Key issue
This year (2022) has seen global human displacement rise to record levels. Australia offers resettlement to refugees through the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), but the number of places available under this program remains relatively low, particularly in the context of increasing demand.
Australia also faces the question of resolving the status of almost 20,000 people currently living here on temporary protection visas, and that of the offshore processing cohort who have not yet been granted permanent resettlement in any country.
While the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in many
restrictions on human movement globally over the last 2 years, the number of
refugees worldwide has continued to rise. As at the end of
2021 there were around 89.3 million forcibly displaced worldwide, including
around 27.1 million refugees and 4.6 million asylum seekers. Recent
crisis situations in Afghanistan, Venezuela and Ukraine – there are now more
than 6 million
refugees from Ukraine alone – have pushed these numbers even higher. The
UNHCR now estimates
that the number of persons displaced around the world exceeds 100 million
for the first time on record.
Australia has a long history of welcoming refugees
and others in humanitarian need. However, Australia’s policy responses to human
displacement have been the subject of much debate over the last several years,
both within the Parliament and outside it. These policy issues, including the
size of Australia’s humanitarian intake and the future of temporary protection
visas and offshore processing, are likely to be of concern to the new Parliament.
Global refugee trends
Numbers of refugees and other displaced persons
have reached record
levels in the first half of 2022. As at the end
of 2021, the UNHCR reported that the top source countries for refugees and people
in refugee-like situations were Syria (6.8 million people), Venezuela
(4.6 million people), Afghanistan (2.7 million people) and South
Sudan (2.4 million people). Since then, Ukraine has become a major source
country of refugees, with over 6.5 million refugees
estimated to have left Ukraine for neighbouring countries since 24 February
2022.
Most refugees, and other people displaced across
international borders, are hosted in countries close to the refugees’ country
of origin. As
at the end of 2021, some 83% of refugees were being hosted by low and middle
income countries, with the largest refugee populations being hosted by Turkey
(3.8 million), Colombia (1.8 million), Uganda (1.5 million) and
Pakistan (1.5 million). Figure 1 shows the locations of refugees and other
international displaced persons around the world, by population size, as at the
end of 2021.
Figure 1 Refugees, people in
refugee-like situations and Venezuelans displaced abroad, end of 2021
Source: United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR), Global
Trends: Forced Displacement in 2021, (Geneva: UNHCR, 2022), 21.
Australia is one of only 23
countries that accepted refugees for resettlement in 2021 through the UNHCR resettlement process.
However, resettlement in a third country is available for less than 1% of the
global refugee population each year, with those considered the most vulnerable
prioritised for referral to resettlement countries. In 2021
UNHCR submitted resettlement applications for around 61, 000 people. Most
refugees remain in countries close to their country of origin and wait either
to be able to return home (voluntary
repatriation), or for permission to remain permanently in their host
country (local
integration).
Australia’s Humanitarian Program
Australia maintains a formal Humanitarian
Program under which people may be granted either a permanent visa to
resettle in Australia from overseas (offshore
resettlement), or, if they are already in Australia, a permanent protection
visa permitting them to stay (onshore
protection).
The offshore resettlement component of the program
comprises both refugees who are referred to Australia for resettlement by the
UNHCR (usually around 6,000 places per year), and people in humanitarian need who
are proposed for resettlement by a person or organisation in Australia. People
in the latter category do not need to demonstrate they meet the threshold for
refugee status under the UN Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees, although many do.
The onshore protection component of the program
comprises people who arrive in Australia with a valid visa and subsequently
apply for, and are found to be owed, protection. It does not include those who arrive
in Australia ‘irregularly’- that is, either by boat or by air without a valid
visa. People in this category who are found to be owed protection are currently
not eligible for permanent visas and are not counted within the permanent
Humanitarian Program. Instead, they are granted a temporary protection visa
valid for either 3 or 5 years (see further discussion below).
The Government sets a planning figure for the
Humanitarian Program each year. The planning figure was around 13,750 for many
years (with a temporary
boost to 20,000 under the last Labor Government in 2012–13). Under the
Coalition Government the planning figure reverted to 13,750, but was then gradually
increased beginning in 2015–16 to provide for an
additional 12,000 places over 4 years for people displaced by conflict in
Syria and Iraq, before being reduced again to 13,750 in 2019–20. Table 1 shows
total Humanitarian Program visas grants over the last 10 years, by offshore and
onshore components.
