Bills Digest No. 198 1997-98
Veteran's Entitlements Amendment (Male Total Average Weekly Earnings Benchmark)
Bill 1998
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Date Introduced: 2 April 1998
House:House of Representatives
Portfolio: Veterans' Affairs
Commencement: 19 March 1998, but see Main Provisions
Purpose
On 26 March 1998, the Government announced the linking
of the war widows' pension (WWP) to the benchmark of 25% of MTAWE. This
resulted in a fortnightly rate rise of $6.80 to $378.60, with the first
payment at the increased rate made on 9 April 1998.
This Bill proposes amendments to the Veterans' Entitlements
Act 1986 to ensure the rate of WWP is maintained at no less than 25%
of MTAWE.
This will align the WWP with the 25% of MTAWE rate benchmark
arrangements that have been put in place for social security pensions
paid under the Social Security Act 1991 and for the service pension
and income support supplement paid under the Veterans' Entitlements
Act 1986. These arrangements were provided for by the Social Security
and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Male Total Average Weekly
Earnings Benchmark) Act 1997.(1)
It is not entirely clear why this 1997 25% MTAWE Act
did not also include arrangements for the WWP. Perhaps it was not fully
realised at the time that there would be problems with parity and equity
between pension rates if all like pension payments were not included.
Background
Pre-1996 Election commitment
Prior to the March 1996 election, the Liberal and National
Parties gave a joint public commitment to maintain the pension benchmark
of at least 25% of Average Weekly Earnings.(2) The Social Security
and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Male Total Average Weekly
Earnings Benchmark) Act 1997, was the initial legislation that provided
for this commitment.
Rate of pensions to be maintained at least 25% MTAWE - Coverage of 1997
Act
The social security pensions that are covered by the 25% of MTAWE Act
1997 are:
- Age pension;
- Wife pension (ie. paid to female partner of an age or disability support
pensioner);
- Disability support pension;
- Widow's pension;
- Parenting payment (sole parent);
- Carer payment; and
- Mature age allowance and mature age partner allowance granted before
1 July 1996.
The veterans' affairs payments that are covered by the 25% of MTAWE Act
1997 are:
- Service pension;
- Partner service pension; and
- Income support supplement.
War Widow's and Widower's Pension (WWP) eligibility
There are two main situations where a WWP may be payable:
- Where a veteran dies as a result of a war or defence caused disease
or injury, then a WWP made be payable to the surviving partner (married
or defacto).
OR
- Where a veteran was severely incapacitated as a result of a war or
defence caused disease, then the widow/er of the veteran (married or
defacto) may qualify for a WWP.
WWP is paid at the same rate as the single rate of age
and service pensions but is not means tested, ie. no income or assets
test, and WWP is not taxable.
Number of WWP recipients
As at 14 September 1997 there were a total of 97 995
WWP recipients made up of 124 males and 97 871 females.
Income Support Supplement (ISS)
ISS is also payable in addition to WWP, but as ISS has
an income and an assets test it is targeted at those WWP recipients who
have limited means.
ISS was introduced on 30 March 1995 to replace the 'ceiling'
(frozen) rate of age, carer, wife and disability support pensions paid
to war widow/ers by The Department of Social Security (DSS) in addition
to the WWP. The main impetus for the introduction of the ISS was so that
war widow/ers, who also qualify for ISS, can receive both of their pensions
from The Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA).
The maximum rate of ISS is currently frozen at $120.10
per fortnight.
Cost
The Government has stated that the 25% of MTAWE benchmarking
of WWP will cost an additional $168 million over four years.(3)
Parity and differentials between pension and allowance rates
As highlighted in the Explanatory Memorandum,(4) the
rate of WWP has been paid at the same rate as the single rate of age or
service pension for nearly 35 years and this parity has been maintained
by identical indexation adjustment arrangements. Without the application
of this proposed Bill, the rate of WWP may fall behind those other pensions
that receive the benefit of the 25% of MTAWE Act 1997.
Historically, it was the Whitlam Government that announced
in 1972 a commitment to maintain the rate of pension at 25% of average
weekly earnings (AWE).
Prior to this the rate of pensions were increased largely
on an ad-hoc basis, as Governments perceived a need to adjust payments.
Twice yearly adjustments of pensions against the CPI
commenced in 1976.
Payments do not always increase. On occasions in the
past, where the CPI has not increased or has even reduced, there may be
no increase in payment rates. This last occurred for pensions in September
1997. Payments are not reduced where the CPI change is a nil or negative
figure. Separate to the indexation to the CPI in September 1997, pension
rates were not increased as rates were at least 25% of MTAWE.
During the 1980s and early 1990s, the economic dynamics
featured comparatively higher levels of inflation, interest rates and
investment earnings rates. During much of this period, both national wage
cases and successive Accords produced largely uniform movements in wage
rates.
In later Accords less than full CPI adjustments were
complimented by other trade-offs like tax rate adjustments and tax transfers
(eg. family payments). Accordingly, movements in the CPI were commonly
higher than movements in average wage rates and in this environment, benchmarking
income support rates to the CPI meant these payments readily kept pace
with wage rate benchmarks. There have been two ad-hoc increases, in 1990
and in 1993, to ensure pension rates maintained parity with 25% of AWE.
More recently these dynamics have changed with lower
inflation and lower interest and investment rates. Currently, the annual
underlying inflation rate is about 1.5%(5) but average ordinary full-time
earnings wages are increasing at about 3.9%.(6)
Through the entire period of the 1980s and 1990s, there
has been parity between the married rate of pension and the married rate
of allowance. Married rate refers to the rate paid each to a member of
a couple (married or de-facto). Payment of the same rate for pensioner
and allowance couples achieves the benefits of equity of assistance between
payments for like situations.
