Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note Index

Research Note no. 25 2005–06

Net Family Tax Benefit 2004–05 to 2006–07

Leslie Nielson
Economics, Commerce and Industrial Relations Section
23 March 2006

Recently there has been some interest in the Net Family Tax Benefit received by families at certain levels of income.(1) This interest has, in part, been sparked by recent comments by the Treasurer about the possible policy concerns that may have to be addressed in the 2006–07 Federal Budget.(2) Further, there has been some concern that the current system for the payment of Family Tax Benefit is already generous, and may not warrant further changes to increase benefits paid.(3) This point appears to have been acknowledged by the Treasurer.(4)

This Research Note seeks to provide additional background on these matters by illustrating the overall position of a particular family type after tax has been paid and some government benefits have been received.

Net Family Tax Benefit

Net Family Tax Benefit (NFTB) is the overall position of a family once the amount of tax and Medicare Levy has been offset by the amount of Family Tax Benefit (FTB),(5) Child Care Benefit (CCB)(6) and, if appropriate, Rent Assistance (RA),(7) has been taken into account. The Net Family Tax Benefit can be positive or negative. A positive NFTB is where the amount of benefits received exceeds the amount of tax paid. A negative NFTB is where the amount of tax paid exceeds the benefits received.

Basis of calculations

Family type

The following tables show the net family tax benefit for the following family type:

  • a couple, with one wage earner, the other partner living at home
  • two children, one aged 5 the other aged 8
  • the family claim 20 hours a week child care, and
  • in one set of tables the family are assumed to be homeowners. In the other table the family is assumed to be in rental accommodation, and receiving rent assistance at the maximum possible rate.

Modelling was undertaken for a single income earner to illustrate the impact of changes in rates of FTB, tax and CCB on a family type that qualifies for the full range of these benefits.

Benefits received

This family claims the FTB A & B, as well as CCB and where appropriate RA. The rate of FTB received includes the FTB lump sums payable in various years.

The family on the lowest wage level in these calculations ($25 200 p.a.) is also entitled to parenting payment (PP). However, families on the other wage levels for which these calculations were undertaken are not eligible for PP. To preserve a constant basis for comparison across all wage levels, these calculations have not included PP in the benefits received for the family on the lowest yearly income.

Wages received

In the following tables the wages for the family are as follows:

  • $25 200 p.a. (current minimum wage)
  • $30 000 p.a., $40 000 p.a., $45 000 p.a., $50 000 p.a.
  • $53 144 (average weekly ordinary time earnings for August 2005), and
  • $55 000 p.a. and $60 000 p.a.

In addition, the breakeven point for net family tax benefit has calculated for each year. The breakeven point is where the amount of benefits received roughly equals the amount of tax paid. The figures in bold note the calculated breakeven point in each year.

These yearly wage levels have not been discounted back in each year, as this enables a comparison of net tax benefits at these wage levels across all years for which calculations have been done.

Calculation method

These calculations were undertaken by the STINMOD 04A package, from the National Centre for Economic and Social Modelling at the University of Canberra. The assumptions and calculations underlying the simulation results were prepared by the author and the responsibility for the use and interpretation of these data is entirely that of the author.

Limitations on results

The following tables show the net family tax benefit from the 2003–04 to the 2006–07 financial years. The figures from 2005–06 years onwards are only estimates due to:

  • the exact family Medicare Levy thresholds are not known until after the close of the financial year in question. The estimates for these years uses the current thresholds
  • likewise, the extent of the low income earners rebate is unknown for these years, as the rate of this tax offset and the income levels at which it begins to apply are also not known until after the close of the relevant financial year,
  • further, the exact FTB rates and income test thresholds are also not known until after the end of the relevant financial year. The STINMOD package estimate these rates based on assumptions about inflation and wages growth
  • the 30 per cent tax offset for ‘out of pocket’ child care expenses has also not been included, as these expenses will be different for each particular family and are not accurately known until after the close of the financial year, and
  • social security payments for the 2005–06 and 2006–07 years are estimated based on assumed rates of growth in AWOTE and the CPI.