Table 1 Humanitarian Program by
component, 2011–12 to 2020–21
| Year |
Offshore
resettlement |
Onshore
protection |
Total
Humanitarian
Program
grants |
| 2011–12 |
6,718 |
7,038 |
13,756 |
| 2012–13 |
12,515 |
7,507 |
20,022 |
| 2013–14 |
11,016 |
2,752 |
13,768 |
| 2014–15 |
11,009 |
2,750 |
13,759 |
| 2015–16 |
15,552 |
2,003 |
17,555 |
| 2016–17 |
20,257 |
1,711 |
21,968 |
| 2017–18 |
14,825 |
1,425 |
16,250 |
| 2018–19 |
17,112 |
1,650 |
18,762 |
| 2019–20 |
11,521 |
1,650 |
13,171 |
| 2020–21 |
4,558 |
1,389 |
5,947 |
Source: Department of Home Affairs, Australian Migration Statistics 2020–21, Table 3.0,
December 2021.
The 2019–20 and 2020–21 program years saw a
significant drop in the number of entrants under the Humanitarian Program due
to the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting border closures. The granting of
offshore humanitarian visas was suspended
on 19 March 2020 (p. 12), and resettlement of refugees who had already been
granted a visa under the offshore component of the Humanitarian Program was also
largely suspended in March
2020, in line with the UNHCR and International Organization for Migration (IOM)
suspension
of resettlement travel. With borders not reopening
to humanitarian entrants until December 2021 it is possible the Humanitarian
Program planning figure may similarly not be reached for 2021–22.
Stakeholders have been calling
for an increase in Australia’s humanitarian intake for many years, in line
with the UNHCR’s
goal of increasing third-country resettlement places globally, and in
response to recent crisis situations such as in Afghanistan. The Morrison
Government announced
in January 2022 that it would provide 10,000 humanitarian visas for Afghan
nationals over the next 4 years (as well as quarantining 5,000 family visas for
Afghans) but these places were to be allocated within the existing Humanitarian
Program quota, not in addition to it. More recently, there have been calls
for Australia to accept large numbers of refugees from Ukraine on top of
the existing Humanitarian Program quota.
The Australian Labor Party (ALP) has not expressly committed
to increasing the humanitarian intake, but its 2021
National Platform states that it ‘aspires’ to progressively increase the
intake to 27,000 per year (p. 123). This was the figure recommended
by the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers in 2012, and, if reached, will
represent Australia’s largest
annual humanitarian intake on record.
What next for those on temporary protection visas?
As noted above, asylum seekers who arrive in
Australia irregularly (either by boat or by air without a valid visa), and are
found to be owed protection, are not currently counted in the permanent
Humanitarian Program, as they are not granted a permanent visa. Instead, under changes
made to the Migration Act 1958 in 2014, they
are granted one of 2 temporary visas- a 3-year Temporary
Protection Visa (TPV) or a 5-year Safe
Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV). The latter offers a
chance at permanent residency for those who work or study in a designated
regional area for 3 and a half years without claiming social security payments,
and can meet the criteria for a permanent skilled or family visa. For both visas,
the protection claim must be re‑proved every 3 or 5 years in order to be
eligible for a subsequent TPV or SHEV (unless they have met the SHEV
permanent residency pathway requirements).
There is a large group of refugees in Australia
holding a form of temporary protection- as
at 30 April 2022 there were 18,959 people in
Australia holding either a TPV or a SHEV. These are people who arrived in
Australia prior to the introduction of Operation Sovereign Borders in 2013, and
so were not transferred offshore for processing (see discussion of offshore
processing below). Temporary protection has been widely criticised by refugee
advocates and human rights groups who argue
that it keeps refugees in a state of fear and uncertainty, making it difficult
for them to settle into the community and rebuild their lives. The ALP has argued that temporary protection is ‘costly
and wasteful’, and unnecessary for deterrence, so long as boat turnbacks and
offshore processing remain in place.
The ALP has committed to abolishing
temporary protection visas and moving refugees currently on temporary visas
onto permanent visas (p. 123). This will require amendments to the Migration
Regulations 1994, which currently provide that a
person who is an unauthorised maritime arrival (as defined by section 5AA of the Migration Act)
or who holds, or has ever held, a TPV or SHEV, is unable to make a valid
application for a permanent protection visa (regulation 1401(3)(d)). It will
also require the minister to ‘lift the bar’ under section 46A of the Migration Act to
allow people in this cohort to make a valid visa application—section 46A provides
that a visa application is not valid if it is made by an unauthorised maritime
arrival in Australia who is an unlawful non-citizen or who holds a
bridging visa, temporary protection visa, or a temporary visa of a prescribed
kind, unless the minister makes a determination that this provision does not
apply.
