Bills Digest No. 66, 2004–05
Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs Legislation
Amendment (2004 Election Commitments) Bill 2004
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs Legislation
Amendment (2004 Election Commitments) Bill 2004
Date Introduced: 18 November 2004
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs
Commencement: There is a variety of commencement
dates for different parts of this Bill, as set out in the Table
in Clause 2 of the Bill.
This Bill proposes to amend the Social Security Act 1999 (SSA),
the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the A New Tax
System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 (FAA) to give effect
to several 2004 Election commitments made by the government. The commitments
are in respect of self-funded retirees, older Australians, carers on
income support, grandparents caring for children and certain Veterans’
Affairs disability pensioners.
Schedule 1 proposes to amend the SSA and the VEA to introduce
a new utilities allowance (UA) for recipients of the age pension and
the veterans’ age service pension. It is also proposed to pay the UA
to recipients of the veterans’ income support supplement (ISS) and also
to those receiving the invalidity service pension and who are aged more
than service pension age, which is age 60 for males.(1)
Invalidity service pension can be paid up to age 65 and there would
be a few recipients aged 60 to 64.
The new UA is proposed to be $100 a year for a single pensioner and
$50 a year each for a partnered pensioner and this rate is to be indexed
twice annually to the CPI.
The government announced the new UA in its 2004 Election policy platform,
Recognising senior Australians – their needs and their carers.(2)
The policy platform claims the new UA will benefit around 2.2 million
older Australians at a cost of $594.6 million over four years.(3)
The Explanatory Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the anticipated
cost of this proposal is $610.1 million over four years.
The government’s justification for the new UA was set out in the 2004
election policy platform, being:
older Australians on income support receive access to one
of a number of concession cards that provide access to cheaper prescriptions
and a range of other benefits. Nonetheless, the Coalition recognises
that some older Australians who rely on income support payments can
experience difficulty in saving up to pay regular household bills such
as the gas or electricity bill.(4)
It is proposed to pay the UA twice yearly on 20 March and 20 September
of each year. So for single pensioners entitled to the UA of $100 a
year, $50 will be paid each in March and September. The 20th
of March and the 20th of September is also the date on which
the twice yearly indexation of the pension rate and the ISS rate to
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and to 25% of Male Total Average Weekly
Earnings (MTAWE) occurs.
The new UA is proposed to be paid to all recipients of the age pension
and the veterans’ age service pension. It is also proposed to provide
the UA to recipients of the veterans’ ISS and invalidity service pension
who are aged more than age service pension age. ISS is an income support
payment, paid in addition to the veterans’ war widows’/ers’ pension,
to those whose income and assets fall below the pensions income and
assets test limits.
By limiting the new UA to age pension, service pension, ISS and invalidity
service pension recipients over age or service pension age, the UA is
targeted at retired aged Australians who are on lower levels of income.
The age pension, the service pension, the ISS and the invalidity service
pension all have the same income and asset test limits.
The principle difference between the civilian age pension provided under
the SSA and the age service pension provided under the VEA is the age
service pension is available to qualified veterans five years earlier
than the age pension. For males the age pension qualification age is
65 and for the veterans’ age service pension it is age 60. For females
the age pension age is being incrementally raised from age 55 up to
age 60.(5) Likewise the qualification age for females to
qualify for the veterans’ age service pension is being incrementally
raised from age 55 up to age 60.(6)
Age pension, age service pension, ISS and invalidity service pension
recipients are issued with the Pensioner Concession Card (PCC). The
PCC entitles the holder to subsidised medicines under the Pharmaceutical
Benefits Scheme (PBS). As well as this, the PCC may also provide access
to extra concessions from state and local government authorities. These
concessions may include:
-
reductions in property and water rates
-
reductions in energy bills
-
-
reduced fares on public transport
-
reductions on motor vehicle registration
-
one or more free rail journeys within the state each year
PCC concessions vary from state to state and
some of these extra concessions are also available to dependents.
It is only proposed to provide the UA to older Australians on a government
income support payment, being those who have reached the age pension
or age service pension qualifying age. However, there are other like
income support recipients to age and service pensioners to whom this
Bill does not propose to provide a UA. These are widow B pensioners,
parenting payment – single pensioners (commonly referred to as sole
parent pensioners), disability support pensioners, invalidity service
pensioners (aged less than service pension age) and carer payment recipients
(commonly called carer pension). These pension payment recipients are
paid at the same rate as age and service pensioners, have the same income
and assets tests and are also issued with a PCC.
