 |
Research Note no. 20 2006–07
Members of Commonwealth ministries
Martin
Lumb and Scott
Bennett
Politics and Public Admisistration Section
4 June 2007
Introduction
Many Members
of Parliament (MPs) aspire to ministerial office. Kim
Beazley Jr once said:
‘being a minister, that really was something special from the moment
I got it’.(1) Garfield Barwick was said to have arrived at
the Attorney-General’s office with ‘more ideas than a dog has fleas’.(2)
A lack of preferment, on the other hand, can mean frustration for those
MPs who do not receive the opportunity to show their abilities on the
government front bench.
How many
MPs achieve ministerial positions? How many women have done so? From
which states have ministers come? Have there been different trends over
time? How many Senators have held office? In answering such questions,
this Research Note uses material gathered by the Parliamentary Library’s
Politics and Public Administration Section for the production of the
Parliamentary Handbook, as well as from research undertaken for
Members and Senators. We do not include various offices associated with
the Ministry, such as Parliamentary Secretaries and Vice-Presidents
of the Executive Council. The information was current as at 30 April
2007.
How many are chosen?
Since 1901,
421 men and women, or 28.2 per cent of the 1490 members of the two houses,
have been appointed to executive office.(3) Over the years
the opportunity for selection has been affected by various factors,
including the number of ministers in each government. The Barton Government,
for example, which was appointed on 1 January 1901, included just
eight ministers, whereas the fourth Howard Government, appointed on
26 October 2004, comprised 30 MPs with the status of minister.
The size
of the Commonwealth Parliament also has been relevant. Changes in the
size of the Parliament in 1949 and 1984 had an impact upon the chances
of achieving ministerial office. A suddenly-enlarged parliament reduces
the ministerial chances of many who are currently occupying seats in
the two houses.
A third
factor has been the longevity of some governments which has blocked
the chances of many Opposition aspirants, as well as the ambitions of
restless government backbenchers. Long-term governments offer fewer
ministerial opportunities, while a government’s electoral defeat will
obviously increase the overall number of MPs who are appointed to executive
office. The combined total of ministers who served in the Page-Menzies-Fadden-Curtin-Forde-Chifley-Menzies
ministries of 1939–49 was 65, whereas the Menzies governments
of 1949 to 1966 totalled just 50 ministers.
Women
It was not
until 1943 that the first female MPs were elected, and it took a further
23 years before the first female minister was appointed—Annabelle
Rankin (Lib), Minister for Housing in the two Holt
ministries (1966–7).(4) By the end of the Keating Government
in 1996, seven more women had served. Twelve of the total 21 women who
have served as ministers have been appointed by the Howard Government.
The oldest minister
Queensland
ALP Senator Joseph Collings
was 76 when he was appointed to the Curtin ministry
as Minister for the Interior. His term ended on 13 July 1945, when he
was 80 years and 2 months, the oldest-serving minister to date.(5)
The youngest ministers
By contrast,
four ministers have been appointed at the age of 30. The first, and
youngest, was Charles Frazer
(ALP, appointed April 1910). He was 30 years and three months of age
when appointed Minister without Portfolio in the second Fisher Government.
Of the others, Gary Punch
(ALP, 1988) was 30 years and five months when appointed, Harold
Holt (United Australia Party, 1939) was 30 years and
eight months, and Andrew Peacock
(Lib, 1969) was 30 years and nine months.
The longest serving
Five men
have served as ministers for 20 years or more, including four Prime
Ministers.
John
McEwen (25 years)
John
McEwen, the former leader of the Country Party (1958–71),
held several portfolios between 1937 and 1971. His term as Minister
for Trade and Customs is the second-longest continuous term of any portfolio
since Federation. He was sworn in to the portfolio on 11 January 1956
and ended his term on 5 February 1971—a period of 5504 days or just
over 15 years.
George
Pearce (24.7 years)
George
Pearce, the second-longest serving minister, holds
the record for service as Minister for Defence—5013 days, or 13.7 years.
This was served in four periods. Remarkably, his first term in the Defence
portfolio was served in the Labor Government of Andrew Fisher (1908–09),
while his final term was served in the UAP Government of Joe Lyons (1932–34).
