Debate resumed by Mr Leeser who moved, as an amendment—That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:
“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:
(1)notes with concern that:
(a)Australia’s tertiary education sector is significantly over-regulated;
(b)providers report to multiple competing and overlapping bodies; and
(c)some providers are required by law to deal with more than 300 different pieces of legislation and regulation;
(2)affirms that the objective of tertiary education in Australia must focus on teaching, learning and research, and should otherwise be aimed at promoting a dynamic and innovative sector that provides a positive student experience, delivers value for money, improves Australia’s productivity and supports Australian values;
(3)further notes widespread concern among the tertiary sector and expert stakeholders about the drafting of this legislation; and
(4)calls for this legislation to be the subject of proper and thorough scrutiny”.
Debate ensued.