Schedule 2 of the Bill proposes to introduce a new seniors concession
allowance for some self-funded retirees.(7) The new allowance
will be $200 a year paid in two instalments on 1 June and 1 December
of each year. Not all self-funded retires are to be paid the allowance,
only those entitled to a Commonwealth Seniors Health Care Card (CSHC).
The government announced the new seniors concession allowance in its
2004 Election policy platform, Recognising senior Australians – their
needs and their carers.(8) The policy platform claimed
that there are now over 287,000 self-funded retirees with a CSHC and
the new seniors concession allowance of $200 per person per year would
cost $282.6 million over four years.(9) The Explanatory
Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the anticipated cost of
this proposal is $258.3 million over four years.
The Policy platform claimed that the justification for the new seniors
concession allowance was:
The Coalition has sought to provide self funded retirees
with further concessions, offering state and territory governments $75
million. Unfortunately, no state or territory government has taken
up this offer that would provide concessions for energy, rates, water
and sewerage and motor vehicle registration costs. A re-elected Coalition
Government will not wait for state and territory governments to provide
self funded retirees holding a Commonwealth Seniors Health Card with
the concessions they deserve.(10)
The Bill proposes that the seniors concession allowance be provided
to all holders of the CSHC. Holders of the CSHC are those who are over
age pension age but not receiving an age or service pension due to income
or assets and have annual income below $50,000 for a single or $80,000
(combined) for a couple.
The rate of the seniors concession allowance is to be $200 per person
per year. This means a couple would be paid $400 a year. The $200
allowance is to be indexed to the CPI. The Bill proposes the allowance
be paid in two instalments per year on 1 June and 1 December of each
year.
In July 2001, the commonwealth government announced it had commenced
negotiations with the states/territories to provide a wider range of
concessions for CSHC holders.(11) The commonwealth was unable
to come to an agreement with the states about the provision of concessions
to CSHC holders.(12) The commonwealth claimed their offer
would have saved CSHC holders an average of nearly $700 a year on their
rates, car registration, electricity charges, water and sewerage. The
commonwealth government’s claim was that it had offered the states and
territories $75 million to provide these concessions for CSHC holders
and that all states/territories, excluding Western Australia and South
Australia, rejected the offer during a meeting of Community and Disability
Services Ministers in Hobart.(13)
The CSHC was introduced from July 1994. The main benefit with the
CSHC is it entitles the holder to subsidised medicines under the PBS.
However, the CSHC does not provide access to the concessions available
with the PCC. The concessions pensioners are able to access with the
PCC are outlined above in the section titled Other concessions provided
to age pension, age service pension, ISS, and invalidity service pension
recipients in the background comments about Schedule 1.
Initially, the CSHC was available to people of age pension age whose
income was low enough for them to qualify for the age pension, but who
were not eligible for some other reason. The most common reasons were
insufficient length of residence in Australia and asset holdings which
prevented them from satisfying the assets test. The original purpose
of the card was to provide extra assistance to retired persons who were
on low-income. With the income limits the same as for the age pension,
the vast majority of retired people issued with a CSHC were those who
were asset rich but income poor, mostly farmers.
From January 1999, the income test for the CSHC was changed to one
based on taxable income and the income limits were substantially increased.(14)
The increased income test limits introduced at this time changed the
nature of the CSHC. It ceased to be targeted at low-income retirees
and was now available for middle-income retirees.
The 2001-02 Budget included a measure to further increase the income
limits.(15) In addition, CSHC holders were made eligible
for the Telephone Allowance (worth $68.80 per annum) that had previously
been available only to pensioners. The new income limits were $50,000
for a single person and $80,000 for a couple (combined). These new
income limits, coupled with the fact the income test is now one of adjusted
taxable income, means the CSHC is no longer a low-income card for self-funded
retirees.
It has been a long-standing complaint of self-funded retirees that
they are not able to access the PCC concessions available to pensioners.
Provision of concessions to pensioners was originally intended as recognition
that to qualify for a pension under the income and asset tests a person
must be on low income. Also, many pensioners are long-term income support
recipients, for example, widow pensioners, age pensioners. Concessions
therefore are aimed at helping to relieve the burden of essential expenditure
items for low-income persons on long-term income support.
