 |
Research Note no. 31 2002-03
Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Australia
Moira Coombs
Law and Bills Digest Group
Laura Rayner
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Group
11 April 2003
1901 to Vietnam
Almost
from Federation, Australia recognised the validity of conscientious
objection (CO) to military service. 'Australia's Defence Act 1903
was the first national legislation to grant total exemption from military
service on the grounds of conscientious belief '(1) for those
who could prove that the 'doctrines of their religion forbade them to
bear arms or perform military service'.(2)
Over
time, legal recognition of CO has developed and moved away from that
based on religious belief to more secular attitudes. In 1910, the Defence
Act was amended to remove the reference to religion and referred instead
to persons being able to satisfy the prescribed authority that their
conscientious beliefs did not allow them to bear arms.(3)
However, CO did not apply to the universal compulsory military training
scheme that operated between 1911 and 1929 for males aged 12 to 26 years.(4)
Those who objected, including the fathers of minors, faced fines and/or
gaol. Some boys suffered solitary confinement in Army gaols.(5)
As there
was no conscription during WWI (two referenda supporting the introduction
of conscription were defeated), the application of the law relating
to actual combat service remained untested until the following war.
Conscription
was introduced during WWII for service within Australia but the area
of service was extended to the southwest Pacific zone in 1943.(6)
The Defence Act (No 2) 1939 broadened the definition of 'conscientious'
to include all beliefs, not just religious beliefs or doctrine, thus
allowing members of a non-pacifist church to hold pacifist views as
individuals. About one per cent of all conscripts applied for CO exemptions,
and a quarter of these were rejected. Most successful applicants performed
non-combatant duties or civil work.(7)
Vietnam
Similar
CO provisions existed in the National Service Act 1951. When
the new national service scheme was introduced in 1964, Prime Minister
Menzies argued that conscripts would be obliged to serve overseas as
necessary. The courts clarified the definition of CO as having to be
'deep-seated and compelling'.(8) Between 1965 and 1971, 733
men were granted total exemption, 142 were exempted from combat duties
and 137 had their applications rejected.(9)
The Gulf War and the 1992 Act
The concept
of selective conscientious objection (SCO), i.e. objection
to a war or warlike operation, developed during the 1960s with some
successful claims made during the Vietnam War. A private member's bill
to amend CO provisions in the National Service Act introduced in 1983
was subsequently referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional
and Legal Affairs. The Committees report Conscientious Objection
to Conscripted Military Service recommended
that a framework for CO be incorporated into a National Service Bill.
In addition, it
recommended the recognition of specific conscientious belief 'so as to grant
exemption from participation in a particular military conflict where
to be compelled by law to do so would violate the individual's sense
of personal integrity'.(10)
The Gulf
War in 1990 brought these issues sharply into focus, and the recommendations
of the Committee were incorporated into the Defence Legislation Amendment
Act 1992. The essential changes included the recognition of conscientious
objection to particular conflicts and the requirement that prior parliamentary
approval of conscription be obtained. The Act contains procedures to
be followed by persons wanting to make a claim.
Current Legal Situation
CO and
SCO are available to persons conscripted to serve in the ADF. CO is
available to volunteers in the defence force during peacetime by administrative
practice, that is applying for discharge from the ADF. SCO is not available
at present to volunteers.(11)
Under
the Act, a conscript is exempt from service in time of war
if he/she holds conscientious beliefs that do not allow them to participate
in war or they
hold such beliefs in relation to a particular conflict (s. 61A(1)(h)
and (i) ). Exemption from combatant duties is possible under
s. 61A (1A). A conscientious belief is defined in the Defence Act
1903 s. 4 as something that:
-
involves a fundamental
conviction of what is morally right and morally wrong, whether or
not based on religious considerations; and
-
is so compelling in character for that person that he or she is duty bound to
espouse it; and
-
is likely to be of a long standing
nature.
In wartime,
conscription is introduced by proclamation of the Governor-General.
It is laid before Parliament 90 days before it comes into effect and
requires the approval of both Houses (s. 60)
. If compulsory military service is instituted then a
person who claims exemption on the ground of conscientious belief can
have his/her claim determined by a Conscientious Objection Tribunal.
A person must apply to the Secretary of the Department of Defence within
seven days of being called upon. (s. 61CA).
CO Tribunals
The Minister
of Defence can establish tribunals as and when necessary by a notice
in the Commonwealth Government Gazette. Each tribunal comprises a presiding
member, who is a legal practitioner of not less than seven years standing
(s. 61CF)
and
two other members.
