73. Rules for questions
(1) |
The following rules shall apply to questions: |
questions shall not contain: |
(a) |
statements of fact or names of persons unless they are strictly
necessary to render the question intelligible and can be
authenticated; |
(b) |
arguments; |
(c) |
inferences; |
(d) |
imputations; |
(e) |
epithets; |
(f) |
ironical expressions; or |
(g) |
hypothetical matter; |
questions shall not ask: |
(h) |
for an expression of opinion; |
(i) |
for a statement of the government ’s policy; or |
(j) |
for legal opinion; |
questions shall not refer to: |
(k) |
debates in the current session; or |
(l) |
proceedings in committee not reported to the Senate. |
(2) |
Questions shall not anticipate discussion upon an order of the
day or other matter which appears on the Notice Paper.
|
(3) |
The President may direct that the language of a
question be changed if it is not in conformity with the standing
orders. |
(4) |
In answering a question, a senator shall not debate it.
|
74. Questions on notice
(1) |
Notice of a question shall be given by a senator signing and
delivering it to the Clerk, fairly written, printed, or typed.
Notice may be given by one senator on behalf of another.
|
(2) |
The Clerk shall place notices of questions on the
Notice Paper in the order in which they are received. |
(3) |
The reply to a question on notice shall be given by
delivering it to the Clerk, a copy shall be supplied to the senator
who asked the question, the publication of the reply is then
authorised, and the question and reply shall be printed in
Hansard. |
(4) |
A senator who has received a copy of a reply pursuant to this
standing order may, by leave, immediately after questions without
notice, ask the question and have the reply read in the Senate.
|
(5) |
If a minister does not answer a question on notice
asked by a senator within 30 days of the asking of that question,
or if a question taken on notice during a hearing of a legislative
and general purpose standing committee considering estimates
remains unanswered 30 days after the day set for answering the
question, and a minister does not, within that period, provide to
the senator who asked the question an explanation satisfactory to
that senator of why an answer has not yet been provided: |
(a) |
at the conclusion of question time on any day after that
period, the senator may ask the relevant minister for such an
explanation; and |
(b) |
the senator may, at the conclusion of the explanation, move
without notice – That the Senate take note of the
explanation; or |
(c) |
in the event that the minister does not provide an explanation,
the senator may, without notice, move a motion with regard to the
minister’s failure to provide either an answer or an
explanation. |
Senate Table Office
As at 29 January 2009
Back to top