However, self-funded retirees have for a long time seen it as unfair
that pensioners have been provided with concessions and they have not.
Common comments and complaints are:
I have done the right thing by saving and working hard
to provide for my own retirement - why don’t I get concessions?
Self-funded retirees consider that, given they are not on a pension
and a not burden on the taxpayer, they too should have access to concessions.
Schedule 3 of the Bill proposes to amend the SSA to allow carer
payment (commonly referred to as carer pension) recipients up to 25
hours a week absent from their caring role to undertake training, voluntary
work or paid work. The SSA currently allows 20 hours a week.
This proposal to extend the carers allowable time off to train or work
from 20 to 25 hours was announced 2004 Election policy platform, Recognising
senior Australians – their needs and their carers.(16)
To provide more opportunities and flexibility for carers
to combine caring with work, training or study, a re-elected Coalition
Government will provide $19.0 million over four years to increase the
hours carers can participate in these activities without losing eligibility
for Carer Payment from 20 to 25 hours per week.(17)
The election policy platform paper estimates this extension of hours
will cost an extra $19 million over four years. The Explanatory Memorandum
attached to the Bill details that the anticipated cost of this proposal
is $19.5 million over four years from 1 April 2005.
Carer payment is a pension income support payment provided to full-time
carers providing the primary care to a person requiring constant care.
Provision of income support recognises that the carer is unable to support
themselves from employment because of their full-time caring role.
However, there are time restrictions in the SSA on the time a carer
can spend away from their caring role for such activities as respite,
work and education. This is because of fears that if the carer was
able to spend long periods away from caring, they would no longer be
providing constant care, as is otherwise required by the legislation.(18)
Section 198AC of the SSA allows the carer periods away from the caring
for certain prescribed reasons/activities and for prescribed periods,
for example hospitalisation of the caree (person being cared for).
Originally, the carer pension, as it was then called, did not allow
the carer any time away from the caring role to work or train part-time,
as it was then considered to be at odds with the constant care requirements.
This has been progressively relaxed to allow the carer to access respite,
and also to allow the carer to prepare for a possible future non-caring
role and to maintain links with employment opportunities.
Schedule 4 of the Bill proposes to introduce a new special rate
of Child Care Benefit (CCB) for grandparents that are principal carers
to cover the full cost of child care fees in ‘approved’ child care.
CCB is a payment to help families who use ‘approved’ and ‘registered’
child care. Normally, how much CCB can be paid is affected by:
-
the level of family income,
-
whether the child care used is ‘approved’ care or ‘registered’
child care, and
-
whether the child is a school aged child.
This proposal to introduce a special CCB rate for grandparents with
a child in ‘approved’ child care was announced 2004 Election policy
platform, Recognising senior Australians – their needs and their
carer.(19) The platform stated:
A re-elected Coalition Government will also make child
care more accessible for grandparents in receipt of income support,
such as aged pension or carer payment, by enabling them to access Special
Rate Child Care Benefit. Special Rate Child Care Benefit will cover
the full cost of child care fees charged to eligible grandparents.
Grandparents will be able to access Special Rate Child Care Benefit
from 1 January 2005, subject to the passage of legislation.(20)
The government claimed their extra assistance for child care for grandparents
would cost an additional $70 million over four years. The Explanatory
Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the anticipated cost of
this proposal is an extra $78.6 million over four years from 1 January
2005.
The 2004 election policy platform presented the rationale for this
proposed special rate of CCB for grandparents using ‘approved’ child
care as:
Grandparents who have responsibility for the primary care
of young grandchildren face the same challenges as younger parents.
However, many grandparents do not enjoy the health, energy or vigour
that can often be needed to care full time for these children. Although
grandparents have access to assistance such as parenting payment, family
tax benefit, and child care benefit, caring for young grandchildren
can also be financially draining.(21)
The new special CCB rate is to be payable to a grandparent and great-grandparent
who is the child’s grandparent (or great-grandparent) by birth, or by
adoption or by relationship as a step-parent. This excludes other older
age adult carers of children, who are not the child’s grandparent, like
great aunts/uncles, from receiving the new special rate CCB.
To be qualified for the special CCB grandparent rate, the grandparent
needs to be on an income support payment provided under the SAA or the
VEA. Also, the grandparent needs to be the sole or major provider on
a daily basis for the child and have substantial autonomy for day-to-day
decisions about the child’s care, welfare and development. This is
very much the same care requirements required to qualify for family
tax benefit (FTB) for a child.
