20
The Committee notes the status of these agreements. Each Measure will
only come into force when all 28 consultative party members have approved them.
To date, five have approved Measure 1, ten have approved Measure 4 and only one
– Japan – has approved Measure 15.[19] Thus, Australia is not
yet bound by any of the amendments, and will only be bound when all other
members have approved.
2.21
Nonetheless, this does not mean that the members are neglecting their
responsibilities. The Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water,
Population and Communities explained:
...there is a strong commitment among the parties to see
these things move into force. The intention, then, is for each party to take
these things forward. Australia is in the leading part of the parties seeking
to adopt these measures, but each party, particularly in relation to Measure 1,
2005, looks at its national domestic legislative processes and teases out the
aspects of the liability convention in terms of its implementation...
One other thing that I will mention is that, in the margins
of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, the consultative parties sit down
and discuss implementation of measures as a routine matter of business and
share information and get an understanding and appreciation of how to implement
these. As well, the parties that have implemented these measures have release
copies of the legislation they have used, as well as the other materials that
support the legislation.[20]
Costs
2.22
There are no foreseeable financial costs to the Commonwealth ofAustralia
associated with compliance with the proposed treaty action.[21]
The Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and
Communities indicted that whatever departmental costs are incurred, they will
be within normal operating activities.[22] In terms of Measure 1, Australia
has in place procedures to promptly and effectively respond to environmental
emergencies arising from its national program activities in the Antarctic.[23]
2.23
With respect to the tourist industry, the Department of Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Population and Communities also indicted that those tourist
operators affected by the amendments were already voluntarily abiding by its
provisions and were unlikely to incur further costs when the Measures come into
effect.
Tourism operators go to inordinate lengths to maintain the
pristine nature of Antarctica. So as an initiative the tourism operators have
worked together to form the International Association of Antarctica Tour
Operators and through that they have arranged a number of self-regulatory
mechanisms that have then moved on to become regulatory mechanisms under the
Antarctic Treaty. So in this context measure 4 and measure 15 derive from the
work of the tourism industry itself and are moving through a resolution process
from applying on a voluntary basis to now a regulatory process where they will
apply an obligatory process.[24]
Conclusion
2.24
The Committee recognises the importance of the proposed amendments and supports
their approval.
2.25
The three separate Measures contribute to the protection of the
Antarctic environment and, given Australia’s strategic and policy interests in
Antarctica, their implementation would directly contribute to the maintenance
of the Antarctic Treaty system and enhancement of Australia’s standing and
influence within it.
2.26
The Commonwealth Government is not expected to incur any costs – those
costs that are expected will be absorbed within normal operating activities –
and tourist and non-government operators are, to a large degree, already
applying the necessary measures to their operations.
2.27
This confluence of interests and circumstances draws the Committee
towards the conclusion that these amendments should be supported with binding
treaty action.
Recommendation 1 |
|
The Committee supports Measure 1 (2005) Annex VI to the
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty: Liability
arising from environmental emergencies (Stockholm, 17 June 2005) and
recommends that binding treaty action be taken. |
Recommendation 2 |
|
The Committee supports Measure 4 (2004) Insurance and
contingency planning for tourism and non-governmental activities in the
Antarctic Treaty area (Cape Town, 4 June 2004) and recommends that
binding treaty action be taken. |
Recommendation 3 |
|
The Committee supports Measure 15 (2009) Landing of
persons from passenger vessels in the Antarctic Treaty area (Baltimore, 17
April 2009) and recommends that binding treaty action be taken. |
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Back to top