![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statutory Levy |
Levy rates |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cattle (per kg HCW) |
Marketing |
$0.002 |
| R&D |
$0.004 |
|
| Sheep (per head) |
Marketing |
$0.060 |
| R&D |
$0.090 |
|
| Lamb (per head) |
Marketing |
$0.070 |
| R&D |
$0.090 |
|
| Goats (per head) |
Marketing |
$0.030 |
| R&D |
$0.070 |
|
The result of the ballot was 72.5% in favour, 26.6% against.
Selected meat industry statistics are presented in the following tables.

Source: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Commodity Statistics 2006, p. 157.

Source: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Commodity Statistics 2006, p. 160.

Source: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Food Statistics 2006, p. 54.
The Explanatory Memorandum states that the proposals in the bill will not result in additional Commonwealth expenditure, and that existing industry and Commonwealth structures will be used to collect and disburse the funds involved, namely the levy proceeds and matching Commonwealth contributions. The latter reflect the standard long-term arrangements for Commonwealth support of agricultural R&D, whereby the proceeds of industry levies are matched dollar-for-dollar up to a limit of 0.5 per cent of the annual gross value of production for the red-meat industry. This limit is set under subsection 66(3) of the AMLI Act and will not change. Further, the matching funds are for agreed research projects managed by MLA.
Associated administrative costs to the Commonwealth will be met from the levies on a fee-for-service basis.(3)
Item 4 empowers the Minister to declare a body to be the meat processor marketing body or the meat processor research body. These declarations will be disallowable by either House of Parliament in the usual manner. Item 6 enables the same body to perform both the marketing and research functions for the meat-processing sector, but a body may not represent sectors of the red-meat industry other than its own (item 7). There can be only one research body and one marketing body (item 8).
Item 10 outlines the pre-conditions for declaration of a marketing body or a research body for the meat-processing sector. The pre-conditions are the same as for other such bodies: that the body must be a company limited by guarantee, it must be able to represent the meat-processing sector, and it must have consented to the declaration.
Items 16 and 17 end the payment of the proceeds of live-stock slaughter and beef slaughter levies to the industry marketing body and the industry research body, both of which roles are currently held by MLA. Item 18 moves these same funds to the meat processor marketing body and the meat processor research body. In additional to covering administrative costs, item 23 authorises the meat processor marketing body and research body to expend the levy funds they receive only for marketing and research purposes respectively or other allowable payments prescribed in regulations. The new paragraphs are similar to those that authorise such spending by similar bodies.
Item 26 authorises the various industry bodies operating under the AMLI Act to use information about levy payers, received under the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Act 1991, in order to maintain their membership and perform their functions.
Items 28–41 replace references to the ‘industry marketing body’ and ‘industry research body’ with references to the ‘meat processor marketing body’ and the ‘meat processor research body’ in the Primary Industries (Excise) Levies Act 1999. These amendments permit the levy funds to be directed to the new meat processor research body and meat processor marketing body. Four spent provisions are also repealed.
In sum, the industry proposes that under statutory arrangements the current program of R&D and marketing investments will be maintained and, if approved by AMPC members, widened to include animal welfare, expanded environment and resource management and some economic aspects to improve profitability and enhance issues management. It further envisages no change to the industry services model which is based on a consultative approach to development of investment plans by AMPC, MLA and the Australian Meat Industry Council and existing financial management arrangements.
The only real change expected as a result of this bill is that all red-meat processors will, in effect be ‘members’ of AMPC, providing the opportunity for greater consultation processes in that sector.
This section draws heavily on material circulated to participants in the meat industry ballot which also included arguments for and against the proposal: Australian Meat Industry Council and Australian Meat Processor Corporation, ‘Ballot of meat industry participants’, http://www.ampc.com.au/files/0399949384393346AECFINAL2_(2)_Oct06.pdf, accessed on 28 May 2007.
Ian Ireland and Peter Hicks, ‘Australian Meat and Live-stock Industry Bill 1997’, Bills Digest, no. 79, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 1997–98, http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/1997-98/98bd079.htm.
Explanatory Memorandum, p. 2.
This section also draws heavily on material referred to in Endnote 1.
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2007
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2007.