However, the Bill does not link or require qualification to the special
CCB rate to qualification to FTB. It would have been easy to require
the qualification to the special CCB rate to qualification to FTB.
This means a grandparent could not qualify for the special CCB rate
without also being qualified for and in receipt of FTB. Perhaps the
legislators wanted some flexibility to allow payment of the special
CCB rate, even where the claimant wasn’t receiving FTB for the same
child. This might occur where FTB is still being claimed by and paid
to another adult (for example the parent), but the grandparent is the
provider on a daily basis for the child and have substantial autonomy
for day-to-day decisions about the child’s care.
‘Approved’ child care is care provided by a service provider that has
been approved to receive CCB payments on behalf of eligible families.
Most long day care, family day care, before and after school care,
vacation care, some occasional care and some in-home care are ‘approved’
child care providers.
Where a child is in ‘approved’ child care, CCB can be paid to help
with the child care fee charged by the child care centre. Often the
amount of CCB paid is less than the fee charged. The difference, if
any, in the fee charged by an ‘approved’ child care provider and the
maximum CCB paid, is an out-of-pocket expense for the parent.
The amount of CCB that can be paid for ‘approved’ child care depends
on:
-
the number of hours of care used,
-
the individuals CCB percentage, and
-
whether the child is a school child or a non-school child.
All eligible families using ‘approved’ child care can get up to 20
hours of CCB a week. CCB can be claimed for up to 50 hours a week in
‘approved’ child care if the claimant or partner are working or looking
for work, training, studying or exempt from this requirement. CCB can
be claimed for more than 50 hours a week if the claimant or partner
are not available to care for the child for more than 50 hours a week
because of work, study or training commitments (including travel to
and from work).
The proposed special rate of CCB for grandparents in this Bill is only
to be paid in respect of ‘approved’ child care, not ‘registered’ child
care.
‘Registered’ child care is care for work related purposes that is provided
by grandparents, relatives, friends or nannies who are registered with
the Family Assistance Office. ‘Registered’ child care also includes
care provided by some private preschools, kindergartens, some outside
school hours care services and some occasional care centres.
CCB can be claimed for up to 50 hours a week in ‘registered’ child
care if claimant or partner (if have one) are working or looking for
work, training, studying or exempt from this requirement.
Often the amount of CCB paid is less than the ‘registered’ child care
fee charged. The difference, if any, in the fee charged by a ‘registered’
child care provider and the maximum CCB paid, is an out-of-pocket expense
for the parent.
The special rate of CCB for grandparents in this Bill is not proposed
to be paid in respect of ‘registered’ child care.
For CCB purposes, a school child is a child who attends primary or
secondary school. CCB rates for school children are 85 per cent of
the rates for non-school children.
This Bill proposes a new rate of CCB for some grandparents with a child
in ‘approved’ child care, being those where the grandparent is in receipt
of a government income support payment. This is like the current CCB
payment rules, where the family in receipt of a government income support
payment, for example age pension, parenting payment – single, newstart
allowance, the maximum rate of CCB is automatically payable.
This Bill proposes to pay the full child care fee charged by the child
care centre for ‘approved’ child care, where the grandparent is on an
income support payment. It is not proposed to pay the special CCB for
a child in ‘registered’ child care.
There were 22,500 grandparent families with children aged 0-17 years
in Australia in 2003.(22) The ABS Family Characteristic
Survey 2004 presented some other features of grandparents caring
for grandchildren being:
-
These families represented around one percent of all families with
children aged 0-17 years,
-
In the majority of grandparent families (73 per cent), the age
of the youngest child was between 5 and 14 years,
-
In 39% of grandparent families, the younger partner or lone grandparent
was younger than 55 years, while in the majority (61%) of grandparent
families, the younger partner or lone grandparent was aged 55 years
or more,
-
In around one-third (34 per cent) of grandparent families, one
or both grandparents were employed, and 62 per cent received a government
pension, benefit or allowance as their main source of income,
-
Over two-thirds (71 per cent) of the 31,100 children in grandparent
families had their natural parent(s) living elsewhere.(23)
Schedule 5 of the Bill proposes to increase the rate of the
bereavement payment, paid to the surviving partner of a deceased veteran,
where the veteran was paid above 100 per cent of the general rate of
disability pension. This will apply to surviving veterans’ partners
where the veteran was receiving the disability pension paid at the rates
for:
-
-
Special rate (Totally and Permanently Incapacitated (T&PI)
or blinded), and
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment.
