Key points
- The Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Amendment Bill 2022 seeks to implement the Albanese Government’s October 2022–23 Budget commitment to reform the Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme (DHOAS) by 1 January 2023.
- DHOAS reform was part of the Australian Labor Party’s Veterans policy commitment in the 2022 election.
- The Bill reduces the minimum qualifying service periods to access the DHOAS’s three subsidy tiers.
- The Bill also seeks to allow veterans and their families to access DHOAS any time after they have completed their service rather than within the current 5-year timeframe.
Introductory Info
Date introduced: 27 October 2022
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Defence
Commencement: 1 January 2023
Purpose and
structure of the Bill
The Defence
Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Amendment Bill 2022 (the Bill) seeks to amend
the Defence Home
Ownership Assistance Scheme Act 2008 (DHOAS Act) to expand the eligibility
criteria for the Defence Home Ownership
Assistance Scheme (DHOAS) as part of the Australian
Defence Force’s (ADF’s) recruitment and retention package.
The Bill’s only Schedule amends the DHOAS Act to:
- remove
the 5-year post-separation timeframe for accessing DHOAS
- reduce
the qualifying service period for Permanent, Reserve and foreign service members
to access DHOAS and the minimum effective service periods for each subsidy tier
- create
a power for the Secretary to declare that a subsidy payment ceasing event had
not occurred, such as when all outstanding amounts under the loan have been
paid but this was found to have occurred due to a genuine error, mistake or
accident and
- insert
a recoverable payments mechanism to address the potential risk of breaching ‘section
83 of the Constitution arising from payments purportedly made under the Act, in
good faith in the bona fide administration of the Act, but that are not
supported by the Act’.[1]
Background
The Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme was
established in 2008 by the DHOAS Act to replace its predecessor the Defence
HomeOwner Scheme (DHOS), which was set up in 1991. The DHOAS Act was,
in large part, a response to concerns about the ADF’s ability to recruit and
retain personnel.[2]
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) had conducted
audits into problems around the retention of ADF personnel in 2000 and a
follow-up audit in 2003. Both
audits noted the importance of ‘quality of life’ issues to the retention of ADF
members and the second asserted:
Expenditure on retention has the potential to be much more
cost effective than expenditure on recruitment and training.[3]
Problems with recruitment and retention continued through
2005 and, in May 2006, the Government initiated a review of the DHOS.[4]
On 31 May 2006 the Government introduced a Bill that amended the Defence Force (Home
Loans Assistance) Act 1990 extending the DHOS ‘finishing day’ by one
year (from 31 December 2006 to 31 December 2007) to allow enough time to complete
the review and make necessary changes.[5]
In response to this review, and as a part of the 2007
Budget measures focused on recruitment and retention, the Minister for Defence
announced that the DHOS would be replaced with a new scheme which would enhance
assistance by providing for higher benefits as members serve for longer periods
and would allow members to choose a mortgage provider (the old scheme had one
specified provider).[6]
The Defence Force
(Home Loans Assistance) Amendment Act 2007 provided for a further
extension of the DHOS to 30 June 2008 to allow time for the new Scheme to be
fully developed and implemented.[7]
However, relevant legislation had not been introduced when Parliament was
prorogued on 15 October 2007. The Rudd Government supported the idea and the
Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Bill 2008 was introduced and passed in
Parliament in June 2008.[8]
The DHOAS commenced on 1 July 2008.[9]
The Scheme is administered by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.[10]
In 2015 the ANAO conducted an audit of the DHOAS and found
that from mid-2008 to the end of 2014 more than 30,000 ADF members had accessed
the Scheme totalling $395 million in paid subsidies.[11]
Recent Defence annual reports show continued interest in the DHOAS with 6,123
applications processed and 3,602 subsidy payments made during 2020–21.[12]
ALP election
policy
The current Bill was foreshadowed in
the Australian Labor Party’s Veterans policy for the 2022 election.[13]
This stated that ‘Labor will boost home ownership for defence personnel and
veterans by expanding the eligibility criteria for the Defence Home Ownership
Assistance Scheme (DHOAS)’.[14]
Qualifying
time
The Bill reduces the qualifying time that a member must
have served in order to be eligible for the Scheme and, in turn, amends the period
of effective service needed to access each tier of the DHOAS.
