Bills Digest No. 165 2004–05
Higher Education Support Amendment (Melbourne University
Private) Bill 2005
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background to Bill
Background to Melbourne University Private
Comment to Bill
Main Provisions
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Higher Education Support
Amendment (Melbourne
University Private) Bill 2005
Date Introduced:
16 March 2005
House: House
of Representatives
Portfolio: Education, Science and Training
Commencement: Royal
Assent
To amend the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the HESA) to add
Melbourne University Private (MUP) to the list of Table B higher education
providers. This will allow MUP to have access to Commonwealth research
funding and to enable its students to obtain Commonwealth loans for their
tuition fees through the FEE-HELP scheme.
The matters dealt with in this Bill had previously been included in an
omnibus Bill, the Higher Education Legislation Amendment Bill
(No. 3) 2004. On 11 August 2004, that Bill was referred to the Senate
Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee.(1)
The purpose of the referral was for the Committee to consider the provisions
dealing with MUP. The earlier Bill lapsed at the end of the 40th
Parliament. The Bill was reintroduced in November 2004 without those
parts dealing with Melbourne University Private.
Background
to Melbourne University Private
Melbourne University Private is a company limited by shares, with the
University of Melbourne as its sole shareholder. It is governed by a board
of directors which is subject to the normal laws and regulations applicable
to companies. Academic affairs and all matters affecting the university
status of MUP are the responsibility of the Academic Senate, which advises
the board of directors.
The Senate is led by the Vice President and Provost and consists of Academic
Heads of Schools, Executive Deans (academic and management), the president
and CEO, the Academic Registrar, at least three and up to six external
members, who are nominated by the Vice President and Provost, all academic
staff of professorial level, one graduate student and one member of the
non-professorial staff, elected by the non-professorial staff.
MUP sees itself as having a mission which is quite distinct from public
universities: all its degree programs have been developed for either a
specific government or corporate client, or in response to the needs of
specific industry sectors. Its three ‘schools’ operate simultaeously as
academic and business units.
MUP was established in July 1998 under a Ministerial Order of the then
Victorian Minister of Education. This gave the institution the right to
operate as a university over a five-year establishment period after which
it was required to apply to the Minister for a renewal of the order. It
then had to convince a panel appointed by the Minister that it had satisfied
the National Protocols for Higher Education Approval Processes, approved
in 2000 by the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training
and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA).
In February 2002 the Minister gave the MUP the choice of either operating
within an essentially traditional model and setting minimum requirements
for research and research training, or changing its name to remove the
word 'university'. MUP opted for the former course, and in July 2003 Minister
Kosky granted the university approval to continue to operate for a further
five years under a new Ministerial
Order.(2) The Minister stipulated that the university abide
by seven conditions:
-
by July 2004 each of the three schools must produce a minimum of
one peer-reviewed externally published research output per equivalent
full time academic staff member
-
a progressive increase in the proportion of higher education activity,
so that by 2008 at least 10 per cent of total enrolments are in higher
education award courses
-
a Chief Academic Officer, be appointed and Heads of School and academic
staff be employed full time within the five years
-
the retention of an academic organisational structure, with at least
three Schools. All conjoint University of Melbourne–MUP appointments
are required to undertake research
-
an Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) audit be undertaken
by July 2007
-
MUP must to provide an Annual Report to Parliament, containing information
on relevant performance indicators, and
-
the University of Melbourne is required to maintain a majority interest
in MUP.
In September 2003, the Australian
Qualifications Framework Advisory Board (AQFAB)(3) received
a recommendation from the Victorian government that the university be
listed as a self-accrediting higher education institution on the AQF registers.
This brought it within the national quality assurance framework. Under
the AQF, the university has the authority to accredit its own programs,
and is responsible for maintaining its own quality assurance regime. MUP
is also subject to audit by the Australian Universities Quality Agency,
which was established by the Australian government to conduct quality
assurance audits of self-accrediting institutions. The AUQA audit process
covers teaching, learning, research and management.
In addition to its distinctive mission, the MUP differs from other Australian
universities in a number of other ways:
it operates under a Ministerial Order rather than its own
establishing legislation. Other private universities, such as Bond and
Notre Dame, were established under specific State Acts – namely the Bond University
Act 1987 (Qld)(4) and the University
of Notre Dame Australia Act 1989 (WA)(5)
-
its continued existence as a university is dependent upon it meeting
a number of conditions set out by the State Minister
-
it is the only private university owned by a public university
-
it has no undergraduates and only 250 postgraduate students – with
a further 160 students undertaking non-award professional development
courses
-
it obtains most of its revenue from English language schools and
consulting projects, and
-
it is not a member of the Australian Vice Chancellors’ Committee
(Bond is a member, Notre Dame has not applied for membership). There
have been media reports that the AVCC Board recommended that MUP not
be admitted as a member.(6)
The Bill was considered by the Senate Workplace Relations and Education
Legislation Committee.(7) The Committee’s Report(8)
was tabled on 31 August 2004. Several submissions, including those from
the Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee, the National Tertiary Education
Union, the Federation of Scientific and Technological Societies (FASTS)
and Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations were critical of the
proposal to include MUP in Table B. The Opposition Senator’s dissenting
report(9) sets out a detailed criticism of the proposal.
Item 1 of Schedule 1 amends ss.16-20 of the HESA to include MUP in Table
B.
Note: Division 16 of Part 2-1 of the HESA defines higher education providers.
There are two listed types of providers: those in Table A (s.16-15) and
those listed in Table B (s.16-20). Table A providers can receive grants
through the Commonwealth Grant Scheme as provided for by Part 2-2. Table
B providers can only receive such grants if they relate to national priorities
(s.30-1). However, Table B providers are eligible for grants to support
research and the training of research students (ss. 41-10).
-
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/highered04/index.htm.
-
http://www.dpc.vic.gov.au/domino/Web_Notes/newmedia.nsf/0/c32e63b0ddce91
fcca256d3b007eaf25?OpenDocument.
-
http://www.aqf.edu.au/register.htm.
-
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/bua1987204/.
-
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/wa/consol_act/uondaa1989371/.
-
The Australian, 26 May 2004 ‘New uni’s plea to join gang’;
Australian Financial Review, 2 August 2004 ‘MUP still kept out
in the cold’.
-
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/highered04/index.htm.
-
ttp://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/highered04/report/index.htm.
-
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/highered04/report/c02.pdf.
Kim Jackson
25 May 2005
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament
using information available at the time of production. The views expressed
do not reflect an official position of the Information and Research Service,
nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the
public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2005
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their
official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2005.

|