Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1
This chapter provides a background to the inquiry and sets out the
current arrangements regarding tax deductibility for political donations. A
brief history of tax deductibility policy and some of the changes proposed and
implemented are presented. Arrangements in other selected jurisdictions are
also summarised.
Background to the inquiry
1.2
On 19 March 2008 the Senate referred Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws
Amendment (2008 Measures No. 1) Bill 2008 to the Joint Standing Committee on
Electoral Matters for an advisory report. The Senate resolution required the
committee to report by June 2009.[1]
1.3
The committee is also currently undertaking an inquiry into the 2007 federal
election and related matters, which was referred by the Special Minister of
State on 27 February 2008. A later reference from the Senate specifically
requested that the committee examine a range of matters relating to the
financing of political parties as part of the inquiry.[2]
No reporting date was specified in any of these references.
1.4
While the committee considered the option of including the review of
Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment Act (2008 Measures No. 1) Bill 2008
as part of its broader 2007 election inquiry, it was decided to conduct the
review separately and report to the Senate as soon as practicable.
1.5
The committee announced that it would commence the inquiry into Schedule
1 of the Tax Laws Amendment Act (2008 Measures No. 1) Bill 2008 on 28 March 2008 and an advertisement was placed in The Australian newspaper on 2 April 2008. Letters were sent to the major parties and academics with an interest in
political finance issues on the same day.
1.6
The committee received 10 submissions. A public hearing was
conducted on 29 April 2008. All organisations making submissions and the major
political parties were given the opportunity to appear at the public hearing.
1.7
Details of the submissions and the public hearing are listed in appendix
A and B respectively. Full copies of the submissions and public hearing
transcript can be found at the committee’s website:
http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=em/taxlawbill/index.htm.
1.8
This inquiry is being carried out during a period where there is
significant policy debate over the future shape of political party financing
more generally. Parliamentary inquiries into campaign financing in several
jurisdictions have been announced or are in the process of gathering evidence.[3]
Further, the federal government has also announced a program of legislative
reform and the initiation of a green paper process to consider broader reforms
to political funding and disclosure.[4]
1.9
Tax deductibility can be seen as part of the overall framework of
political party financing. Alternatively, it can be viewed in isolation of
other mechanisms. The committee looks more closely at some of the potential
links with other aspects of political party financing in chapter 2.
Current arrangements
1.10
Individual taxpayers and businesses can currently claim a tax deduction
for political contributions and gifts when they complete their tax returns at
the end of a financial year.
1.11
Contributions and gifts to political parties include payments for political
party membership fees and donations. The Treasury explained that:
A gift has common-law meaning in general. Basically, a gift
is where generally there is no expectation of or wanting something in return.
‘Contribution’ again is an undefined term, so we use its common meaning, which
is an amount contributed to or added to the fund and those sorts of things.[5]
1.12
There are two methods under which political contributions and gifts to
political parties and can be claimed as a tax deduction:
n a general deduction
to taxpayers for expenses that are incurred in gaining or
producing assessable income. There is no limit applied to the general
deduction and it applies to individual taxpayers and businesses;[6]
and
n a specific deduction
for certain contributions and gifts to registered political parties,
independent candidates and members. Contributions and gifts must be at least $2
and there is a limit of $1500 on the total amount deductible in an income year.
The specific deduction is available to both individual taxpayers and
businesses.[7]
1.13
In the case of the specific deduction, the deductibility limit applies
separately to political parties and independent candidates, allowing taxpayers
to claim up to $3,000 per income year. Guidelines produced by the
Australian Taxation Office provide the following example:
During the 2006-07 income year, John contributes $500 and $1500 respectively
to two registered political parties. He also gifts $200, $600 and
$1,100 respectively to two independent candidates and one independent
member.
John may claim a tax deduction of $3,000 in his 2006-07
tax return:
n $1500 in
relation to the $2,000 contributed to political parties; and
n $1500 in
relation to the $1,900 gifted to the independent candidates and the
independent member.[8]
1.14
The availability of the specific deduction to individual taxpayers and
businesses also means that some taxpayers are able to ‘double dip’. For
example, a small business operator may make a contribution or gift to a
political party of $1500 as an individual and $1500 as a business and
claim a tax deduction for each amount.[9]
1.15
The underlying tax principle regarding the general deduction is based on
a relationship between expenses incurred by a taxpayer and their taxable earnings.