Tribunal
procedures are to be informal, quick, fair, just and economical, in
accordance with substantial justice and the merits of the case. Tribunals
are not bound by technicalities, legal forms or the rules of evidence, although they
have the power to take evidence on oath or affirmation, or to summons
persons to give evidence or produce documents (s. 61CQ).
Subject
to Part IV of the Act and the rights of appeal, Tribunal determinations
are final and binding for all purposes (s. 61CC).
Tribunals are required to notify applicants of their determinations
as soon as possible and to provide a written statement of reasons within
28 days of the determination being made.
(s.
61CE)
Appeal Mechanisms
A party
may apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to have a determination
of a tribunal reviewed (s. 61 CZB).
There is opportunity for further appeal to the Federal Court on a question
of law only and this jurisdiction is exercised by the Full Court (s. 61CZD).
United States of America
Under
the Military Selective Service Act 50 App USC s.
456 (j) no person is required to be subject to combatant training and
service in the armed forces, 'who by reason of religious training and
belief, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form'.
Political, sociological or philosophical views are not included. The
Supreme Court, however, has expanded the criteria for conscientious
objector status from religious to non-religious, moral or ethical objection.(12)
A member
of the armed forces may seek either separation or assignment to non-combatant
duties for reasons of conscientious objection. This is achieved by administrative
discharge and is discretionary within the military service concerned.(13)
The President can also suspend promotions, retirements and discharges
if he determines it is essential to the national security of the United
States.(14)
United Kingdom
The Human
Rights Act 1998 implements the European Convention on Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms. Article 9 guarantees the 'right to freedom of
thought, conscience and religion'.
The Advisory
Committee on Conscientious Objectors (ACCO), set up in 1970, advises
on all conscientious objection claims to further service from Service
personnel on grounds of conscience that have not been accepted by Service
authorities.(15)
The House
of Lords moved an amendment to the Reserve Forces Bill 1996 to include
'discharge on the grounds of conscience'. However, the government considered
it unnecessary as long established procedures involving the ACCO existed.(16)
New Zealand
There
is no mention of CO in the Defence Act. However, the Bill of Rights
1990 s. 13 guarantees freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
Conclusion
Trends since WWI indicate a move to an increasing
recognition of CO to military service.(17) No doubt this
has been influenced by 'new developments in political and ethical thought'(18)
and the 20th
century experiences of global conflicts.
-
Hugh Smith, 'Conscience, Law and the State: Australia's
Approach to Conscientious Objection since 1901' Australian Journal
of Politics and History, vol. 35, no. 1, 1989, p. 13.
-
Defence Act 1903, s. 61.
-
Defence Act 1910, s. 7 repealed the existing
s. 61 and replaced it.
-
Krygger v. Williams (1912) 15 CLR 366 Barton
J at p. 372.
-
John Barrett 'Falling in: Australians and "Boy
Conscription" 1911–1915' 1979, especially chapter 5, p.
170 ff.
-
Peter Dennis et al., The Oxford Companion to
Australian Military History, p. 177.
-
Hugh Smith, op. cit., p. 17.
-
ibid., p. 20 referring to High Court decisions
in Regina v. District Court; ex parte White 116 CLR 644 and Wright
v. Min for Labour and National Service (1969) 14 FLR 91 and others.
-
Peter Dennis, op. cit., p. 174.
-
Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional
and Legal Affairs, Conscientious Objection to Conscripted Military
Service, 1985, p. ix.
-
Ian Wing, 'Selective Conscientious Objection
and the Australian Defence Force' Australian Defence Force Journal,
no. 137 July–August 1999, p. 36.
-
Charles C. Moskos and John Whiteclay, Chambers
II editors, The New Conscientious Objection from sacred to secular
resistance, p. 42.
-
US Department of Defense Directive Number 1300.6,
20 August 1971.
-
10 USCA, s. 12305. For more information on CO
in the US see www.objector.org.
-
Advisory Committee on Conscientious Objectors
www.mod.uk/issues/open_government/ndpbs.htm#_The Advisory_Committee.
-
Reserve Forces Bill, House of Lords Debates,
30 January 1996.
-
For instance in the US 64 700 men claimed CO
status in WWI. In Vietnam over 170,000 were classified as CO between
1965 and 1970 in Oxford Companion to American Military History, p.
179–180.
-
ibid, p. 180.
|
 |