Robert
Menzies (23.1 years)
Robert
Menzies’ first term as a minister began in 1934 and
his last ended in 1966. He was the longest-serving Prime
Minister (1939–41, 1949–66). His second term is also the longest continuous
period as a minister in any portfolio. His 5883 days was over a year
longer than John McEwen’s
term as Minister for Trade and Customs referred to above. Menzies
is one of the few MPs to have become a minister as soon as he entered
the Parliament, having served, immediately prior to his election, as
a minister in the Victorian government of Stanley Argyle.
William
McMahon (21.4 years)
Although
he served as a minister for over 21 years cumulatively, William
McMahon did not serve as long in any single Executive
role as any of the other four ministers discussed in this section. His
ministerial career began in 1951 and ended with his defeat
as Prime Minister in 1972. His longest-held office was as Minister for
Labour and National Service under Robert
Menzies from late 1958 until January 1966—a total of
2604 days or 7.1 years.
Billy
Hughes (20.2 years)
W.
M. (Billy) Hughes’s
ministerial service began at the same time as Pearce’s in 1908 and concluded
in 1941, when Hughes was 79 years of age. Hughes
holds the record as the longest-serving Attorney-General. In three terms,
he was in office for a total of 4935 days (13.5 years). As with Pearce,
he served in both Labor and non-Labor ministries.
Members or Senators?
Ministers
may come from either house of the Parliament, and there is no restriction
upon how many may come from either. Some critics have,
however, called for a ban on Senators serving on the grounds that the
Senate would be better able to focus on its review role were it to contain
no ministers.(6) One former Liberal MHR and Senator, David
Hamer, has claimed that:
The whole political
aspiration pyramid is skewed in the wrong direction. The Senate will
not become a really effective legislature until ministers are removed
from it.(7)
Despite
this, it is inevitable in a Westminster-derived Parliament that, not
only will most ministers come from the House of Representatives, but
a disproportionate number will do so. Section 24 of the Constitution
contains the so-called ‘nexus’, which requires that the number of Representatives
‘shall be, as nearly as practicable, twice the number of the senators’.
If ministerial appointments matched this, obviously about 33 per cent
would be Senators. In fact, of those who have been MPs only 110 (26.3
per cent) have come from the Senate, while 309 (73.7 per cent) were
members of the House of Representatives.
Neither Member nor Senator
Two of the
421 ministers never served in the Parliament. The former Queensland
Premier (1898–9), James Dickson,
was sworn in on 1 January 1901 as the Barton Government’s Minister for
Defence. Dickson became ill during the Inauguration ceremonies in Sydney
and died nine days after his swearing-in. His few days in office remain
the shortest period served by a defence minister.
Neil
Lewis, Tasmanian Premier at the time of the Commonwealth
Inauguration, was sworn in as Minister (without portfolio) on the same
day as Dickson. However, Lewis did not
seek a Commonwealth Parliament seat in the March 1901 elections, relinquishing
his position on 23 April.
Seven other
early appointees to the Barton ministry served as ministers
prior to the first Commonwealth elections on 29–30 March 1901. These
were: Edmund Barton (PM), Alfred Deakin (Attorney-General), William
Lyne (Minister for Home Affairs), George Turner (Treasurer), Charles
Kingston (Minister for Trade and Customs), John Forrest (Postmaster-General
and Dickson’s replacement as Minister for Defence), and James Drake
(Forrest’s replacement as Postmaster-General).(8)
Following
the disappearance of Prime Minister Harold
Holt on 17 December 1967, John
McEwen was sworn in on 19 December and served as caretaker
Prime Minister until 10 January 1968. Senator John
Gorton became Prime Minister on that day (the only
Senator thus far to hold the office). He later resigned from the Senate
on 1 February 1968 in order to contest a by-election for the House of
Representatives seat held by Holt. From 1 to 24
February 1968 (the latter being the date of Gorton’s
election to the House of Representatives) the Prime Minister
was not a member of the Parliament. This is the only time since 1901
that a minister has not been a member of either house.(9)
That Dickson,
Lewis and the others mentioned here could
be ministers, despite not holding a parliamentary seat, was due to s.64
of the Constitution. This states that:
… no Minister
of State shall hold office for a longer period than three months unless
he is or becomes a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
Only an
emergency such as the disappearance of the head of a ministry is likely
to see the repeat of the unique Gorton experience.