Committee
consideration
Selection
of Bills Committee
At its meeting on 27 October 2022 the Senate Selection of
Bills Committee deferred consideration of the Bill until its next meeting.[15]
Senate
Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
At the time of writing, the Senate Standing Committee for
the Scrutiny of Bills had not yet commented on the Bill.
Policy
position of non-government parties/independents
The Leader of the Opposition, Peter Dutton, expressed
support for the Bill in his Budget in Reply speech on 27 October 2022:
The Coalition strongly supports the Government’s commitment
to expand the Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme.[16]
Position of
major interest groups
At the time of writing no major interest groups had
commented on the Bill.
Financial
implications
The October 2022–23 Budget included measures for expanding
access to the DHOAS noting the Government would provide $46.2 million over four
years from 2022–23 and approximately $17.8 million per year ongoing. The
cost of this measure will be met from within existing Defence resources.[17]
This is reflected in the Explanatory Memorandum, where the Bill is described as
having ‘moderate financial impact’.[18]
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
As required under Part 3 of the Human Rights
(Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (Cth), the Government has assessed
the Bill’s compatibility with the human rights and freedoms recognised or
declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of that Act. The
Government considers that the Bill is compatible.[19]
The Explanatory Memorandum indicates that the Bill advances
the right to an adequate standard of living and does not negatively impact any
human rights.[20]
Parliamentary
Joint Committee on Human Rights
At the time of writing the Parliamentary Joint Committee
on Human Rights had not yet commented on the Bill.
Key issues
and provisions
Amended time
frames
Part 2 of the DHOAS Act deals with the eligibility
criteria for access to the DHOAS including specified qualifying service
periods for Permanent, Reserve and foreign service members[21]
under section 8 and re-joining incapacitated members under section 10.
Items 1–3 of the Bill amend subsection 8(2) so
that:
- the
qualifying time period for a serving Member of the Permanent Forces is reduced from
four years to two years: amended paragraph 8(2)(a)
- the
qualifying time period for a Reserve member is reduced from eight years to four
years: amended paragraph 8(2)(b)
- the
qualifying time period for a foreign service member is reduced from four years
to two years: amended paragraph 8(2)(c).
Similarly, items 4 and 5 of the Bill amend subsection
10(2) to reduce the qualifying service period for Permanent rejoining
incapacitated members[22]
from four years to two years (amended paragraph 10(2)(a)) and for
Reservists from eight years to four years: amended paragraph 10(2)(b).
Item 12 repeals and replaces the table in
subsection 51(2) of the DHOAS Act to reflect these changes to
eligibility periods.
Subsidies
Existing sections 17 and 18 of the DHOAS Act deal
with the decision-making process for authorising a subsidy certificate to an eligible
applicant, including surviving partners of deceased members, in which a 5-year post-separation
limitation applies.[23]
Item 7 of the Bill repeals existing subsections 17(2)
and (3) relating to incapacitated members and separated members. Similarly, item
9 of the Bill repeals existing subsections 18(2) and (3) relating to surviving
partners. This effectively removes the five year limitation after leaving military
service to apply for a DHOAS subsidy.
Section 36 of the DHOAS Act sets out in table form
the events that cause a subsidy to cease and the time at which it might cease. In
particular, Table item 1 states that the subsidy stops being payable if ‘all
outstanding amounts due under the subsidised loan are paid’.
Item 11 of the Bill inserts proposed subsection 36(2)
into the DHOAS Act to allow the Secretary to
declare that an event covered by Table item 1 is deemed not to have occurred
where outstanding amounts were paid due to a genuine accident, error or
mistake. A refusal by the Secretary to make such a declaration may be subject
to internal review and then review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT):
proposed table item 6A in section 71, inserted by item 13 of the
Bill.
