Chapter 10 - Debate
Relevance
In speaking to a question a senator may not digress from its subject
matter (SO 194).
This rule of relevance is interpreted liberally, so as to give senators
the maximum freedom in debate. If a senator appears to be speaking irrelevantly
to the question, the senator should be given the opportunity to show how the
remarks in question relate to that subject (ruling of President Brown, SD, 5/10/1950, p. 333).
The rule is subject
to the proviso that on the motion for the address-in-reply to the
Governor-General’s speech (see Chapter 7, Meetings of the Senate, under
Address-in-reply), any matter may be discussed. The rule also does not apply to
debates in which, under the standing orders, any matter may be discussed,
including debate on the motion for the adjournment of the Senate (SO 53(4)) and debate on
the motion for the first reading of a bill which the Senate may not amend
(SO 112(2)).
Closely related to
the rule of relevance is the rule against tedious repetition. The chair may call
the attention of the Senate to continued irrelevance or tedious repetition and may direct a
senator to discontinue a speech, but that senator
may require that the question whether the senator be further heard be
immediately put to the Senate and determined without debate (SO 196). Because of the
time limits applying to debates, the standing order is seldom invoked.
Previous page | Contents | Next page
Website feedback: web.senate@aph.gov.au
Last reviewed 2 February 2010 by the Senate Web Administrator
© Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament of Australia Web Site Privacy Statement
Images courtesy of AUSPIC
|
