Chapter 5 Headquarters Agreement with the Secretariat to the Agreement on
the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels
Background
5.1
The Headquarters Agreement between the Government of Australia and
the Secretariat to the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels
sets out the conditions for Australia to host the permanent Secretariat to the Agreement
on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP). Australia has hosted the interim Secretariat, located in Hobart, since ACAP was signed in
2001.
5.2
ACAP was developed following the listing of all Southern Hemisphere
albatross species on the Appendices to the Convention on the Conservation of
Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) in 1997. The CMS compels member states to protect migratory species of wild animals that live within or pass
through their jurisdictional boundaries by concluding agreements to promote
conservation and management action and research relating to those species.[1]
5.3
There are 11 parties to ACAP: Argentina, Australia, Chile, Ecuador, France, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, South Africa, Spain and the United Kingdom. Brazil is a signatory to the Agreement and is expected to ratify in the
near future.[2]
Obligations
5.4
The key obligations of the Headquarters Agreement are:
n The Australian Government
shall arrange services for the Headquarters, including electricity, water,
sewerage, gas, mail, telephone, telegraph, drainage, collection of refuse and
fire protection (Article 5);
n The Secretariat will
have immunity from suit and other administrative or legal processes (Article 6)
and exemptions from all direct taxes (Article 9), customs and excise duties
(Article 10), and currency and exchange restrictions (Article 12);
n Publications and
other information material imported or exported within the scope of the
Secretariat’s official activities shall not be restricted in any way (Article
14);
n Representatives at
ACAP meetings, the Executive Secretary and staff members of the Secretariat and
experts, where not Australian citizens or permanent residents, shall receive
privileges and immunities (Articles 15, 16, 17 and 18); and
n The Australian
Government will facilitate the entry into, residence in, and departure from Australia, and freedom of movement in Australia, of the following persons: representatives
at ACAP meetings; Secretariat staff members, their spouses and dependant
children; and relevant experts (Article 19).
5.5
The immunities provided by this Agreement do not inhibit the Australian
Government from taking reasonable measures to preserve security and applying laws
necessary for health and quarantine or laws relating to public order (Article
21).
Reasons for Australia to take treaty action
5.6
ACAP has been an Australian-led initiative since 1997. Australia played a significant role in the development and finalisation of ACAP, is the
ACAP Depository, and has hosted the interim Secretariat since 2001.[3]
5.7
Successive Australian Governments have considered the conservation of
albatrosses and petrels to be a high priority. The Committee was informed that:
Australia pursued the development of ACAP due to the
threatened status of albatrosses and petrels globally. Nineteen of the world’s
22 species of albatrosses and both species of giant petrels are endangered …
Five of these breed in Australia and another 14 species forage in Australian
waters … these seabirds which breed within Australian waters are highly
susceptible to threats throughout their vast foraging range.[4]
It is tremendously important to us to use avenues,
particularly working in the regional fisheries management organisations, and
also bilaterally, to encourage other countries to take energetic conservation
action.[5]
5.8
Further, the Government considered that hosting the permanent
Secretariat would increase Australia’s standing in international affairs and accord
with its support for Hobart as an international Antarctic gateway city. It
would also provide logistical simplicity and greater continuity in not having
to move or interrupt the functioning of the interim Secretariat.[6]
Legal establishment of the Secretariat
5.9
The Committee received a submission that questioned the legal basis for
the establishment of the ACAP Secretariat.[7] It was argued that the
making of regulations under the International Organisations (Privileges and
Immunities) Act 1963 (the International Organisations Act) would not be
sufficient for Australia to comply with its obligations under the treaty and
that the Act itself requires amendment.[8]
5.10
The basis for this conclusion was:
n International
secretariats are rarely given legal personality because the treaty that creates
a secretariat usually also establishes a more appropriate body on which to
confer personality, namely an international organisation.[9]
n ACAP does not create
any international organisation within the sense of the International Organisations
Act. As there is no organisation, the Meeting of the Parties adopted a
resolution in 2006 giving personality to the Secretariat.
n An international
organisation can only have privileges and immunities conferred on it if Australia and at least one other country, or persons representing the same, are members.
The ACAP Secretariat by its very nature cannot have members in that sense.[10]
n There is no
obligation on any State that has acceded to ACAP since the Meeting of Parties
adopted the 2006 resolution to extend similar recognition to the Secretariat.[11]
5.11
When asked for their views on the submission, representatives of the
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Attorney-General’s Department
informed the Committee:
… we disagree with its conclusions … I think the suggestion
was made on the basis that the secretariat could not be declared an
international organisation for the purposes of the act. Our team of lawyers
examined the legislation and decided that the secretariat was an organ or a
part of a head organisation, which is identified in the ACAP treaty, called the
meeting of parties and that we would be able to designate the secretariat as an
organ of a head organisation that could be declared such an international
organisation for the purposes of the act.[12]
5.12
Further:
… section 5(1) of the privileges and immunities act … says:
(1) The regulations may declare an organisation:
(a) of which Australia and a country or countries
other than Australia are members …
… … …
to be an international organisation to which this Act applies.
So it is essentially up to the Commonwealth to declare, and
then the definition within 3(1), which makes it clear that a subsidiary part of
that organisation, such as the secretariat, can also have the privileges and
immunities. So once that is declared it basically also flows through to the
Migration Act, which picks it up as well. I guess the point is that the
domestic legislation is wide enough to give these organisations privileges and
immunities irrespective of their international status.[13]
Implementation
5.13
Office accommodation and other services for the Secretariat will be
provided by the Tasmanian Government pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding concluded
in 2007. The Committee understands that there is no cost to the Commonwealth
Government in relation to these services.[14]
5.14
Regulations will be required under the International Organisations
(Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 to bring the ACAP Secretariat within
the operation of that Act and ensure that the necessary privileges, immunities
and taxation concessions are extended to representatives at ACAP meetings, the
Executive Secretary and other staff and their family members, and relevant
experts.[15] This will also enable
the Department of Immigration and Citizenship to facilitate entry into,
residence in, and departure from Australia of persons listed in Article 19(a),
(b) and (c) of the Agreement.[16]
Costs
5.15
The Secretariat’s budget of $450,000 per annum is met by contributions
from each party. The Committee was told that this ‘modest’ budget means:
… that the taxation concessions will also be modest and more
than commensurate with the conservation and other benefits to be gained by Australia from the future success of ACAP.[17]
5.16
The Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts has
committed to meeting the cost of taxation concessions.[18]
Consultation
5.17
The Agreement received whole-of-government support at the Commonwealth
level and was provided to the Standing Committee on Treaties in September 2007.
The Committee notes that the Australian Government has worked closely with the
Tasmanian Government, which has hosted the interim Secretariat for a number of
years and indicated its willingness to host the permanent Secretariat.
Conclusion and recommendation
5.18
The Committee concurs with the Government’s view of the importance of
cooperative international action to conserve albatrosses and petrels. It
supports establishment of the permanent headquarters to ACAP in Australia and recommends that binding treaty action be taken.
Recommendation 8 |
|
The Committee supports the Headquarters Agreement between
the Government of Australia and the Secretariat to the Agreement on the
Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels and recommends that binding
treaty action be taken.
|