Section 83 of the Constitution
provides that the Government cannot spend money that has not been
appropriated by law. Section 84 of the DHOAS Act appropriates the
Consolidated Revenue Fund for payments of subsidy and taxes payable
in respect of payments of subsidy under the Act. This raises a risk that
payments that are intended to be made as subsidies (or taxes), but that do not
meet the requirements of the Act, are not supported by an appropriation and
therefore in breach of section 83 of the Constitution. This could occur,
for example, where a payment is made to a person who is not eligible to receive
a subsidy payment under the DHOAS Act. In that case the payment cannot
properly be characterised as a ‘payment of subsidy’ under the Act, and
therefore may not be authorised by section 84 of the DHOAS Act.
Item 14 of the Bill inserts proposed sections
84A and 84B into the DHOAS Act to address this risk. Proposed
section 84A provides the Commonwealth with authorisation to pay an amount which
the Act would not otherwise authorise, where the payment is purportedly the
payment of a subsidy (or taxes on a purported subsidy payment). Proposed
paragraphs 84A(c) and (d) provide that such payments are taken to be
payments of subsidy or taxes payable under the Act, for the purposes of section
84. Proposed paragraph 84A(e) provides that if such a payment is not an
overpaid amount, it is recoverable as a debt due to the Commonwealth and may be
recovered through legal action.[24]
Proposed section 84B requires the Secretary to
report on the payments covered by proposed section 84A (that is,
payments of subsidy and taxes that would not, absent section 84A, meet the
Act’s requirements). Specifically:
- Proposed
subsection 84B(1) stipulates the content to be reported, including the
number of relevant payments and the total amount of such payments.
- Proposed
subsection 84B(2) specifies the reporting period is a
financial year unless a shorter period is determined by the Minister.
- Proposed
subsection 84B(3) states that reports are not necessary where, to the
Secretary’s knowledge, no relevant payments have been made.
- Proposed
subsection 84B(4) requires reports to be published within four months after
the reporting period ends unless a shorter period is determined by the
Minister.
- Proposed
subsection 84B(5) allows the Minister, via legislative instrument, to make
determinations in relation to the reporting periods.
Application
and transition provisions
Part 2 of the Bill outlines the application of the
proposed amendments to the DHOAS Act should the Bill be enacted.
Item 15 states that the proposed amendments made to
sections 8 and 10 of the DHOAS Act (by items 1 to 5 of the
Bill) reducing the qualifying service periods for applicants, apply ‘whether
the person completed their qualifying service before, on or after the
commencement’ of the Bill. According to the Minister’s second reading speech,
from 1 January 2023 applications for subsidy certificates can be made under the
amended DHOAS by new applicants as well as veterans who previously had their
applications rejected under the former criteria.[25]
Additionally, existing DHOAS members who have not reached their maximum accrued
subsidy period are likely to receive an increase in their subsidy payments and service
credits.[26]
Item 16 permits a new application to be submitted
by a separated member who was previously refused a subsidy certificate. At
commencement of the proposed amendments, a previous application can be
disregarded if:
(a) it was made and
refused prior to commencement on 1 January 2023
(b) the applicant was not
a Defence Force member when the application was refused
(c) the applicant would
have been considered suitable to receive a subsidy certificate under the
proposed amendments.
Item 17 provides that the
amendments to section 17 that remove the 5-year post-separation timeframe (at item
7 of the Bill) apply in relation to an applicant who is not a member of the
Defence Force, whether they stopped being a member before, on or after the Bill
commences. Similarly, the amendments to section 18 (at item 9 of the
Bill) apply in relation to an applicant who is a surviving partner of a
deceased member, regardless of whether the deceased partner stopped being a
member or died before, on or after the Bill commences.
Item 18 provides that the power of the Secretary to
declare that a subsidised borrower had not paid all outstanding amounts due to
a genuine accident, error or mistake operates in relation to an event that
occurs on or after the commencement date.
Item 19 allows the loan limits for existing
borrowers to be adjusted in line with the proposed amendments after the
commencement on 1 January 2023.
Item 20 relates to the new reporting regime under proposed
section 84B and provides that it relates to a payment made under proposed
section 84A during a reporting period ends after the commencement. For
instance, the reporting period might be from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023. As 30
June 2023 is after the commencement date, any section 84A payment made during
that period should be included in the report—even though the start of the
reporting period was a date prior to the commencement date.