While amending the Regulations will be sufficient
to enable people currently on TPVs and SHEVs to be granted a permanent visa, it
is the Act, not the Regulations, that provides for the existence of these
temporary visas. Abolishing these visa classes entirely would therefore require
the Government to amend the Migration Act.
Resettling the offshore processing cohort
One of the most criticised aspects of Australia’s refugee
and asylum seeker policies over the last decade has been the processing of
asylum seekers in Australian-funded centres in Nauru and Papua New Guinea (PNG).
The transfer of asylum seekers to offshore processing centres, which had been a
feature of asylum policy under the Howard Government from 2001 to 2007, recommenced
under the Gillard Labor Government in 2012. Since September 2013, offshore
processing, along with turning boats around at sea, has been a cornerstone of Operation Sovereign Borders, the
Coalition Government’s response to asylum seekers arriving by sea. Numerous
critics including refugee
advocates, human rights
groups, and legal
and medical
experts have condemned this policy, arguing that it has caused significant harm
to the people transferred offshore, has wasted billions of dollars, and is in breach
of Australia’s international obligations. Offshore processing has also been the
subject of multiple inquiries
and reviews
investigating allegations of self-harm and physical and sexual abuse.
The ALP
has stated that it will retain the key elements of Operation Sovereign
Borders by continuing to turn asylum seeker boats back at sea ‘where it is safe
to do so’, and maintaining an offshore processing capability in Nauru for any
irregular maritime asylum seekers who cannot be safely turned back. With most
vessels now being intercepted and turned back at sea, it is unlikely that large
numbers of asylum seekers will be transferred for offshore processing in the
future. The key issue for the incoming Government will therefore be finding
suitable resettlement outcomes for the people from this cohort who remain in
limbo in Nauru and Australia.
It was initially intended that people transferred from Australia to
a processing centre in PNG or Nauru who were found to be refugees would either
settle there permanently (in the case of PNG) or be granted a long-term visa to
remain (in the case of Nauru). PNG finalised its refugee resettlement policy in June 2015 and resettlement
of refugees began late in 2015. Regional processing
arrangements in PNG ended
on 31 December 2021 and people remaining in PNG after this date are no
longer considered part of Australia’s regional processing caseload. Their
resettlement options (either in PNG or elsewhere) will be determined by the
Government of PNG.
Regional processing remains in place in Nauru, with
a new memorandum of understanding to ‘establish an enduring regional processing
capability’ there having been signed
in September 2021. As at 30
April 2022 there were 112 people remaining in Nauru who had been
transferred there under Operation Sovereign Borders- 83 confirmed refugees, 12
still in a refugee status determination process, and 17 who had been found not
to be refugees. Additionally, as
at 4 April 2022 there were 1,175 ‘transitory persons’ in Australia (p. 12)- that
is, people from the offshore processing cohort who have been temporarily
brought to Australia, generally for medical treatment or to accompany someone
who requires medical treatment. None of these people is eligible to settle
permanently in Australia, and the ALP
has stated that it will continue the policy of not allowing them (or any
potential future maritime arrivals) to settle here. Currently, the long-term
options available to this group of people are to voluntarily return to their
country of origin, settle permanently in Nauru, or apply for resettlement to
the US or New Zealand.
The Turnbull Government announced in November 2016 that it had agreed on a
resettlement arrangement with the US, under which up to 1,250 people who had
been found to be refugees would be resettled to the US from the Regional
Processing Centres in Nauru and PNG. As at 30 April 2022, 1,002 refugees had been resettled in the US under this
arrangement- 401 departed from Nauru, 427 departed from PNG and 174
departed from Australia. This means there are roughly 250 places remaining under
this arrangement.
In March 2022, following many years of refusing to accept a resettlement offer from New Zealand,
the Morrison Government announced that it had reached an agreement with New Zealand
to resettle up to 150 people from the offshore processing caseload there each
year for the next 3 years. These 450 resettlement places, and the remaining
places in the US resettlement agreement, will offer a chance at permanent
resettlement for around half of the people remaining in the regional processing
caseload. A small number of people have been resettled in other countries, including Canada, through private sponsorship
arrangements. This option will likely still exist, but the
numbers available through this pathway are likely to continue to be very small.
Resolving the status of the remaining several hundred people in this cohort is therefore
likely to be a significant challenge for the incoming Government, and a subject
of intense interest to many in the Parliament.
Further reading
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2021, (Geneva: UNHCR, 2022).
Janet Phillips, Australia’s Humanitarian Program: a Quick Guide to the Statistics Since 1947, Research paper series 2016–17, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, 2017).