In the March 1998 rate adjustments, the married rate
of allowance was not changed, there being no increase in the CPI during
the measurement period. The maximum married rate payable (each partner
aged 21 or more) before and after March remained at $290.10 per fortnight
(pf) each. The maximum married rate of pension was increased to $295.80
pf each and there being no increase in the CPI, this increase was solely
due to the impact of the 25% of MTAWE Act 1997.
If the current feature of low or negative movements in
the CPI continues to be accompanied by relatively higher movements in
average wage rates, the differentials between pension and allowance rates
could well continue.
Main Provisions
Mechanism
This Bill has one Schedule to amend the Veterans'
Entitlements Act 1986.
The intention of the Bill is to mirror the application
25% of MTAWE Act 1997 to the service pension provisions in the Veterans'
Entitlements Act 1986. Therefore, the provisions in this Bill largely
mirror those contained in the 25% of MTAWE Act 1997.
Clause 2 of the Bill specifies that the amending
Act is to commence from 19 March 1998. The Veterans' Entitlements Act
1986 currently provides for Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments
to pension rates to take effect from 20 March and 20 September of each
year. Any adjustment arising from the CPI then takes effect from the next
fortnightly Thursday payday following these two dates. For payments under
the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, the next payday after 20 March
1998 was Thursday 26 March 1998.
The 20 March and 20 September dates of effect also apply
to CPI adjustments to pension payments provided for under the Social
Security Act 1991, with social security pension paydays being
the alternate fortnightly Thursday to the veterans' paydays. For the social
security pension payments the next payday after 20 March 1998 was 2 April
1998.
The Social Security and Veterans' Affairs Legislation
Amendment (Male Total Average Weekly Earnings Benchmark) Act 1997,
provided for the benchmarking against 25% of Male Total Average Weekly
Earnings (MTAWE) of social security pensions and veterans' service pension
to commence from 20 September 1997. For the September 1997 pensions rate
adjustment, there was no increase in the rate of pensions and there were
two reasons for this.
There was no increase in the CPI in the measured period.
There are legislative formulas in both the Social Security Act 1991
and in the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 to prescribe the periods
over which any CPI movement is measured. The second reason was due to
the pre-September 1997 pension rates already being at least 25% of MTAWE.
There is no obvious reason as to why this Bill proposes
to commence from 19 March 1998 and not 20 March 1998.
Perhaps, given that the 19 March 1998 date is now a retrospective
implementation date, the Bill drafters wish to err on the side of caution
and doubly ensure the start date commences no later than 20 March 1998.
The announcement of this initiative was made on of 26
March 1998 and stated the first instalment at the increased rate would
be made on 9 April 1998.
As the next available veterans' pension payday after
the start date for the legislation (ie. 20 March 1998) was 26 March 1998,
the payment made on 9 April 1998 included arrears for the 26 March 1998
payday.
Schedule 1 - Amendment of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986
Items 1 and 3 prescribe the quarters in each year
during which the MTAWE figure is to be measured for each March and September
rate adjustment. The measurement period is not over the whole year but
a quarter of a year.
This is the same methodology contained in the 25% of
MTAWE Act 1997, a methodology that was a matter of some debate in the
Senate during that Act's passage through the Parliament. The issue of
concern was whether there is any advantage or disadvantage in measuring
the AWE figure over a quarter as opposed to over a whole year. Measuring
over a quarter is consistent with the long-standing methodology prescribed
in the legislation for measure movements in the CPI. The answer depends
on how any one quarter compares to the whole year. Where the quarter is
comparatively lower than the whole year, a lower MTAWE figure will result
and vice versa.
Item 5 provides for the increase in the rate where
the rate that has been measured against the CPI is still less that 25%
of MTAWE. Where the CPI measurement arrives at a rate that is still at
least 25% of AWE, there is no further adjustment. Therefore, it is possible
for the CPI adjustment to result in a rate that exceeds 25% of MTAWE.
Sub-part (8) of Part 5 of the Bill contains
legislative arrangements to cater for the retrospective aspect of the
start date for this initiative.
Payments have already been made to WWP recipients at
the increased rate from 26 March 1998 payday under Ex-gratia payment arrangements.
This part of the Bill ensures there is no double entitlement to payments
once the Bill receives Royal Assent.
Concluding Comments
Prior to the March 1996 election, the Opposition parties
gave a joint public commitment to maintain the pension benchmark of at
least 25% of Average Weekly Earnings. The Social Security and Veterans'
Affairs Legislation Amendment (Male Total Average Weekly Earnings Benchmark)
Act 1997, was the initial legislation that provided for this commitment.
On 26 March 1998, the Government announced the linking
of the WWP to the benchmark of 25% of MTAWE.
This Bill proposes amendments to the Veterans' Entitlements
Act 1986 to ensure the rate of WWP is maintained at no less than 25%
of MTAWE thereby retaining its parity with the single rate of age and
service pensions. Without the application of this proposed Bill, the rate
of WWP will fall behind those other pensions that receive the benefit
of the 25% of MTAWE Act of 1997.
Endnotes
- Social Security and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Male
Total Average Weekly Earnings Benchmark) Act 1997.
- Liberal and National Parties' Social Security Policy Statement 'A
Social Security Safety Net', 22 February 1996, 2 - Retirees, para 1.
- Prime Minister, Press Release, 26 March 1998, 'War Widows'
Pension up by $6.80 a fortnight'.
- Explanatory Memorandum, 3.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No 6401.0 - March 1998.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No 6301.0 - February 1998.
Peter Yeend
12 May 1998
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and
Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure
that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information
publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are
those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and
Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues
contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and
for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal
opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary
or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators
and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1998
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act
1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their
official duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1998.
|