The Treasury explained that:
it is a general concept that, where a person incurs
expenditure in the course of gaining and producing their assessable income,
those expenditures are deductible, which is the general tenet of section 8.1 of
the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. … Where those expenses are incurred in
gaining and producing the assessable income that that person derives, then the
general tenet of taxation policy is that those deductions should be allowable.[10]
1.16
While this underlying principle around the general deduction appears to
be relatively straightforward, assessing the link between earning assessable
income and any contributions to political parties, members and independent
candidates can be complex.
1.17
The following examples, drawn from guidelines and advice provided by the
Australian Taxation Office and The Treasury, illustrate this complexity in
practice in relation to direct and indirect contributions to political parties:
n Contributions and
gifts that involve entertainment, access to politicians and/or meals — The
components relating to meals and entertainment are typically not deductible and
the amount over and above these items may be considered as a donation;[11]
n Payments for goods
and services by a business to a political party at above commercial rates — The
component relating to the commercial value of the good or service would
generally be deductible as a business expense. Any component above the market
value would be deductible within the current ceiling of $1500 per annum for
contributions and gifts.[12]
n Union membership and
levies — Periodic subscriptions paid by a person for membership of a trade,
business or professional association are deductible where the principal
activities of the trade, business or professional association are relevant to
the gaining or producing of assessable income by the member, or the carrying on
of a business by the member for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable
income. However, the following levies, which may be imposed by associations
from time to time are not tax deductible:
§
payments to, or to assist, a political party
§
payments to provide overseas relief
§
payments to assist families of employees suffering financial
difficulties as a result of employees being on strike or having been laid off
by their employers
§
payments by salaried elected trade union officials into a general
fund for the election of union officials.[13]
1.18
While the Australian Taxation Office provides advice to business and
individual taxpayers on the deductibility of contributions and gifts to
political parties in the form of guidelines and taxation rulings, a definitive
interpretation for each taxpayer may require a case by case examination of
individual transactions.
1.19
When taxpayers complete their tax returns, amounts paid to registered
political parties, members and independent candidates need to be claimed under
the general deduction (as with other expenses) or under the specific deduction:
n If amounts are
claimed as a general deduction, they are included as work-related expenses (for
individuals) or an expense (for businesses) on the taxpayer’s tax return form.
There is no cap on the general deduction;
n If amounts are
claimed under the specific deduction, they are included in the ‘Gifts and
Donations’ category on the taxpayer’s tax return form. This category also
includes gifts and donations to eligible entities endorsed by the Australian
Tax Office or listed in the Income Tax Assessment Act. A cap of $1500 applies
to the specific deduction.
1.20
The aggregation of contributions and gifts to political parties within
broader categories of expenses or donations in tax returns means that there is
no administrative data available to determine how many taxpayers claim a
deduction, how much they contribute or other characteristics such as their age,
gender and postcode. Estimates of the overall cost of the deduction (in terms
of potential revenue foregone) are based on other information (see
chapter 2).
Background to existing arrangements
1.21
Tax deductibility for expenses related to the earning of assessable
income has been a long-standing principle of income tax arrangements, with
personal taxpayers able to claim deductions for work-related expenses since
1915.[14] While the tax law explicitly
mentions some types of payments for which a deduction cannot be claimed —
including bribes to public officials, expenditure relating to illegal
activities and recreational club membership expenses[15]
— the general deductibility principle applies to those transactions that are
related to a taxpayer’s income generating activities.
1.22
Specific deductibility for a range of causes and organisations, albeit
on a more limited scale, has also been part of commonwealth income tax law
since 1915.[16] Current tax law provides
that donations to more than 15,000 specified organisations across a range of
groups including social, recreational, educational and cultural organisations are
tax deductible.[17]
1.23
Specific deductibility for contributions and gifts to political parties registered
under the Commonwealth Electoral Act was introduced in 1991 with significant
amendments made in 2006. The issue of tax deductibility for such contributions
has been examined by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters on a
number of occasions as part of its federal election and other inquiries.
1991 introduction of tax deductibility
1.24
Specific tax deductibility for donations and gifts to registered
political parties was first introduced in 1991 with the passage of the
Political Broadcasts and Political Disclosures Bill 1991.
1.25
Tax deductibility for donations to political parties was not part of the
original bill. After passing through the House of Representatives, the Senate
moved amendments to include tax deductibility for contributions to parties
registered under the Commonwealth Electoral Act of $2 or more (moved by the
coalition parties) with a further amendment setting a maximum allowable
deduction of $100 (moved by the Democrats).