A blink of an eye
In contrast,
some ministerial appointments have been very short indeed. Four cases
involved the relevant Prime Ministers in unwanted controversy.
Prime Minister
Lyons (UAP) decided on a Cabinet reshuffle in November 1938, the most
significant part of which was putting the Minister for Defence, Geoffrey
Street, ahead of the Minister for Trade and Customs, Thomas
White, in the order of seniority. John
Perkins was appointed to the positions of Minister
without Portfolio administering External Territories, and Minister without
Portfolio assisting the Prime Minister. Lyons also
created what was described as a ‘senior Cabinet group’, which would
deal with ‘major matters of national significance and government policy’.
White responded by resigning his position and crossing
the floor in a vote against the Government, with Perkins
being appointed to White’s portfolio. Perkins thus held his two ministerial
positions for a single day.(10)
In June
1975 the Whitlam Government (ALP) Minister for Labor and Immigration,
Clyde Cameron, refused to accept a ministerial reshuffle that would
have seen him demoted. Whitlam had him removed from office by the Governor-General.
At the 10.00 am swearing-in ceremony on 6 June, the new Defence Minister,
Bill Morrison, also
accepted the position of Minister for Science and Consumer Affairs.
Then, at 12.30 pm on the same day, Cameron
and Whitlam drove to Government House for Cameron’s
swearing in as Science and Consumer Affairs Minister. Morrison’s
term in this portfolio of less than three hours has been the briefest
of any minister to date.(11)
On the evening of 22 February 1979, the Finance Minister
in the Fraser Government (Coalition), Eric
Robinson, suddenly announced his resignation. He stated
in a letter to the Prime Minister that he could no longer give Fraser
his ‘unqualified support’. Four days later, however, he returned to
office, with Fraser stating that ‘there
were no significant differences’ between the two men. In the intervening
four days, the Treasurer, John Howard,
was also Minister for Finance, the briefest term in this portfolio.(12)
On 3 June 1991, Prime Minister Hawke
was confronted by the resignation of his Deputy PM and Treasurer, Paul
Keating. Hawke served officially as Treasurer until
the swearing-in of John Kerin
on the following day.
‘Sacking’ ministers
The stripping
of Cameron’s ministerial position was the second such ‘sacking’ following
the refusal of a minister to accept a Prime Ministerial instruction
to resign his portfolio. In December 1918 a Royal Commission investigating
defence contracts referred critically to Jens
Jensen, Minister for Trade and Customs. Jensen
refused an instruction to resign, so Prime Minister Hughes
advised the Governor-General to withdraw his commission.(13)
States and territories
Table 1
shows the state and territory representation in the nation’s ministries
since Federation.
Table 1: State and territory
ministers (1901–2007)
|
State/territory
ministers |
%
ministers |
%
MPs |
|
NSW |
32.0 |
35.8 |
|
Vic |
25.1 |
26.6 |
|
Qld |
14.0 |
14.8 |
|
SA |
10.0 |
8.8 |
|
WA |
10.0 |
7.7 |
|
Tas |
7.6 |
4.6 |
|
ACT |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|
NT
|
0.5 |
0.8 |
The three
most populous states of New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland have
provided 77 per cent of the Parliament’s members, but slightly fewer
ministers (71.1 per cent). New South Wales has had the most obvious
disparity of the three.
Some state
figures have been consistent over time, while others show some variation
according to the period. NSW has had relatively fewer ministers since
1984 than before this date, whereas Tasmanian MPs were more likely to
achieve ministerial office between 1901 and 1949 than in the years since.
Since 1984 South Australia (11.1 per cent) and Western Australia (11.7
per cent) have had individual tallies almost the size of Queensland
(12.6 per cent), despite returning fewer MPs.

The ‘Big Four’
Some qualification
needs to be made, however. NSW and Victoria
have provided 57.1 per cent of all ministers. These two states have
also dominated the major Cabinet ministries of Prime Minister (80 per
cent from these two states), Treasurer (77 per cent), Minister for External/Foreign
Affairs (70 per cent),(14) and Minister for Defence (54 per
cent) (Table 2). Another significant Executive office dominated by the
largest states has been the Attorney-Generalship. Three-quarters of
the chief law officers have come from NSW and Victoria.
PMs’ backgrounds
One factor
in ministerial appointments might be the state background of the Prime
Minister. There have been too few Prime Ministers from the four smallest
states to justify any comment, but the position is different for the
two largest states.
