![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1975 |
2001 |
Change |
|||||
|
Earnings |
('000) |
% |
('000) |
% |
('000) |
||
|
High |
743.3 |
17.5 |
1319.3 |
25.2 |
576.0 |
||
|
Middle to high |
477.2 |
11.3 |
586.7 |
11.2 |
109.4 |
||
|
Middle |
2131.3 |
50.3 |
1902.7 |
36.4 |
-228.6 |
||
|
Middle to low |
558.1 |
13.2 |
936.8 |
17.9 |
378.7 |
||
|
Low |
327.8 |
7.7 |
483.7 |
9.2 |
155.9 |
||
|
Total |
4237.7 |
100.0 |
5229.1 |
100.0 |
991.4 |
||
The trend toward a decline in the proportion of middle paid employees, while the proportion of those on high incomes and middle to low and low incomes has increased, has been associated with a general trend toward relatively higher wages for the highly skilled, and lower wages for the less skilled. The result has been an ever widening wage dispersion in Australia.
Occupational Change
Occupational shifts are central to an explanation of the disappearance of middle income employees in Australia.
Since 1986(1) a number of occupational groups have decreased in size as measured by their full-time employee numbers. These groups are tradespersons and related workers (down 35 000), advanced clerical and sales workers (down 54 000), elementary clerical, sales and service workers (down 20 000) and labourers and related workers (down 62 000). In other words, the occupational groups to have declined in number are predominantly those in which employees are middle or low paid. All other occupational groups have increased in number, especially the highly paid managers and professional groups, which have grown by more than one million persons over the period.
Borland(2) has identified a number of underlying economic factors that explain this shift in demand, from relatively low skilled to relatively high skilled employees. They are:
'Disappearing Middle' or 'Growing Top'
The disappearing middle implies that certain middle paid jobs have simply ceased to exist. This would appear, however, to be in part true but also in part illusory. As discussed, the hollowing out of middle paid jobs has been accompanied by very strong growth in high paid jobs but only modest growth in middle to low paid jobs. In other words, another phenomenon strongly at work in the Australian economy is that of a growing top, the effect of which has been to pull up median earnings and thus change the distribution of jobs around this raised median. Many jobs that were formerly in the middle therefore, have not disappeared as such, but have simply fallen back, relative to median earnings. This would explain why middle paid jobs have decreased their job share, while middle to low paid jobs have increased.
The influence of the growing top on the disappearance of middle income earners can be illustrated with the example of automotive tradespersons. In 1987, the mean weekly earnings(3) of a full-time employed automotive tradesperson was $400 compared with $461 for all full-time employees. The average automotive tradesperson in 1987 would therefore have been defined as middle-paid since earnings were within the range of 80 to 120 per cent of the mean for all full-time employees. By 2000, however, an automotive tradesperson was earning $630 compared with $838 for all full-time employees, well outside the range that would have defined the average automotive tradesperson as middle-paid.
Conclusion
The trend towards a decline in the number of middle paid employees, combined with an increase in the demand for highly skilled employees, is therefore well established in Australia. These influences have resulted in increased wage dispersion, a tendency that is likely to continue if the demand for highly skilled employees continues to rise.