1.26
These amendments in the Senate were made after consideration by a Senate
select committee. The committee’s report, which also canvassed a wide range of
issues included in the Bill such as political advertising, public funding for
elections and disclosure of donations, was largely divided along party lines
over the issue of tax deductibility for donations to political parties.
1.27
The majority report did not include any discussion or recommendations
about tax deductibility. The dissenting report by coalition members noted that:
The Majority Report – which is an expression only of the
Labor Party’s viewpoint – indicates that there is no real intent to level the
playing field or it would contain the essential recommendation that ALL
political donations be tax deductible.
While we recognise that this in itself will not level the
playing field as it relates to unions enjoying tax exempt status, it would
tackle one major component of the tax advantage discrepancy between the ALP and
other political parties and as such should have been a recommendation of the
Committee.[18]
1.28
The House of Representatives accepted the Senate amendments and the Bill was carried on 19 December 1991 and received royal assent on the same day. Taxpayers were
able to claim a deduction for donations made from 1 July 1991.[19]
1.29
A ruling by the Commissioner for Taxation in 1992 resolved uncertainty
over some of the terms used in the Bill by issuing a determination that:
n ‘contributions’
included membership subscriptions;
n ‘testamentary’
contributions and gifts, that is, those made under a will, were not deductible;
and
n a ‘contributor’
cannot be a company.[20]
1.30
The issue of tax deductibility for political donations had been
considered by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters on several
occasions prior to it being included in the (amended) Political Broadcasts and
Political Disclosures Bill 1991. A report by the committee in 1989 noted that:
The ALP submission claimed that additional funds raised by
political parties with tax deductibility advantage would alleviate any pressure
for increased levels of public funding, encourage political parties to continue
to seek direct support from the public, and help them more adequately fulfil
their necessary social functions. However, the Liberal Party submission
expressed the view that tax deductibility of political donations (with a
ceiling on deductible donations) is a preferable alternative to the existing
system of public funding but could not advocate that tax deductibility should
be an addition rather than an alternative to public funding.[21]
2006 amendments
1.31
There were no changes made to the tax deductibility provisions of
political contributions and gifts until 2006, when the government also made a number
of other changes to electoral law. Major changes to the tax deductibility
provisions introduced with the passage of the Electoral and Referendum
Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2005 included:
n lifting the threshold
for a tax deduction from $100 to $1500;
n allowing
deductibility for contributions made to political parties registered under
State and Territory electoral legislation;
n allowing
deductibility for contributions and gifts to members and independent
candidates; and
n extending
deductibility for contributions and gifts from companies.[22]
1.32
The cost of expanding the coverage of deductibility provisions and
increasing the threshold was estimated by the government to be
$4.9 million in 2007-08, $6.5 million in 2008-09, $5.4 million
in 2009-10 and $5.7 million in 2010-11.[23]
1.33
The Bill became law on 22 June 2006. For the financial year covering the
period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006, individual taxpayers were able to
claim a deduction of $100 for contributions and gifts to political parties
registered under the Commonwealth Electoral Act up to 21 June 2006. For the remaining 8 days of the financial year to 30 June 2006 individual taxpayers and businesses were able to claim contributions and gifts to a wider range
of political parties and candidates up to a maximum of $1500.
1.34
While these provisions were not passed by the parliament until 2006, the
government made several attempts to include some of the measures in 1998 and
1999.[24] In both cases however,
the Bill passed the House of Representatives but lapsed in the Senate.[25]
1.35
The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters considered the issue
of tax deductibility on numerous occasions in the period between the
introduction of tax deductibility in 1992 and the 2006 amendments as part of
its reports on federal elections and other inquiries.