The policy of increasing the bereavement payment to surviving partners
of a deceased veteran, where the veteran was paid above 100 per cent
general rate of disability pension, was announced in the 2004 election
campaign. The policy was contained in the Saluting their service
policy platform.(24) The policy platform stated:
Bereavement payments are made to surviving partners to
assist in the transition to one income following the death of a veteran.
For veterans in receipt of the above general rate of the disability
pension, only part of the disability pension is currently included in
this calculation. The Coalition will ensure that the bereavement payment
for eligible dependents of those in receipt of the above general rate
of the disability pension, the most disabled of our veterans, equals
the total pension received by a veteran at the time of his death and
will be paid to the surviving partner for a period of twelve weeks.
The government claimed in their policy platform that the increase in
the bereavement payment would benefit 2,200 surviving partners per year
at a cost of $12.8 million over four years.(25) The Explanatory
Memorandum attached to the Bill estimates the cost for this proposal
at $14.8 million over four years.
There are three separate veterans’ disability pension
payments, paid above the general rate – see above. Each is not payable
concurrently and each has different payment rates.
An explanation of these three higher disability pension
rates is set out below.
The intermediate rate is potentially payable where the veteran is assessed
as having a 70 per cent or more disability (using the assessment for
the general rate) and it also assessed that the veteran is unable to
work for at least 20 hours a week. Section 23 of the VEA sets out the
qualification conditions for the intermediate rate of disability pension.(26)
The intermediate rate is not always payable where the disability assessment
is 70 per cent or more. For example, a veteran may be assessed as having
an 80 per cent disability but may also be able to work for more than
20 hours a week. In this case the intermediate rate is not payable,
only the 80 per cent general rate is paid.
The intermediate rate, in paying a higher rate than the 100 per cent
general rate, recognises the resultant work inability of the veteran
arising from their war caused/related illness/injury, so has a component
for income support. Other than the 20 hours a week test there are a
few other situations where the intermediate rate can be paid, for example
suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis.
The special rate disability pension is commonly referred to as the
Totally and Permanently Incapacitated (T&PI) disability pension.
Section 24 of the VEA sets out the qualification conditions for the
intermediate rate of disability pension.(27)
The special rate works very much like the intermediate rate, but the
incapacity for work test is tougher. The special rate is potentially
payable where the veteran is assessed as having a 70 per cent or more
disability (using the assessment for the general rate). Where the 70
per cent or more is attained, and it also assessed that the veteran
is unable to work for at least 8 hours a week, then the special rate
is payable.
Other than the 8 hours a week test there are a few other situations
where the special rate can be paid, for example where the veteran has
pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Where the veteran has TB, it is assumed
the disability and inability to work requirements are automatically
met and the special rate is paid.
For the special rate, where a veteran has reached 65 years of age,
additional criteria apply. The last paid work, which is precluded by
the incapacity, must have commenced prior to 65 and the veteran must
have been employed in it for at least 10 years. Retired veterans, aged
65 or more, with very severe disabilities, might be entitled to an Extreme
Disablement Adjustment rate – see below.
The Extreme Disablement Adjustment rate disability pension can only
be considered for veterans who have reached 65 years of age and who
are entitled to a disability pension at 100 per cent general rate but
are also not eligible to receive a special rate or intermediate rate
pension. As the veteran is aged 65 or more and no longer of working
age, the inability to work tests for either 20 hours a week (that is
used for intermediate rate) or 8 hours a week (that is used for special
rate) are not applied. Instead a test requiring 70 medical points or
more and at least 6 out of 7 lifestyle points is applied to qualify
for Extreme Disablement Adjustment.
