D. References to offensive or unparliamentary language in other jurisdictions

D. References to offensive or unparliamentary language in other jurisdictions

Table D.1Summary of references to offensive or unparliamentary language in standing orders

Jurisdiction

Chamber

References to offensive/unparliamentary language

Australia (Federal)

Senate

“objectionable words”

“offensive words”

“imputations of improper motives and all personal reflections”

Australian Capital Territory

Legislative Assembly

“offensive or disorderly words”

“imputations of improper motives and all personal reflections”

New South Wales

Legislative Assembly

“offensive or disorderly words”

New South Wales

Legislative Council

“offensive words”

“imputations of improper motives”

“personal reflections”

Northern Territory

Legislative Assembly

“offensive or disorderly words”

“imputations of improper motives”

“personal reflections”

Queensland

Legislative Assembly

“personal reflections”

“unbecoming or offensive words”

South Australia

House of Assembly

“offensive or unbecoming words”

“impute improper motives”

“personal reflections”

“unparliamentary language”

South Australia

Legislative Council

“objectionable or offensive words”

“injurious reflections”

Tasmania

House of Assembly

“offensive or unbecoming words”

“attribute…unbecoming conduct or motives”

“offensive reference to a member’s private affairs”

“all personal reflections”

Tasmania

Legislative Council

“imputations of improper motives and all personal reflections”

“offensive or unparliamentary expressions”

Victoria

Legislative Assembly

“imputations of improper motives and personal reflections”

“offensive or unbecoming words”

“objectionable or unparliamentary”

“personally offensive”

Victoria

Legislative Council

“offensive words”

“accusation of improper motives or personal reflection”

“personally offensive”

“unparliamentary expressions”

Western Australia

Legislative Assembly

“offensive words”

“improper motives and personal reflections”

“objectionable or unparliamentary"

Western Australia

Legislative Council

“objectionable words”

“offensive words”

“imputations of improper motives and personal reflections”

“unparliamentary language”

New Zealand

House of Representatives

“offensive or disorderly words”

“imputation of improper motives”

“offensive reference to a member’s private affairs”

“personal reflection against a member”

“unparliamentary expression”

Canada

House of Commons

“disrespectful or offensive language”

“offensive words”

Canada

Senate

“personal, sharp or taxing speeches”

“unparliamentary language”

United Kingdom

House of Commons

N/A

United Kingdom

House of Lords

“personally insulting or offensive speeches”

Source: Procedure Office, as at 29 March 2023.