![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Annual Report 2001–02 You are currently viewing: Annual
report > Management and Accountability
Operational initiativesPeopleSoft rollout statusThe rollout to all staff of the employee self-service and time and attendance modules of PeopleSoft, the departments personnel records software, was completed during financial year 200102. The time and attendance module is an intranet based time recording system; the information it generates allows the department to allocate costs very accurately to departmental outputs. The employee self-service module allows staff to view their pay slips and leave balances, to apply for leave online and to amend their personal details. The department continued to email pay slips to staff. Financial resourcesA number of significant changes were made to the staffing and operations of the Finance Office in 200102. The significant internal control issues identified by the ANAO in its audit of financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2001 (as discussed in the external scrutiny section above) were addressed. As reported in the 200001 annual report, the departments financial management information system (FMIS) was not fully meeting the departments needs. Following an extensive assessment process, the department decided to acquire Oracle Financials as its new FMIS. Acquisition of the new FMIS was proceeding at the end of the 200102 financial year and the implementation of the new system will be reported on in the 200203 annual report. Information technologyThe majority of the departments information technology assets were due for replacement in 200102. The election break provided an opportunity for the department to plan, test and begin to implement an information technology asset replacement strategy. The desktop personal computers allocated to departmental staff were due for replacement early in the financial year, but purchase of replacement hardware was postponed until a recommended specification for hardware was made for the forthcoming upgrade of the Parliament House software platform. Following that recommendation in January 2002, all personal computers in the department were replaced in preparation for the introduction of the new software platform. Records managementDeakin Consulting Proprietary Limited reviewed the departments records management processes and systems and presented a report to the Executive in May 2002. The review, which analysed the efficiency and effectiveness of the existing records management processes, made a number of recommendations and developed an action plan. The action plan, which extends to 2004, covers improvements to existing processes and the piloting of an electronic document management system. The action plan is being considered by the Executive. In April 2001 the department began a review of its administrative records from 1927 to 1970 to determine which records should be destroyed, archived or preserved because of their historical significance. The review is due to be finalised in mid-2003. PurchasingIn 200102 all goods and services were purchased in accordance with statutory and departmental guidelines, in particular the Chief Executives Instructions (CEIs). Most purchasing decisions devolved to business units are based on appropriate delegations under the FMA Act, allowing business units to be more responsive to demands on their business and also increasing managers responsibility for financial matters, especially in terms of value for money. Corporate areas such as Finance and Information Technology also provide financial advice to business units, supplementing the guidelines in the CEIs. Further advice is provided on an ad hoc basis by the Joint House Department, which has an accredited procurement and contracts unit. Table 12 provides information about key performance indicators (KPIs) for purchasing.
BankingIn 200102 the parliamentary departments tendered for transactional banking services and the Reserve Bank of Australia was the successful tenderer. Joint tendering by the parliamentary departments allowed the Department of the House of Representatives to obtain the best value for the comparatively low level of transactions that it processes. You are currently viewing: Annual
report > Management and Accountability
|