|
Progress on implementing projects responding to the Blueprint
recommendations (as at 25 June 2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blueprint Recommendation
|
|
Status
|
Achievements
|
|
1.1
|
Simplify
Australian Government services for citizens
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
The
Reliance Framework Business Case, developed by the Department of Finance and
Deregulation, explores a range of options to improve citizens' access to
Government services online. Specifically, the Reliance Framework seeks to
enable citizens to: communicate updated details to multiple agencies
simultaneously; pre-fill forms using information previously submitted to a
government agency; and view all their communications with government in one
place.
|
|
1.2
|
Develop
better ways to deliver services through the community and private
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
See
1.1 above
|
|
1.3
|
Deliver
services in closer partnership with State, Territory and local governments
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
See
1.1 above
|
|
1.4
|
Reduce
unnecessary business regulatory burden
|
|
COMPLETED
|
Standard
Business Reporting (SBR) has been developed to streamline financial reporting
from business to government. Approximately 80,000 businesses are benefitting
from the adoption of SBR. The ATO has announced that all electronic reporting
channels will be moved to SBR by July 2015.
|
|
2.1
|
Enable
citizens to collaborate with government in policy and service design
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
website data.gov.au was launched on 10 March 2011 to make public sector data
more available. As at 13 June 2012, it contained 1,103 datasets. In addition,
the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) released its
Principles on open public sector information in May
2011.
|
|
2.2
|
Conduct
a citizen survey
|
|
NOT PROGRESSED
|
|
|
3.1
|
Strengthen
strategic policy
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
APS Strategic Policy Network (SPN) was established in late 2010 to share best
practices and foster collaboration and innovation on strategic policy issues.
The SPN comprises SES officers from across APS agencies who meet every 2
months. This initiative has been very well supported and resulted in the
establishment of the SPN+ comprising non-SES officers.
|
|
3.2
|
Build
partnerships with academia, research institutions and the community and
private sectors
|
|
COMPLETED
|
Strategic
partnerships between the APS and academia through ANU have been established.
These partnerships included the Australian National Institute for Public
Policy (ANIPP), National Security College (NSC), the HC Coombs Policy Forum
and the Australian Centre on China in the World (CIW). Annual reports are
being prepared for ANIPP, NSC and CIW.
|
|
3.3
|
Improve
policy implementation
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
APS Policy Implementation Network (APSPIN) was established in June 2011. The
APSPIN, comprising Deputy Secretaries across a range of APS agencies, meet
regularly to share advice and experiences among members in order to better
solve key implementation challenges facing the APS. Meetings of the APSPIN
have been successful and steps are underway to create a similar
implementation network for non-SES officers.
|
|
4.1
|
Revise
and embed the APS values
|
|
COMPLETED
|
Revisions
to the APS values are included in the Public Service Amendment Bill 2012, which
was introduced into the Parliament on 1 March 2012. Supporting guidance
material has also been developed and will be provided to agencies later this
year after passage of the Bill.
|
|
4.2
|
Articulate
the roles and responsibilities of Secretaries
|
|
COMPLETED
|
Clarification
of the roles and responsibilities of Secretaries is included in the Public
Service Amendment Bill 2012. Revised performance agreements for
Secretaries were finalised in March 2012.
|
|
4.3
|
Revise
employment arrangements for Secretaries
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Public Service Amendment Bill 2012 outlines the revised employment
arrangements for Secretaries.
|
|
4.4
|
Strengthen
leadership across the APS
|
|
COMPLETED
|
A
number of senior leadership groups have been established to strengthen
leadership across the APS. The Secretaries’ Board was established in May 2010
and meets on a monthly basis. The APS 200 was established in June 2010 and
held a number of events throughout 2011. Following feedback from members, the
format for APS 200 events has been varied to include more interactive forums.
|
|
4.5
|
Improve talent management across the APS
|
|
IN
PROGRESS
|
The Strategic Centre for Leadership, Learning and Development
was established in July 2010 at the APSC. A number of programs to improve
the talent management across the APS are facilitated by the Strategic Centre,
including: an APS Leadership Development Strategy, a SES Band 2 Talent
Development Program, and an SES Orientation Program. Initial feedback from
the SES Band 2 talent management program has been positive. The APSC will be
completing biannual reports of the Strategic Centre detailing the progress,
outputs and milestones achieved.