Further, estimates of the breakeven point, at which this particular family do not have a net tax benefit (i.e. their net tax benefit is $0) are within a $4 range of accuracy, due to the difficulty of exactly calculating the family income at which this effect occurs. This point is often called the net tax threshold.(8)

Interpreting the tables

As noted above, in the following tables a positive figure notes the amount by which the benefits received exceed the tax paid. A negative figure notes the amount by which the tax paid exceeds the benefits received. A negative figure can be taken as the effective amount of tax paid after the receipt of these benefits have been taken into account.

Home owners

The following tables give the net tax benefits for a family from 2004–05 to 2006–07.

Table 1: Home owner net family tax benefit 2006–07

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 420

0

91

3 329

11 980

5 552

14 203

30 000

4 860

0

0

4 860

11 980

5 552

12 672

35 000

6 360

525

0

6 885

11 980

5 552

10 647

40 000

7 860

600

0

8 460

11 483

5 236

8 259

45 000

9 360

675

0

10 035

10 484

4 976

5 426

50 000

10 860

750

0

11 610

9 475

4 713

2 579

53 144

11 803

797

0

12 600

8 140

4 551

91

53 300

11 850

800

0

12 649

8 109

4 543

0

55 000

12 360

825

0

13 185

8 477

4 453

-254

60 000

13 860

900

0

14 760

7 479

4 193

-3 088

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD

Table 2: Home owner net family tax benefit 2005–06

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 420

0

91

3 329

11 775

6 087

14 534

30 000

4 860

0

0

4 860

11 775

6 087

13 003

35 000

6 360

525

0

6 885

11 447

5 935

10 499

40 000

7 860

600

0

8 460

10 447

5 528

7 516

45 000

9 360

675

0

10 035

9 447

5 120

4 533

50 000

10 860

750

0

11 610

8 447

4 712

1 550

52 225

11 527

783

0

12 310

7 883

4 424

0

55 000

12 360

825

0

13 185

7 327

4 280.12

-1 577

60 000

13 860

900

0

14 760

6 928

3 896.81

-3 935

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD

Table 3: Home owner net family tax benefit 2004–05

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 732

0

91

3 641

11 330

5 307

12 996

30 000

5 172

0

0

5 172

11 330

5 307

11 465

35 000

6 672

525

0

7 197

10 827

5 176

8 806

40 000

8 172

600

0

8 772

9 827

4 915

5 970

45 000

9 672

675

0

10 347

8 827

4 654

3 134

50 000

11 172

750

0

11 922

7 827

4 393

299

50 530

11 331

758

0

12 089

7 721

4 366

0

53 144

12 115

797

0

12 912

7 198

4 230

-1 484

55 000

12 672

825

0

13 497

6 827

4 133

-2 537

60 000

14 412

900

0

15 312

6 607

3 872

-4 833

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD

Non-home owners

The following tables show the net tax benefit for a family in rental accommodation between 2004–05 and 2006–07. The only difference between the home-owner and non-home owner results is that the non-home owners receive rental assistance.