Section 22 of the VEA sets out the qualification conditions for the
Extreme Disablement Adjustment rate of disability pension.(28)
The current general rate of disability pension payable at 100 per cent
is $296.40 per fortnight (pf). The current rates of disability pension
rates paid above the general rate are set out below:
-
Special rate (T&PI, blinded or TTI) - $789.20pf
-
Intermediate rate - $543.40pf
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment (EDA) - $446.90pf
Current bereavement payment rates for disability
pension paid above the general rate
Currently, there is a bereavement payment arrangement where the veteran
receiving disability pension dies. A surviving partner of a disability
pensioner is entitled to a bereavement payment which is a lump sum equal
to 6 fortnightly instalments (that is 12 weeks) of pension at the rate
which was paid prior to death. Bereavement payment is designed to give
the surviving partner an adequate level of income while they make funeral
arrangements, settle financial affairs, perhaps even look for work and
generally sort out their ongoing financial support needs.
However, currently, for those disability pensioners paid above the
100 per cent general disability rate, this twelve week lump sum payment
is confined to a maximum of the 100 per cent disability pension rate.
The lump-sum is not calculated at the rate of disability pension provided
prior to the death of the veteran.
Not all disability pension payment rates, paid above the 100 per cent
of the general rate, are provided for in this Bill to have the bereavement
payment paid to a surviving partner. There are two other disability
pension payment rates paid above the 100 per cent general rate not included.
These are:
-
Special rate of disability pension paid where the veteran is Totally
and Temporarily Incapacitated (T&TI). Section 25 of the VEA
provides for this rate and it is paid at the same rate as the T&PI
Special rate.(29)
-
A higher rate of disability pension where the veteran has a certain
prescribed amputation. Section 27 of the VEA provides for this
rate.(30)
There is no explanation as to why these two disability pension rates
paid at a higher rate than the 100 per cent general rate are not included
in the Bill.
Schedule 1 – utilities allowance
Part 1 Item 4 sets out the qualification requirements and the
payability of UA. See the discussion of this in the background of this
Bills Digest.
Items 5 and 6 sets out the rate and indexation of UA., the details
of which are discussed in the background of this Bills Digest.
Item 8 sets out that a claim for UA is not required and Item
9 that it is to be paid in two instalments.
Part 1 of Schedule 1 places the new provisions for UA into the
SSA. Part 2 of Schedule 1 places the like or equivalent provisions
for the new UA into the VEA.
Item 4 places into the SSA the provisions for the qualification
for seniors concession allowance, the rate of allowance and when payable,
the details of which have been discussed in the background of this Bills
Digest.
Items 8 and 9 provide for the indexation of the rate of the
allowance to the CPI.
Item 13 contains transitional provisions to pay the concession
allowance as a one-off in 2004 in December, notwithstanding the allowance
will be normally provided in March and September of each year.
Part 2 of Schedule 2 places similar provisions into the VEA,
as Part 1 of Schedule 2 did for the SSA, to provide for
the payment of seniors concession allowance.
Item 1 amends the SSA to change the number of hours allowed
away from care to work or study from 20 to 25 hours a week.
Provisions in Schedule 4 amend the FAA to provide for the proposed
special rate CCB for grandparents with a qualifying childs in ‘approved’
child care.
Item 16 defines who is a grandparent, and prescribes eligibility
for the special CCB rate for grandparents. Item 17 presents
provisions for requirements to provide information and action to deny
payment on failure to provide information. These are very like existing
provisions elsewhere in the act for other like claims for assistance.
Items 41 and 42 stops ‘approved child’ care centres from setting
extraordinary fees for persons otherwise entitled to the special CCB
rate for grandparents, thereby taking advantage of the fact the special
CCB rate will cover 100 per cent of the rate charged. A child care
centre may set higher than normal fees for child care, knowing the proposed
special CCB rate for ‘approved’ child care will cover 100 per cent of
the cost. This is intended to stop this type of exploitation of the
new arrangements.
Item 1 amends the VEA to provide for the payment of the bereavement
payment, payable to the surviving partner of certain disability pension
recipients, at the same rate as if the pensioner did not die. Item
1 makes this amendment in respect of:
-
-
Special rate (T&PI, blinded or T&TI), and
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment.
Item 3 provides that the disability pension bereavement amount
paid will be the same as the disability pension rate paid as if the
pensioner had not died.
All of the proposed initiatives presented in this Bill are beneficial.
For Schedule 1, the proposed UA is only to be provided to the
retired age on a government income support pension.
For Schedule 2, the proposed seniors concession allowance, it
is to be provided only to those self-funded referees not on a government
pension but entitled to a CSHC.
