Standing Committee on Employment, Education
and Workplace Relations
This document has been scanned from the original printed submission.
It may contain some errors
Submission 71
THE AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY LTD
1 GRATTAN STREET, CARLTON VIC 3053
PO BOX 126 CARLTON SOUTH VIC 3053 AUSTRALIA
TELEPHONE 1800 333 497 OR (03) 9663 6166 FACSIMILE (03) 9663 6177
18 November 1997
Re: Inquiry into the Appropriate Roles of Institutes of Technical and
Further Education
Thank you for your letter of 30 October 1997 advising that submissions
to the above Inquiry are still acceptable.
The Australian Psychological Society (APS) wishes to indicate that it
supports the continued education and training of psychologists at the
university level in order to maintain the credibility of that training.
There should be no overlap with TAFE institutes as all psychology training
should continue to be conducted in the university sector. Furthermore,
universities are unlikely to accept or give credit for any related studies
completed at TAFE for students wishing to transfer into an APS-accredited
psychology program. Current policy and guidelines expressly preclude this
option.
I outline below the current position regarding the training of psychologists
in Australia.
Psychologists are currently required to have a four year Honours degree
or equivalent to be Associate Members of the APS or to be eligible for
provisional or conditional registration in each State and Territory in
Australia. Full membership of the APS, and full registration, requires
6 years of either training (undergraduate/postgraduate) or training plus
supervision; both involve 4 years of university training plus 2 years.
The APS has introduced 6 years of university training as a minimum requirement
for full membership of the Society from 2000 and continues to lobby registration
boards to do likewise.
The APS operates a system of accrediting university programs in Psychology,
covering 3 year and 4 year programs, up to Honours equivalent, and 5th
and 6th year coursework programs. Accreditation of the programs
deems the graduates eligible for the relevant grade of membership of the
Society. While the accreditation process has been in existence for many
years, a new accreditation system was introduced in 1996 whereby Academic
Organisation Units (rather than single departments) and the total package
of programs offered are accredited. This enables careful examination (via
submitted documentation and a site visit) of the resources invested in
the training of psychologists and of the structure and content of the
programs. Accreditation Guidelines, developed by the Society, assist in
establishing certain standards for the programs and while not prescriptive,
are considered sufficient for the teaching of psychology as a scientific
discipline and an applied profession.
Registration Boards also require certain minimum educational qualifications
for registration; each however has the legislative powers to determine
what should be considered acceptable. In practice, many consult the list
of programs accredited by the APS although they may not acknowledge this
publicly. The Registration Boards were also amongst the key stockholders
included in the consultative phase of the development of the new Accreditation
Guidelines in 1995 and they are kept fully apprised of the APS activities
in accreditation.
The APS Colleges, which represent specialist areas of psychological practice,
are also involved in the approval of specialist postgraduate coursework
training programs (such as Master of Clinical Psychology courses). Each
College has developed Course Approval Guidelines, which specify requirements
unique to the particular specialisation, and members of the relevant College(s)
are included in the site visits made by the accreditation team.
Should you require any further information, please contact me directly.
I look forward to reading the report of the Inquiry's deliberations.
Dr Alison F Garton FAPS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
cc Professor Jeff Richards, Director of Training and Standards
Back to top