|
|
5.1
|
New
APSC with responsibilities to lead APS
|
|
COMPLETED
|
Responsibility
for workplace relations matters for Australian Government employment
transferred to the APSC from DEEWR in August 2010 and a revised Strategic
Plan for the APS was released in October 2011. The APSC is responsible for
implementation of leadership and learning and development reform.
|
|
6.1
|
Ensure
employment bargaining arrangements support one APS
|
|
COMPLETED
|
On 31
January 2011 the APSC released the revised Australian Government Employment
Bargaining Framework. In June 2012, 92 agencies have new enterprise
agreements in place. The enterprise agreements bargained in the current round
are being analysed to assess consistency achieved with the recommended
Framework. The APSC completes biannual reports on the progress of the review
of APS classification arrangements and work level standards which is
currently being completed.
|
|
6.2
|
Assess
the size and role of the SES
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Review of the Senior Executive Service (Beale Review) was completed in the
second half of 2011 and publicly released by the Government on 16 September
2011.
|
|
7.1
|
Coordinate
workforce planning
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
APSC in collaboration with agencies has developed the APSC Workforce Planning
Guide, the APS Job Family Model and two training programs to build the
understanding and practice of workforce planning for HR Practitioners and
middle and senior managers who have workforce planning responsibilities. The
Planning Guide has been well received by agencies and is assisting them to
develop workforce plans for their organisations.
|
|
7.2
|
Streamline
recruitment and improve induction
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
The
APSJobs website has been redesigned and tested via user surveys and focus
groups. It was launched on July 2012 as the APS Recruitment Portal (Portal)
with increased functionality. APS Recruitment Guidelines have also been
updated and will be released in July 2012.
|
|
7.3
|
Expand
and strengthen learning and development
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
Work
has commenced to develop an APS Core Skills Strategy identifying the
service-wide development needs for all levels of the APS, completion is due
in the second half of 2012. The APSC will be completing biannual reports
outlining the progress and outcomes of the APS Core Skills Strategy .
|
|
7.4
|
Strengthen
the performance framework
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
A
conceptual APS Performance Management Framework is being developed. A
research paper, Developing High Performance: Performance Management for
the Public Sector, has been finalised. Case studies are being planned
involving up to six agencies to help gain a better understanding of the
issues which impact performance management. Biannual reporting by the APSC
outlines the progress and outcomes of the APS Performance Management
Framework.
|
|
7.5
|
Encourage
employees to expand their career experience
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
APSC has developed and disseminated principles supporting the effective
implementation of employee mobility initiatives of a temporary nature for
professional development purposes, and how these can be incorporated into an
agency's professional development and talent management programs.
|
|
8.1
|
Conduct
agency capability reviews
|
|
IN PROGRESS
|
Three
pilot reviews were completed in 2011 with the Department of Climate Change
and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE), the Department of Sustainability, Environment,
Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPAC), and the Department of Education,
Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). Six formal agency capability
reviews have been scheduled for 2012.
|
|
8.2
|
Introduce
shared outcomes across portfolios
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Shared Outcomes Framework has been developed. Several potential projects have
been identified and the viability of the projects as trials of the Framework
is being assessed, including clarifying the scope of possible project
activities with relevant agencies.
|
|
8.3
|
Reduce
internal red tape to promote agility
|
|
COMPLETED
|
A
number of projects have been undertaken to reduce internal red tape across
the APS including the release of the Australian Government Model Chief
Executive Instructions (CEIs) templates, updated Commonwealth Procurement
Guidelines, and revisions to the Protective Security Manual and Fraud Control
Guidelines.
|
|
9.1
|
Review
the measures of agency efficiency
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Review of the Measures of Agency Efficiency was completed in March 2011. The
review recommended keeping the efficiency dividend but improving its
flexibility.
|
|
9.2
|
Strengthen
the governance framework
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Governance Policy)
is being considered in the context of the broader Commonwealth Financial
Accountability Review (CFAR). The purpose of CFAR is to analyse the current
Commonwealth financial framework to improve governance practices, risk
management, accountability and compliance.
|
|
9.3
|
Small
agencies to improve the efficiency of their corporate functions
|
|
COMPLETED
|
The
Estimates Memorandum (EM) for ‘Shared services for new small agencies in the
Australian Government’ was issued on 20 June 2011 and requires that newly
established small agencies obtain their corporate services from their parent
agency or another existing shared service provider within the Australian
Government unless there are demonstrable net benefits of doing otherwise.
Further improvements to small agency efficiency are being considered as part
of CFAR.
|
|