The special rate CCB proposed in Schedule 4 that is to be paid
to grandparents, is very beneficial proposing to cover to 100 per cent
the child care costs in ‘approved’ child care. It may be considered
discriminatory as it does not provide the same assistance to other like
older aged adults caring for young children, who are not a grandparent
in similar situations, for example a great aunty or other non-related
older aged adult.
The changes to the bereavement arrangements for veterans’ disability
pension presented in Schedule 5 could be seen to be addressing
an anomaly in the current arrangements. However, there still are other
disability pension rates paid, at more than 100 per cent general rate,
which will not benefit from the Schedule 5 reforms.
-
Invalidity service pension is payable under the VEA to a veteran
who has qualifying war service and is aged less than 65 and is unable
to work at full award wages for at least 8 hours a week. Qualifying
war service in the VEA means has served in operations against the
enemy whilst in danger from hostile forces of the enemy.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Recognising
senior Australians – their needs and their carers, Liberal
Party of Australia, 2004 election policy platform, 1 October 2004.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Recognising
senior Australians – their needs and their carers, op. cit.,
p. 4.
-
ibid.
-
| Date of Birth |
Females qualify for
age pension at |
| 1 July 1935 to 31 December
1936 |
60.5 |
| 1 January 1937 to 30 June
1938 |
61 |
| 1 July 1938 to 31 December
1939 |
61.5 |
| 1 January 1940 to 30 June
1941 |
62 |
| 1 July 1941 to 31 December
1942 |
62.5 |
| 1 January 1943 to 30 June
1944 |
63 |
| 1 July 1944 to 31 December
1945 |
63.5 |
| 1 January 1946 to 30 June
1947 |
64 |
| 1 July 1947 to 31 December
1948 |
64.5 |
| 1 January 1949 and later |
65 |
-
| Date of Birth |
Females qualify for
service pension at |
| 1 July 1943 to 31 December
1944 |
56.5 |
| 1 January 1945 to 30
June 1946 |
57 |
| 1 July 1946 to 31 December
1947 |
57.5 |
| 1 January 1948 to 30
June 1949 |
58 |
| 1 July 1949 to 31 December
1950 |
58.5 |
| 1 January 1951 to 30
June 1952 |
59 |
| 1 July 1952 to 31 December
1953 |
59.5 |
| 1 January 1954 and later |
60 |
-
Self-funded retires referred to in this Digest are those of retired
age (that is aged 55 or more) but not on a government income support
payment due to income or assets.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Recognising
senior Australians – their needs and their carers, op. cit.,
pp. 4-5.
-
ibid.
-
ibid.
-
Senator the Hon. Amanda Vanstone (Minister for Family and Community
Services), Further assistance for older Australians, media
release, Parliament House, Canberra, 29 July 2001.
-
Senator the Hon. Kaye Patterson (Minister for Family and Community
Services), Labor
states and territories snub self-funded retirees, media
release, Parliament House, Canberra, 28 July 2004.
-
ibid.
-
Peter Yeend, 1998 Budget Measures Legislation Amendment (Social
Security and Veterans' Entitlements) Bill 1998, Bills Digest
No. 21 1998-99, Department of Parliamentary Library, 1998-99.
-
Nathan Hancock and Dale Daniels, Family and Community Services
and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Further Assistance
for Older Australians) Bill 2001, Bills
Digest No. 18 2001-02, Department of Parliamentary Library,
2001-02.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Recognising
senior Australians – their needs and their carers, op. cit.,
p. 6.
-
ibid.
-
Sub-section 198(2) of the Social Security Act 1991.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Extra
Assistance for Families, Liberal Party of Australia, 2004 election
policy platform, p. 4.
-
ibid.
-
ibid.
-
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Family
Characteristics Australia, Catalogue No. 4442.0, 22 September
2004, p. 40.
-
ibid.
-
T he Hon. Mr John Howard, MP, Saluting
their service, Liberal Party of Australia, 2004 election
policy platform, 4 October 2004, p. 5.
-
ibid.
-
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, section 23, Intermediate
rate of pension.
-
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, section 24, Special
rate of pension.
-
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, section 22, Extreme
Disablement Adjustment.
-
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, section 27, Temporary
payment at special rate.
-
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, section 27, Increased
rates of pension in certain circumstances.
Peter Yeend
1 December 2004
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament
using information available at the time of production. The views expressed
do not reflect an official position of the Information and Research Service,
nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the
public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2004
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their
official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2004.

|