Table 4: Non-home owner net family tax benefit 2006–07

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 420

0

91

3 329

15 070

5 552

17 293

30 000

4 860

0

0

4 860

15 070

5 552

15 762

35 000

6 360

525

0

6 885

15 070

5 552

13 737

40 000

7 860

600

0

8 460

14 572

5 236

11 349

45 000

9 360

675

0

10 035

13 574

4 976

8 516

50 000

10 860

750

0

11 610

12 565

4 713

5 669

53 144

11 803

797

0

12 600

11 230

4 551

3 181

55 000

12 360

825

0

13 185

11 567

4 453

2 836

60 000

13 860

900

0

14 760

10 568

4 193

0

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD

Table 5: Non-home owner net family tax benefit 2005–06

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 420

0

91

3 329

14 770

6 087

17 529

30 000

4 860

0

0

4 860

14 770

6 087

15 998

35 000

6 360

525

0

6 885

14 442

5 935

13 494

40 000

7 860

600

0

8 460

13 442

5 528

10 511

45 000

9 360

675

0

10 035

12 442

5 120

7 528

50 000

10 860

750

0

11 610

11 442

4 712

4 545

53 293

11 847

799

0

12 647

10 783

4 443

2 580

55 000

12 360

825

0

13 185

10 382

4 279

1 477

57 540

13 122

863

0

13 985

9 833

4 147.52

0

60 000

13 860

900

0

14 760

9 341

4 019.60

-1 399

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD

Table 6: Non-home owner net family tax benefit 2004–05

Annual Salary
$

Tax Liability
$

Medicare
$

Low Income Rebate
$

Net Tax
$

Family Tax Benefit
$

Child Care
$

NFTB
$

25 200

3 732

0

91

3 641

14 280

5 307

15 946

30 000

5 172

0

0

5 172

14 280

5 307

14 415

35 000

6 672

525

0

7 197

13 777

5 176

11 756

40 000

8 172

600

0

8 772

12 777

4 915

8 920

45 000

9 672

675

0

10 347

11 777

4 654

6 084

50 000

11 172

750

0

11 922

10 777

4 393

3 249

53 144

12 115

797

0

12 912

10 148

4 230

1 466

55 000

12 672

825

0

13 497

9 777

4 133

413

55 729

12 890

836

0

13 726

9 631

4 095

0

60 000

14 412

900

0

15 312

8 778

3 872

-2 662

Source: Parliamentary Library and STINMOD


Longer term changes

The following table shows the changes in the real breakeven point (otherwise known as the Net Tax Threshold (NTT)) for different family types. The assumed wages are expressed as a percentage of the then Average Weekly Ordinary Time Earnings (AWOTE) calculated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For example, in the following table a person having an income expressed as ‘(100%)’ means that their income is equal to AWOTE in that year. The families in this table are assumed to have two children, one aged 3 and the other 8 years. All values are in 2005–06 dollars.

Table 7: Increases in real net tax thresholds (NTT) for families 1996 to 2006-07

Family type and income

Household wages in 2006–07
 $

NTT 1996–97
 $

NTT 2006–07
 $

Per cent change

Sole parent (0%)

0

34 502

44 951

30.3

Single Income Couple (100%)

55 300

33 931

44 951

32.5

Source: Budget Paper No.1 2005–06, p. 5–16

The reasons why

There are a number of changes which may have contributed to the increase in the breakeven point or NTT, namely,

  • increase in value of family payments
  • increases in income tax thresholds
  • the liberalisation of income tests for family payments, pensions and allowances, and
  • the introduction of, and increases in, the value of several tax offsets.(9)

These factors have contributed to substantial increases in assistance to families since 1996–97. Further, the increase in real wages, and the subsequent rise in the real value of pensions, also increased the welfare of families over this period.(10)

  1. L. Tingle, ‘Trend to welfare state alarming’, Australian Financial Review, 12 January 2006, p. 6, and E. Colman, ‘Tax slug on poor singles’, Weekend Australian, 14 January 2006, pp. 1,6, and Peter Martin, ‘No tax but they’re not happy, Pete’, Sydney Morning Herald, 18 January 2006, p. 11.
  2. The Hon. P. Costello, Treasurer, Doorstop Interview, Treasury Place, Melbourne, 8 January 2006.
  3. E. Colman and J. Riley, ‘Nats press Costello on tax reform’, Australian, 12 January 2006, p. 1.
  4. F. Anderson and S. Morris, ‘Parents already getting plenty, Costello says’, Australian Financial Review, 17 January 2006, p. 3.
  5. Family Tax Benefit Part A is an annual payment to help families with the cost of raising children A person may receive this payment have a dependent child under 21 (including a foster child), or have a dependent full time student aged 21 to 24, and have income under a certain amount, and are living in Australia (that is, Australia is their permanent home), and they are either an Australian citizen, a New Zealand citizen, the holder of a permanent visa or the holder of certain temporary visas. Family Tax Benefit Part B gives extra assistance to families with one main income, including sole parents, where the youngest dependent child is under 16 (or up to 18 if they are a full time student and do not receive Youth Allowance or a similar payment). It also gives extra assistance to families who have a child under the age of five.
  6. Child Care Benefit is a payment for the cost of child care for long day care, family day care, occasional care, outside school hours care, vacation care and registered care.
  7. Rent assistance is a payment for low income earners renting accommodation in the private rental market.
  8. K. Bremner, ‘Net tax thresholds for Australian Families’, Treasury Economic Round-up, Winter 2005, Canberra, 1 September 2005, p. 41.
  9. Bremner, ibid., p. 40.
  10. Pennsions are indexed to the greater of increases in either the Consumer Price Index or the Male Total Average Weekly Earnings (MTAWE). As MATAWE has increased at a faster rate than the CPI, pensions have increased in real terms.
 

For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.

top