The six
Victorian Prime Ministers (Deakin, Bruce,
Menzies, Gorton, Fraser,
Hawke) have appointed 180 Victorian-based ministers, and only 176 NSW-based
ministers. In the governments of the 11 NSW Prime Ministers (Barton,
Watson, Reid, Cook,
Hughes, Page, Chifley, McMahon, Whitlam,
Keating, Howard) ministers from NSW have
predominated, and far more disproportionately than in the Victorian
case (Table 3).
Table 3: Appointments by
NSW PMs
| NSW
PMs |
NSW
mins |
Vic
mins |
| Barton |
3 |
2 |
| Watson |
2 |
1 |
| Reid |
3 |
3 |
| Cook |
3 |
3 |
| Hughes |
17 |
11 |
| Page |
6 |
3 |
| Chifley |
13 |
12 |
| McMahon |
14 |
12 |
| Whitlam |
27 |
8 |
| Keating |
29 |
26 |
| Howard |
44 |
32 |
| Total |
161 |
113 |
Much of
the NSW distortion occurred in the Whitlam years with 27 NSW ministers
and only eight Victorian ministers. In the case of Victorian Prime Ministers,
Prime Minister Hawke showed the strongest positive
home state bias. By contrast, significantly more of the Menzies-appointed
ministers came from NSW than from Menzies’ home state
of Victoria (Table 4).
Table 4: Appointments by
Victorian PMs
| Vic
PMs |
NSW
mins |
Vic
mins |
| Deakin |
8 |
10 |
| Bruce |
7 |
7 |
| Menzies |
60 |
49 |
| Gorton |
29 |
28 |
| Fraser |
39 |
43 |
Conclusion
The Commonwealth Ministry
will remain the career pinnacle for most MPs. The story of who is appointed—and
who is not—will continue to be an important part of the Australian political
story.
- Peter FitzSimons,
Beazley, HarperCollins, Sydney,
1998, p. 197.
- David Marr,
Barwick, Allen & Unwin,
Sydney, rev. edn 2005, p. 141.
- W. M. Hughes
has been counted twice due to his serving as a minister while representing
seats in both NSW and Victoria.
- Rankin was not the first woman
to serve in Cabinet. This honour fell to Enid
Lyons, Vice-President of the Executive Council 1949–51.
- Collings in fact served in the first Chifley Government
as Vice-President of the Executive Council for another 15.5 months.
- Scott Bennett,
‘The Australian Senate’, Research Paper, no. 6, Parliamentary
Library, Canberra, 2003–04, p. 19.
- David Hamer
‘Parliament and Government: Striking the Balance’, in Julian
Disney and J. R.
Nethercote (ed.), The House on Capital Hill. Parliament,
Politics and Power in the National Capital, Federation Press,
Sydney, 1996, p. 74.
- Richard O’Connor
was also in the Barton Cabinet but as Vice-President of the Executive
Council, rather than as a minister.
- It has been claimed that Michael Lavarch was Attorney-General
while waiting for a special election in Dickson which followed the
death of a candidate in the 1993 Commonwealth election, see Imre Salusinszky,
‘Catch 22 for a seatless PM’, Weekend Australian, 26 May 2007.
In fact, Mr Lavarch was not
appointed until after the election.
- ‘Mr White’s
Dramatic Resignation’, Sydney Morning Herald, 9 November 1938.
- Jack Allsopp, ‘Cameron
fiasco!’, Sun, 6 June 1975.
- Michael Prain,
‘Robinson bounces back’, Sun-Pictorial,
26 February 1979.
- Geoffrey Sawer,
Australian Federal Politics and Law 1901–1929, Melbourne,
MUP, 1956, p. 161.
- The title was changed to ‘Foreign Affairs’ in 1970.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available
to members of Parliament.

© Commonwealth of Australia
This work is copyright. Except to the extent of uses permitted by the
Copyright Act 1968, no person may reproduce or transmit any part of this
work by any process without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary
Librarian. This requirement does not apply to members of the Parliament
of Australia acting in the course of their official duties.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament
using information available at the time of production. The views expressed
do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor
do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: web.library@aph.gov.au.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian.
Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications
with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients
may contact the author or the Library’s Central Entry Point for
referral.
|
 |