1.36
The committee’s report on the 1996 election included a recommendation
that the tax deductibility threshold be lifted to $1500 and that donations from
corporations also be tax deductible. In its submission to the inquiry, the
Liberal Party of Australia considered that the tax deductibility threshold
should be lifted to $10,000 while the Australian Labor Party had nominated an
increase to $1500. A recommendation expanding tax deductibility for donations
to independent candidates was also included.[26]
1.37
While the Liberal Party of Australia’s submission to the 1998 election
inquiry again supported lifting the threshold to $10,000, the committee
considered that an increase from $100 was not necessary at the time.[27]
1.38
The committee’s report on the 2004 election recommended that the tax
deductibility threshold should be lifted to $2000 and adjusted annually for
inflation. In its submission, the Liberal Party of Australia argued for a
‘significant increase’ on the $100 limit, the Nationals supported an
increase and the Australian Labor Party (ALP) opposed any increase.[28]
The minority report from the four ALP members noted that:
The Majority recommendation that tax deductibility for
political donations be raised from $100 to $2000 is an unjustified attempt to
transfer private political donations into a taxpayer subsidy. The [ALP] supports
public funding for the electoral process which is transparent and reflects the
votes gained by political parties. We believe that a general tax-deductibility
clause as outlined by the Majority will encourage individuals and other
entities to make extensive political contributions, in secret, and at taxpayer
expense. The potential to undermine the integrity of the political process
under these changes is clear.[29]
1.39
The most recent inquiry by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral
Matters to consider tax deductibility was its inquiry into disclosure of
donations to political parties. A report for the inquiry was tabled in February
2006. A bill lifting the tax deductibility threshold to $1500 and broadening deductibility
to companies and independent candidates was before the parliament at the time.[30]
1.40
The committee’s report did not include any specific recommendations on
tax deductibility, noting that the committee ‘did not find the need to add to
the recommendations that it made in its report on the 2004 election’.[31]
The Labor members of the committee dissented from the majority report, noting
that the ALP platform, as amended at the January 2004 Conference is that ‘Labor
will abolish the tax deductibility of political donations’.[32]
Changes proposed by the bill
1.41
The policy of removing tax deductibility for political donations was
first announced by the Hon Kim Beazley on 3 October 2006 and was included as part of a plan to save $3 billion from the federal budget released by
the Hon Lindsay Tanner on 2 March 2007.[33]
1.42
The policy was initially adopted by the Australian Labor Party in its
National Platform and Constitution in 2004.[34] The policy to abolish
the tax deductibility of political donations was also included as part of the
National Platform and Constitution in April 2007.[35]
1.43
The overall purpose of Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment (2008
Measures No. 1) Bill 2008 is to remove tax deductibility for contributions and
gifts to political parties, members and candidates.[36]
1.44
Introducing the Bill in the House of Representatives, the Assistant
Treasurer, the Hon Chris Bowen MP noted that:
this government is honouring its election commitment to
remove tax deductibility for donations made to political parties, candidates
and members. This commitment was made as part of ‘Labor’s $3 Billion Savings
Plan’, which was announced … on 2 March 2007.[37]
1.45
The government expects that removing tax deductibility for contributions
and gifts to political parties, members and candidates will save $31.4 million
over the four years to 2011-12, with savings commencing in 2009-10. The costing
methodology for the policy is discussed in chapter 2.
1.46
Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment Act (2008 Measures No. 1) Bill 2008
proposes several amendments to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 and the
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.
1.47
The proposed amendments remove the ability of all taxpayers — individual
taxpayers and business taxpayers — to claim specific deductions for
contributions and gifts to registered political parties or independent
candidates and members.
1.48
The proposed amendments also remove the general deduction available to
businesses for donations to political parties, members and independent
candidates. The amendments also preclude such contributions and gifts from
forming part of the cost base or reduced cost base of any capital gains tax
asset.
1.49
Individual taxpayers will be able to continue their current practice of
claiming contributions and gifts to political parties, members and independent
candidates as a tax deduction where it relates to earning their taxable income.
1.50
The Bill proposes that these arrangements would apply from the day on
which the Bill receives the Royal Assent. If the Bill is passed and given royal
assent before 30 June 2008 then these measures would apply to contributions
and gifts made on or after 1 July 2008. This would allow the arrangements to
apply for the full financial year 2008-09 which is the normal taxation period
for most taxpayers.
Structure of the bill
1.51
The most substantive elements of Schedule 1 of the Tax Laws Amendment
Bill (2008 Measures No. 1) are found in clauses 3 and 9. The remaining changes
proposed by the Bill are largely consequential in nature.
1.52
Clause 9 of the Bill proposes to repeal the part of the Income Tax Assessment
Act 1997 (subdivision 30DA) that currently includes the specific provisions for
political donations. This is the main element of the Bill, with the remaining
parts included to: allow the continuation of deductibility for individual
taxpayers under the general deduction provision; prevent businesses claiming
political donations under the general deduction provision; and amend the
capital gains tax provisions to ensure that such expenses do not form part of
the cost base or reduced cost base for capital gains purposes.
1.53
Clause 3 of the Bill proposes that a new section be inserted in
Division 26 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. This division of the
Act sets out some amounts that are not deductible, or that are not deductible in
full. Examples of payments covered in this section of the Act include amounts
payable by way of a penalty under Australian or foreign law, bribes to foreign
public officials and expenditure relating to illegal activities.[38]
1.54
Clause 3(1) of the Bill, reproduced below, inserts a new section into Division
26 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, that removes the ability of taxpayers
to claim as a general deduction political contributions and gifts (including a
membership fee):
You
cannot deduct political contributions or gifts
(1)
You cannot deduct under this Act:
(a) a contribution (including a membership fee) or gift to
a political party that is registered under Part XI of the Commonwealth
Electoral Act 1918 or under corresponding State or Territory legislation;
or
(b)
a contribution or gift to an
individual when the individual is a candidate in an election for members of:
(i)
an *Australian legislature; or
(ii)
a *local governing body; or
(c)
a contribution or gift to an
individual who is a member of:
(i)
an Australian legislature; or
(ii)
a local governing body.
1.55
Clauses 3(3) and 3(4), reproduced below, relate to this clause 3(1), as
they define when an individual becomes a candidate or a member:
Starting
and stopping being a candidate
(3)
For the purposes of this section, an individual:
(a) starts being a candidate when the individual’s
intention to be or attempt to be a candidate for the election is publicly
available; and
(b) stops being a candidate at the earlier of:
(i)
the time when the result of the
election is declared or otherwise publicly announced by an entity (an
electoral official) authorised under the relevant electoral legislation;
and
(ii)
the time (if any) when the
individual’s intention to no longer be a candidate for the election is publicly
available.
Starting
being a member
(4) An
individual who becomes a member as a result of an election (including an
election that is later declared void) is taken to start being a member when the
individual’s election as a member is declared or otherwise publicly announced
by an electoral official.
1.56
Clauses 3(2) of the Bill inserts provisions in the same section of the
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 that provides an exception to non-deductibility
for individual taxpayers — defined in the tax law as employees or office
holders — thereby allowing individual taxpayers to continue to claim a general
deduction for contributions and gifts to political parties:
Exception
for employees and office holders
(2) However,
subsection (1) does not apply to a loss or outgoing incurred in gaining or
producing assessable income from which an amount is required to be withheld
under section 12-35 or 12-45 in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration
Act 1953.
Note: The
provisions of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 require amounts to be
withheld from income of employees and office holders.
1.57
By implication, the lack of an exemption given to business taxpayers in
clause 3(2) provides for the discontinuation of the general deduction for donations
to political parties, members and independent candidates by business taxpayers
that are not part of normal commercial transactions.
1.58
The interpretation of what is considered a normal commercial transaction
is complex and will be determined by the Australian Taxation Office if the Bill becomes law. The Australian Taxation Office advised the committee that:
It is difficult to give you a definitive answer until we see
the final shape of the legislation from an interpretive point of view. In the
hypothetical context of a lobbying enterprise being involved in political
luncheons, if the tax office had sufficient concern that in fact this was
really fundraising and donation work as opposed to legitimate business
activity—and that is a terribly fraught interpretive space—we would possibly
pursue some questions about the deductibility of some aspects of those expenses.
But it is very difficult to answer a hypothetical question on legislation that
is not in place.[39]
1.59
The capital gains tax provisions are also amended so that such expenses prevented
from being deducted by the new section 26-22 do not form part of the cost base
or reduced cost base for capital gains tax purposes. This ensures that no
capital loss or reduced capital gain can arise from such contributions and
gifts.[40] These would be added to
a range of existing exclusions including bribes and penalties.[41]
Examples of changed arrangements
1.60
The Explanatory Memorandum prepared for the Bill includes several
examples to demonstrate the impact of the proposed amendments on different
types of taxpayers for a range of contributions and gifts (table 1.1).
Table 1.1 Impact of proposed amendments on selected
taxpayers and contributions and gifts
Taxpayer type
|
Example
|
Individual
|
Mary wishes to support a
registered political party, and consequently makes a $1,000 gift to the
party. The gift is not deductible.
|
Individual
|
Bob earns his income by
being employed as an engineer and is a member of a political party for which
he pays $50 a year in membership fees. The membership payment is not incurred
in earning his assessable income, and is therefore not deductible.
|
Individual
|
A Member of Parliament pays
a compulsory levy to retain their party membership. This would generally be
deductible.
|
Individual
|
A Member of Parliament pays
for a ticket to attend a fundraising event hosted by their party where a
substantial sit-down dinner is provided. The ticket price generally would not
be deductible.
|
Business
|
XYZ Ltd is a proof reading
company specialising in political publications. XYZ Ltd is looking to
maintain its corporate profile, and to this end makes contributions to
political parties. This amendment ensures that XYZ Ltd is unable to claim
these contributions as a loss or outgoing necessarily incurred in carrying on
its business or for the purpose of gaining or producing its assessable
income.
|
Source Explanatory
Memorandum, Tax Laws Amendment (2008 Measures No. 1) Bill 2008, pp. 8–9.
1.61
The Treasury noted the types of individual taxpayers that were likely to
be able to continue to claim membership of a political party as a general
deduction for income tax purposes would include members of parliament, the
staff of members of parliament and party employees.[42]
International practice
1.62
The use of a tax concession to provide an incentive for taxpayers to
contribute to political parties is a feature of some western democracies,
including the United States, Canada, Italy and the United Kingdom.[43]
1.63
The type of tax concession varies across countries and can include
mechanisms such as tax check offs, tax credits and deductions at source. The
choice of which system to use is partly related to the administrative aspects
of a country’s tax system including whether they require taxpayers to complete
annual tax returns.[44]
1.64
Several inquiry participants referred to the use of tax credits in Canada, where individual and corporate taxpayers receive a tax credit for monetary
contributions to political parties based on a sliding scale (table 1.2).[45]
Table 1.2 Canadian political contribution tax credit
Amount of contribution
|
Tax credit
|
C$0 to C$400
|
75 per cent of contribution. For example, C$150 credit for
$200 contribution.
|
C$401 to C$750
|
C$300 + 50 per cent of amount of contribution exceeding C$400.
For example, C$400 credit for C$600 contribution.
|
Over C$750
|
C$475 + 331/3 per cent of amount of contribution
over C$750 or C$650, whichever is the lesser amount. For example, C$650
credit for C$1,000 contribution.
|
Source Sempill S and Tham J, submission 9, p. 3.
1.65
Some of the arguments raised in favour of using tax concessions in a
1998 review in the United Kingdom included:
n That it provides an
incentive to political parties to attract a larger number of small donations
and therefore broaden political parties’ funding base; and
n That it also offers an
incentive to individuals to get involved in politics by contributing to the
democratic process. This incentive, it is also argued, may encourage a more
active participation in political parties generally.
1.66
Some of the arguments against the use of tax relief included:
n That it discriminates
between income tax payers and non-taxpayers because a donation by a taxpayer
facing a higher marginal tax rate can donate at less net cost to themselves
compared to those on lower marginal rates or non-taxpayers;
n Tax relief favours
parties whose members have higher incomes and can therefore afford larger
donations;
n There is an
opportunity cost involved in tax concessions whereby the tax which is recovered
by political parties represents public money denied elsewhere. Therefore,
although individuals using the tax concession scheme are exercising choice, all
other individuals would be forced to suffer the consequences of a reduction in
the sum total of public revenue; and
n The extension of
charitable-type tax relief to political parties could lead to increased
pressure for similar tax treatment for non-profit organisations that do not
currently qualify for tax relief on their donations because their objects are
regarded as ‘political’ and therefore not exclusively charitable.[46]
1.67
These arguments were re-examined in another review in the United Kingdom in 2004. In this review, a submission to the Electoral Commission noted that
poorer supporters of political parties would be disadvantaged, since the scheme
would only apply to taxpayers:
It is a form of political participation which is not
available to citizens on an equal basis, and it is a form of public funding of
the parties which discriminates between parties according to the bank balance
of their members and supporters rather than the depth or breadth of their
electoral support.[47]
1.68
Nevertheless, the Commission did not believe that the denial of a concession
to non-taxpayers’ donations was a good reason for not introducing such a
scheme. The Commission favoured the introduction of a tax concession scheme
that was limited to amounts of less than £200 (or the first £200 of larger
donations) and that tax relief should be given on membership subscriptions and
cash donations, but not on benefits-in-kind or on payments which involve a
potential benefit to the donor.[48] To improve fairness to
non-taxpayers, the Commission also considered that any tax relief scheme should
be extended to them, through a match-funding system.[49]
1.69
The use of tax concessions in other countries needs to take account of
cultural factors and other laws around party finance. For example, in Canada, corporate and union donations are now banned and donations from individuals are
capped at C$1100 to a party and its candidates.[50]
1.70
The practices and policies in other jurisdictions can offer some
guidance to policy makers in Australia. However, appropriate emphasis needs to
be placed on the relevant cultural factors, the administrative features of the tax
system and political factors that are features of political participation and
financing in Australia.